Regarding copyright, see Legal Notice on the linked page:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/12/public-international-notice-substance.html
=====
Wednesday, December 27, 2023
Public International Notice -- The Substance of the Law
By Anna Von Reitz
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents:
I received, as I often receive, a snippet of legal research and interpretation as follows--- and I quote:
"I am going over a case now that clearly states that the federal statutes, which are not the same as the federal law that arises under the common law, Do Not Apply to those people that are only citizens of their state. That is stating they do not apply to white people.
I have personal(ly) verified that the fed statutes say the same thing about the personal income tax mandate - with one exception - if they are working for the fed gov.
Powe v. United States, 109 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1940)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 109 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1940) January 17, 1940
This is an open admission that the state statutes do not either. Both sets of statutes are enforced in legislative branch courts - which have no constitutional authority over whites.
Whites are persecuted by them because they and their attorneys are programmed into incompetence and they don't know (enough) to object or how."
Fascinating, isn't it? And nearly impossible for Joe Average American coming in off the street to make sense of it.
I don't usually spend a lick of time thinking about forms of law that don't apply to me and don't recommend mucking about in Federal Codes -- that is, Federal Statutes, either, because that really is off the beaten path, but this is such a good example of the Letter of the Law versus the Substance of the Law, that I can't resist commenting.
Any such reference to race in the application of law in this country can only arise under the auspices of the Confederation of States-of-States or the Federal Republic administered by the Confederation between 1787 and 1861, both of which have lain dormant and awaiting Reconstruction for over 150 years.
The Federation of States (1776 to present) has never recognized race as any component of actual state citizenship, but rather relies on the issue of an individual's status as a free man or woman to determine their eligibility for jobs, offices --- and equal consideration under the Public Law.
Racial requirements and exemptions were established instead by the Confederation of States-of-States (1781 to 1861) and carried over to the Federal Republic (1787 to 1861) operated by the Confederation. After the Civil War, a Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated" adopted these racial requirements and exemptions when it unilaterally created and conferred "Fourteenth Amendment citizenship" obligations on freed Negroes --- who were actually Foreign Sovereigns with respect to this same British Crown Corporation.
It should be obvious that any court misapplying exemptions related to the functionally non-existent Confederation in the present day, or the dormant Federal Republic, either, is as far off course as it is possible to be in the realm of logic. Unless, of course, one applies the By-Law Amendments of a Scottish Commercial Corporation that has been defunct since 1907 to living Americans in the present day.
The only authority still standing is the Federation of States, not the Confederation of States; when the Confederation ceased functioning, its delegated powers reverted by Operation of Law to the delegator of those powers --- the Federation of States. The same is true for the Federal Republic.
The delegated powers extended to the Federal Republic by the Confederation of States-of-States also automatically reverted back first to the Confederation and from the Confederation to the Federation from which the delegated powers were apportioned to begin with.
The inoperable status of both the Confederation and the Federal Republic are firmly established in the public record, and so is the default of their contract(s) to perform. Period.
The only way that they or their Law can be operated today, is as Law adopted in conformance with the customs and Law of the Federation of States.
As the Federation never addressed race as any element of Law, it cannot be presumed that exemptions related to race should be applied based on Public Law promulgated by the defunct Confederation or the Federal Republic, either one.
We are operating solely under Federation auspices now, just as we did from 1776 to 1781.
Similar to prosecutions based on "the Fourteenth Amendment" adopted by The United States of America, Incorporated, a Scottish Commercial Corporation that published it's "Constitution" in 1868 and went permanently bankrupt in 1907, the idea that the courts in this country are still applying the exemptions for "whites" provided by the long-vacant Confederation and its Federal Republic, may be true, but if so, is outstandingly illogical and unsupported by any current authority.
Until such time as the States of the Union act to Reconstruct their States-of-States and reconvene the Confederation, and until the Confederation restores and Reconstructs its Federal Republic, both these entities-- the Confederation and the Federal Republic --- are functionally defunct and can exercise no more authority or provide any exemptions than the wind blowing over the Arlington Cemetery.
The requirement that "only citizens of their state" be white males (to be exact) refers to the "Confederate state" --- meaning the State-of-State business organizations that were members of the Confederation.
Not our States of the Union.
This vernacular shortening of "Confederate state" to "state" has led to no end of confusion -- including confusions-at-law, a confusion that continues to the present day.
Once we dispense with that red herring we are left with the rest of the content, and it boils down to this -- no Federal Code (or "Federal Statute" referenced as Statute-at-Large) ever published in the Federal Register is meant to apply to members of the American Public, whether or not you are white.
It would be convenient and desirable for the remnant of the Federal Government represented by the two remaining Federal Subcontractors resident in the District of Columbia to work with the Federation of States to publish a small book containing the Federal Statutes-at-Large and sections of Code that have been published in the Federal Record which may still pertain to members of the American Public under the Federation's Administration, but that would be too simple and employ too much common sense.
It would also make it less convenient to entrap Americans and fleece them under False Legal Presumptions. So, thus far, the Federation is saddled with this onerous research project among many others.
Finally, let's address this odd idea of "constitutional authority over whites" or lack thereof.
This goes back to the days immediately after the Civil War and the "Constitution" published by the Scottish Commercial Corporation operating as "The United States of America, Incorporated" and the creation by that entity of Fourteenth Amendment citizenship, which originally applied only to Negroes "and other stateless persons of color".
The problem arose because in some States there was resistance against allowing freed plantation slaves to become state nationals or state citizens, either one.
