(Thanks, S. :)

Reader Charles Miller writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader: re Brunson Case

BRONSON LETTER AS REQUESTED, THE REAL DEAL.

Two options for charging the Justices at the Supreme Court for CONSPIRACY to commit CONVERSION and THEFT of the American People’s personal property, our Vote.

Mail to the court at the address in the letter.

OR, use the courts web portal. Instructions below.
Still open as far as I can tell.
When I sent via the web portal I got a receipt admitting received.

This at the first filing last year.

SUPREME COURT ACCESS.
Type in Supreme Court contact.
Click on Public Information Office.
That will take you to the; Contact Us- Public Information Office, page.
Fill out form info and attach executed Letter in box provided.
Affix signature to letter.
I get immediate online proof of receipt and later email verifying receipt.

BRUNSON CASE CHARGING AFFIDAVIT AGAINST DEFECTIVE PUBLIC SERVANTS
My input reformed to a CRIMINAL CHARGE against the Justices and every court employee.

Letter or web portal delivery.
Please share every where.

Name
Address
Email
Phone

Date:

Duly Served via Official Government Web Portal.

In the Peoples one Supreme Court, Original Article III Jurisdiction.

In RE: Docket No. 22-380 BRUNSON V ALMA S. ADAMS et al.

ADDENDUM TO OFFICIAL RECORD.

RULE 22 APPLICATION TO PROPERLY SEATED INDIVIDUAL JUSTICES.

DEMAND FOR PROOF OF HONOR AND COMPLIANCE WITH OATH REQUIRED BY LAW PRIOR TO ASSUMPTION OF THE PEOPLES OFFICE OF JUSTICE OF THE PEOPLES SUPREME COURT

RELIEF DEMAND.
THE PEOPLES PREROGATIVE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO TO THE COURT;

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DOES ANY PROPERLY SEATED JUSTICE CONSPIRE WITH THE SILENCE, COVERUP OF EXPOSURE OF THEFT OF THE PEOPLES VOTES RESULTING IN CONVERSION OF THE VOTE PROPERTY OF EVERY AMERICAN TO RULE BY CORRUPTED PUBLIC SERVANTS SETTING THE STAGE FOR DESTRUCTION OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT?

TO: Scott S. Harris.

Clerk of the United States Of America Supreme Court.

Supreme Court of the United States of America.

1 First Street, NE

Washington, District of Columbia.

20543

Attention; Individual Justices, in context of Rule 22, and 17.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Associate Justice Elena Kagan.
Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch
Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ( Ex Officio, Void Appointment and Confirmation by ILLEGITIMATE posers fraudulently claiming government offices. )

Proved by Docketing Case No. 22-380, admitting
FRAUD associated to the 2020 election procedures.)

CHARGING DOCUMENT: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DEFINING BREACH OF CONTRACT AND RESULTING CONVERSION, THEFT AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE AMERICAN VOTER.

The People’s Prerogative Quo Warranto delivered herein and herewith attaches individually every judicial officer and employee serving at the the Supreme Court of the United States of America because the Preamble People never limited in any manner whatsoever the People’s absolute right to hold our public servants to account without impairment or interference from our public servants.

THIS LETTER IS A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. DULY NOTARIZED.

1. I, ……………………, recognize the contract holder with the United States in its Supreme Court, identified as Petitioner, Brunson, in Docket No. 22-380 purchased a contract for application of and enforcement of the law and procedures protecting my private property, my vote, and every other Americans vote from criminal activities by identified Respondents, defendants in the lower courts. I demand the services paid for which were not received by Brunson, Petitioner, because the failure of this court to act in accord with the law in an honorable forth right manner affects me and every other American.

2. It is clear to me as it is to a majority of the American voters, that every judicial officer, particularly those serving in the Supreme Court, have BREACHED THEIR CONTRACTS to provide honest services to the American People, particularly regarding the judicial forum being accessed to investigate wrong doing and identify the criminals.

