TROZZI's HEARING IN CANADA TODAY, YET ANOTHER VICTORY FOR TRUTH

by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

This morning, November 10, 2023, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario held a hearing as to whether revocation of Mark Trozzi's medical license was the correct penalty. The College had already made, on November 1st, a finding of dishonorable and unprofessional conduct -- as Trozzi had, contrary to the "recommendations" of the College, written exemptions for patients, from the Covid vaccine ("unless they has developed myocarditis from the first shot"), and had publicly questioned the science of the Pfizer vaccine.

I wrote at that time (at GumshoeNews.com): "Good! Great! This Ontario group has clarified their own incompetence and/or malfeasance by making that “finding.” As a result, folks in Canada can now face up to the issue of the LEGITIMACY of such bodies. As the Ontario body is clearly siding with the baddies who are injuring everybody’s health and being blatantly dishonest, it is only logical to say that it lacks legitimacy. Eh?"

But today's hearing, which the public could watch by Zoom (thank you, Zoom), did not contain opportunity for appeal. (That can occur later at the Divisional Court.) It was only to ask if revocation of the license is the right penalty. Note: it includes a $96,000 CAD billing, to the doctor, of the Tribunal's costs. Not chickenfeed!

Still, Dr Trozzi's attorney, Mr Michael Alexander, rose to the occasion by submitting that the matter of free expression, a Charter right in Canada, was relevant to penalty. He said that punishment of Trozzi for speaking out could have a chilling effect on other doctors. He also held forth, and was not shouted down (thank you, Canadians) on the principle of distrusting government. "That's why we have checks and balances; that's why we maintain sovereignty of the provinces" -- etc.

The panel of the College officials did not make any reply to that, other than to say that constitutional issues are not handled here, "per the ICMPA." And Ms Whitner, whom I took to be the tribunal's prosecutor, said that Mark Trozzi is not limited in what he can say, but what he can say as a physician. She referred to his holding the privilege of the right to practice medicine in Ontario.

If it's a privilege, who has the right to bestow that privilege? How does it gets to be called a "privilege." Basically, a government saw that there was a need for standards of the medical industry, and consulted with that industry who then provided the standards.

I have no idea how the College, as such, gets authority. (Please see my new book "Society Is the Authority.") Apparently they are the licensing body. But when you license someone to do such-and-such, you are not bestowing a privilege. So say I.

In any case, there is horrible scope for a coterie of "interested" doctors -- or in the ABA case, lawyers -- to control the way in which the member is allowed to practice. You should have heard Ms Whitner going on about the sins (she did not say 'sins') of Dr Trozzi, such as that he peddled (she did not say 'peddled') misinformation. Of course she did say 'misinformation,' as that is one of the counts on which he has been charged.

I feel sorry for Ms Whitner. Not because she is a liar. Rather because she is not a liar. I gather that she thinks anything that comes out of Pharma or WHO is trustworthy. I am sure she believes it is wrong for a doctor to discourage vaccination. Not because the College has ordered it but because it is just plain wrong to discourage vaccination.

Ms Whitner must have been intelligent enough to get into medical school, and intelligent enough to graduate therefrom. She must have, at one point, learned about Dr Semmelweis, and how he had been right even though he was drummed out of practicing obstetrics. The Semmelweis phenomenon is well known. Does Dr Whitmer think that Semmelweis is the only 'Semmelweis'?

Turning the Tables

But now, enough! Enough with whimpering about such sad things as the injustice to Trozzi, or the loss of cognition by "the panelists." Let's get down to business. Police business. When will the murderous vaccinations stop?

As far as I am aware, there have been no indictments for homicide or even for manslaughter. There may be some lawsuits in the works for wrongful death but that is not enough. At least one state has passed a law to prevent infants from being given a Covid shot.

The Missouri and Louisiana cases about freedom of speech are a nice step forward (Tom Paine interjects "Wha?"). I think a doctor or two got spared at the last minute from cancellation of license; maybe their "professional body" chickened out.

I am currently on the ballot in New Hampshire for the Republican Presidential primary. I am going to push for the arrest of Fauci, as demanded by Senator Rand Paul. And if Merrick Garland does not cooperate, then the arrest of Garland for obstruction of justice,

But even that does not punch hard enough. Thousands of people were deliberately murdered.

Oh, and I propose the extraditing of Albert Bourla, president of Pfizer. We all know that the US and the UK have an extradition treaty, unless you've never heard the name "Assange" -- who, in any case is an Australian citizen, thus bringing up the whole area of hosti humani generis.

Wow, I never thought I'd be talking hosti humani generis.

Just wow. Sky's the limit. Let's go, folks!

-- Mary can be reached at her website Constitution And Truth.com