Maui Fire: Seeking an Injunction against Governmental Coverup

by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

It looks to me that the fire in Lahaina was deliberately set, but of course I am in no position to know that for sure. Still, we citizens do not have to just gawk at efforts to conceal things.

Having watched the video by Geoff Cygnus, where he drives alongside the newly-built wall near Lahaina, I tried to think of how this coverup can be nipped in the bud by an injunction. I've drafted a make-believe lawsuit, below. By no means am I implying that Geoff Cygnus is involved in this project of mine. Think of it as a 'moot court' exercise. I do not intend to be the plaintiff.

Regarding whether the beach near Lahaina is one of the many beaches of Maui protected by laws graning public access, I can see on the map at Maui County's website that it does appear to be so.

Note: My understanding of Article I, sec 9 of the US Constitution is that if we have martial law, the courts (specifically, the writ of habeas corpus) go into retreat. Thus any action you wish to take needs to be handled as soon as possible, while we still have a court. I invite anyone to pursue this, using my suggested pleadings or any other method.

Suggested Pleadings

United States District Court
District of Hawaii

[This is a purely imaginary "filing," composed on September 4, 2023 in New Hampshire by Mary Maxwell]

______, Plaintiff, PRO SE

v

John Green, MD, Governor of Hawaii,

John Pelletier, Police Chief and Coroner of Maui,

The Head Officer of "Special Police" in Lahaina,

John Doe, putative government official who allowed Directed Energy Weapons to be used on Maui,
Defendants

Jury Trial Demanded

I. Introduction

1. Starting on August 8, 2023, there were fires on the island of Maui that have led to over 100 deaths so far, and the loss of homes to many.

2. A survey of the debris shows that the fires did peculiar things, such as cause the hubcaps of cars to disappear.

3. The fires seem to have not burned houses that have blue rooftops. The sparing of blue-color objects is a known feature of Directed Energy Weapons [hereinafter "DEW"].

4. People are distressed and shocked and have asked for information, but unavailingly.

5. A long wall is being hastily built along the roadside.

6. Nissan cars that look like police cars, manned, are sitting along the roadside.

II. Jurisdiction and Venue

7. The United States Court is the proper court because the case involves deprivation of civil rights under 18 USC 242, including a matter of color of law.

8. The Hawaii federal district court is the proper venue because the relevant fires occurred in Hawaii, and because the defendants may be engaged in a coverup in Hawaii.

III. The Parties

9. Plaintiff _______, [name to be provided], age________, lives at __________. His occupation is ____________. He is an amateur videographer.

10. Defendant Dr John Green, age 53, is the governor of Hawaii. He was elected in 2022.

11. Defendant John Pelletier has been Police Chief of Maui since 2021. Before that, he was a captain in the Las Vegas Police and was in charge of the response to a mass shooting there in 2017. He also has been serving as Maui's Coroner.

12. Defendant "Head of Special Police in Maui" is unidentified at this time, as it has not been admitted that Maui is using a special police force, along the roadside.

13. Defendant "John Doe" is a potential defendant if it is found that a Directed Energy Weapon was used in August 2023 in Maui

IV. Facts and Allegations

14. In late August, 2023, someone (presumably Gov Green) directed that a long wall, around 8 feet tall, be built on the roadway along the seaside in Lahaina, a town in Maui.

15. Plaintiff has been blocked from taking photographs near the scene.

16. When Plaintiff drives along the road, he is not allowed to pull over, or stop.

17. Plaintiff sees Nissan cars that look like police cars, manned, sitting along the roadside. He is told that they are Special Police. The cars appear to be brand new.

18. Plaintiff alleges that his constitutional right to liberty is being violated, as he cannot drive up roads that are blocked, and see what he wants to see. Thus his petitioning the government with grievances about the fire is also forestalled.

19. Plaintiff has been prevented, for no apparent reason, from taking photographs of the area. Such photos could provide evidence of a crime.

20. Plaintiff also alleges assault, by means of the wall that is being built, as it is causing him great worry. Secrecy naturally suggests something bad and unlawful is occurring.

21. Plaintiff notes that Defendant Pelletier may be in a conflict of interest by serving as a Coroner, who determines the cause of deaths during the fires, while also being a police chief possibly connected to the wall-building or the establishment of "Special Police."

22. Plaintiff notes that coverup is a felony, and that in March 2013, a Honolulu police officer, Robert Lewis, was charged with that crime (concerning a car accident, not the Maui fire).

V. Possible Additional Defendants

Depending on what is found at Discovery, it may be appropriate to add other defendants, such as media persons if they are delivering false information about the fire, members of the legislature or state executive, and/or members of the federal government.

VI. Prayer for Relief

Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, informational relief, and damages, as follows:

1. For the continuing construction of the wall to be enjoined, as it violates plaintiff's rights, per the laws that give citizens access to the ocean,

2. For the governor to explain what the wall is for, and to explain the Special Police, as it appears that the violation of plaintiff's constitutional rights is being carried out by persons acting under color of law (as "Special Police"),

3. For the Police Chief to explain why the Nissan cars, manned, are sitting at frequent intervals along the seaside road,

4. For putative defendant John Doe to give an accounting of the use of DEWs in August 2023 on Maui, or for government to explain-away the evidence that indicates DEWs were used.

5. For plaintiff to be paid $20,000 by the government of Hawaii for the assault he endured, and for his lost wages at his normal job while he is devoting full time to helping the citizenry.

Respectfully submitted, PRO SE,

[Signature of plaintiff] _____ , address, telephone number, email address _____,

Date______. Witnessed by _____________

Note: The fee is $402 to file a Pro Se federal lawsuit. An appeal will cost $505. There is provision for someone lacking the funds to file "In forma pauperis." The Clerk of Court helps you send out the summons to each defendant along with a copy of your pleadings. You don't supply your evidence till later. A Pro Se filer cannot be represented in court by a lawyer, but can get assistance from him/her in preparing the case. A Pro Se filing can only be done by an individual, not a group. Maybe you could also sue in a state court but I have made it federal thanks to the 18 USC 242 provision.

I declare the above draft to be public domain, and I add the disclaimer that I am NOT an expert. Geoff Cygnus, or any concerned citizen, is welcome to contact me via my website ConstitutionAndTruth.com, or my website JaharCompletelyInnocent.com -- Mary Maxwell

Here is Cygnus's video:

https://rumble.com/v3d0m68-mysterious-black-curtain-and-special-police-spotted-around-mauis-ground-zer.html

And here is video by Brush Junkie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZcUukugjrM

And here is a video about a local man who says Lahaina will not be broken:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq-k09xBhgw&t=11s

If you foresee suing, it is wise to capture these videos!