The British Crown Corporation operating "as" The United States of America, Incorporated, opened up its doors and latched onto these poor confused people and unilaterally "conferred" their brand of "citizenship" on them.
That is, they shanghaied them into British Territorial jurisdiction and subjected them to British Territorial law, and enslaved them as debtors to the Crown; in this way, the Perpetrators contrived to abolish (private) slavery with one hand (Thirteenth Amendment) and created public enslavement with the other (Fourteenth Amendment) for the purposes of administering their new "USA, Inc." corporation by wringing "war reparations" out of the victims of slavery by enslaving them again to foreign corporations acting as "Masters".
All these institutions and organizations are now dead and gone and are owed good riddance.
The Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated" never had any standing or authority to create law for anything but itself, and its publication of a "Constitution" for itself in no way changed that. This organization and its Fourteenth Amendment have been defunct since 1907, and as a practical matter, their unilateral "conferring" of undisclosed foreign citizenship obligations on anyone born in this country regardless of race was outrageous and unlawful and illegal from the start.
Anyone born on the land and soil of one of our States of the Union is born a free man or free woman and inherits sovereignty in their own right, vouchsafed to them directly from the Settlement of the Norman Conquest --- without regard to their race or creed.
As a result the British Crown's presumption of powers never bequeathed to them in these matters of substance is an even more egregious and ignorant abuse of Law that should have never occurred; they were arresting, impersonating, kidnapping, and imposing foreign citizenship obligations on Foreign Sovereigns from the very start of this long criminal rampage.
Both the Confederation and the American Federal Republic have been inoperable since 1861. The Federation of States to which their delegated powers revert has continued to operate and to adopt those Unrevised United States Statutes-at-Large which are compatible with its own Laws, that is, the Four Organic Laws governing this country and its foreign relations.
As we have seen, there is no basis to presume that the Federation ever considered race a component of state citizenship in the actual States of the Union, and therefore no basis to presume the existence of exemptions based on race within the jurisdiction of the Federation.
Rather, so-called "Federal citizenship" conferred on former black plantation slaves was initially applied only to Negroes and that is what created the so-called "white exemption" from the obligations attached to this then-new Fourteenth Amendment citizenship created by a British Crown Corporation deceptively operating "as" The United States of America, Incorporated.
My point is this-- in order for Law to have Substance it must have standing, and the only standing is available on the land and soil of this country, which is occupied by the Federation of States and the Several States individually, and respectively.
Substantive Law outranks and pre-dates all and any statute, code, regulation, ordinance, or legislative product whatsoever, always. Any such statute, code, regulation, etc., that does not comply with our Organic Law is void on our shores and with respect to our people, that also means our people of color.
As you can now hopefully see, any misapplication of legislative law to the American Public, whether as an obligation or as an exemption, is ludicrous.
And this is made doubly ludicrous in clear view of the fact that the Confederation and the Federal Republic have been inoperable and vacated since 1861, and the Scottish Interloper doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated" together with its Fourteenth Amendment, have been defunct since 1907.
We read with incredulity that former USA, Inc. President Donald Trump was being prosecuted as a Fourteenth Amendment citizen of the United States; why not be prosecuted as a unicorn or fairy, instead?
There are no "Fourteenth Amendment citizens" today, and there never were any legitimate Fourteenth Amendment citizens in the past, either.
There were merely sweet and innocent people seized upon by British pirates and enslaved by these brutal imbeciles to pay their debts for them, with no shred of legitimate authority for any of it.
No doubt there are hoary members of the Privy Council having a good laugh at Donald Trump's expense, but the laugh has returned to them in the form of their legless indebtedness -- due wages for their greed, ignorance, and disrespect for actual Law.
The only enforcement available for the Unrevised Statutes-at-Large is from the Federation adopting those in conformity with its own Laws and Customs-- that is, the Four Organic Laws of this country.
There is no basis for prosecuting --or exempting-- anyone under the "Fourteenth Amendment" unless we are to presume that the administrative "by-laws" adopted by a long-defunct Scottish Commercial Corporation have some arcane Night-of-the-Living-Dead authority and enforcement power hitherto unheard of in this part of the galaxy.
This Notice and discussion needs to be handed to every Hired Jurist sitting as Judge in this country, every attorney, every paralegal, every court clerk, so that they can examine the history and facts for themselves and determine in a logical and reasoned way which laws apply to the American Public, which laws are defunct, which laws are substantive, which laws are merely administrative, which laws are legislation applying to public employees, and which laws are owed enforcement, together with the authority for that enforcement, in each jurisdiction.
The courts are corrupt, of that there can be no doubt; but the courts are also unlearned and confused, which contributes mightily to the overall corruption and confusion -- a confusion that is inevitably suffered by the American Public, too, and which leads to many unjust and capricious court decisions lacking any authority beyond a judge's personal opinions and "discretion".
Our American Government is still here, still operational, still upholding the Organic Law of this country, and still owed every jot of every treaty and contract ever penned with its knowing and consensual agreement.
We expect our Federal Subcontractors to provide knowledgeable and compliant Judges operating their courts of strictly limited jurisdiction according to the Organic Law of this country, and also require that their Judges observe this commentary and act accordingly -- recognizing the differences of forms of law, the jurisdictions, and the authorities thereof, and properly applying them to the correct populations -- while forswearing application of any obviously unsupported or repugnant "law", like the so-called Fourteenth Amendment.
Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 27th 2023
----------------------------
See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
*************************************************************