3. Public records available in very many forums, specifically government records, show in a conclusive manner, that the American People’s vote process has been tampered with in a criminal conspiracy to commit THEFT and CONVERSION of the Peoples political power controlling public servants.

4. Public records are never deniable.

5. I, … your name … , own my personal political will identified as my vote. I am not aware of any other individual or entity claiming to have an ownership position in my vote property and I do not believe any evidence exists that could impair or limit my ownership and exclusive control over my vote property.

6. I, … your name … , have never been informed or advised that any operation of governments, inclusive, held power or authority to tamper with, misdirect, refuse to recognize the trust implicated when receiving custody over my vote property, fail to provide proper security and safety over my vote property, or, during the acceptance process in Congress Assembled, refuse or failure to investigate credible allegations of fraud at the state level, and I am utterly convinced there is no evidence anywhere that could indicate public servants, in any manner whatsoever ever are authorized to commit fraudulent practices, particularly in relation to the Peoples political powers being applied.

7. My name is … your name … , and I am an American Citizen, and I currently reside in ……………, County, State of ………………… . My address is ……… your address, phone, email …… . I am of legal age and I hereby make the following testimony of my own free will and choice and that the facts I testify to are truthful to the best of my ability.

I OWN MY OWN VOTE AND IT HAS BEEN STOLEN BY CORRUPTED PUBLIC SERVANTS.

This is a criminal charge and I am reporting it to a Judge as required by 18 United States Code § 4, Misprision of Felony. “ Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. “

I demand the intangible right to HONEST SERVICES from every public servant, particularly Justices at the People’s one supreme Court because failure to act is a criminal act found at 18 United States Code § 1346. “ For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services. “

I demand all Justices, public servants paid to perform honestly enforcing the law take notice of the crimes exposed here.
18 United States Code §. 1341. “ Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful …… ……for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

8.This Criminal Charge affidavit is my Demand declaration for redress of grievances is protected and guaranteed by the Constitution for the United States of America of 1787 with the ratification of The Bill Of Rights as “further declaratory and restrictive clauses” by Congress on March 1, 1789 and then amended in 1791. And Amendment 1 states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

9. This affidavit hereby perfects legal constructive notice, presented by Petitioner Brunson, to the following Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States:, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch and Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh (“Justices”). And constructive notice also extends to the Clerk of the Supreme Court Scott S. Harris (“Harris”). The Justices and Harris shall be collective referred to as “You”.

10. “ Constructive notice in law creates an irrebuttable presumption of actual notice.” Mooney v. Harlin, 622 SW 2d 83.

11. I demand from you within 30 days of receipt of this affidavit. You are directed in your public servants capacity to recognize your employers order, to provide a written rebuttal to each and every point of the grievances stated herein via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, valid law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matters with particularity and specificity to those points to which you do not agree with.

12. You are required to respond by authority of, but not limited to, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X of the said Constitution, particularly your individual FIDELITY BONDS called oath of office required under Article VI of the Constitution you all promised to serve.

13. Your failure to timely respond under your know duties is admission and confession of Breach of Contract and employment standards, which will be memorialized forever as official government records you participate in creating. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297.

14. The Petition for Writ of Certiorari of his case# 22-380 properly presented You All with constructive knowledge of, but not limited to a series of compounding and accumulating CRIMES AGAINST EVERY AMERICAN VOTER.

a. The respondents named in the Writ, Docker No. 22-380, have taken an Oath to protect and defend the said Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

b. A rigged election is an act of war against, but not limited to, the said Constitution. This Honorable Court has already ruled that one need not pick up arms in order to “levy war” in US v Burr (1807) 4 Cranch (8 US) 469, 2 L.Ed. 684.

c. The identified respondents gave aid and comfort to the open public act of war by not investigating the allegations presented by over 100 members of Congress that the 2020 presidential election had been rigged.

d. The actions of the identified respondents was an act of treason. Article III, Section 3 of the said Constitution specifies that “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. “ Aid and comfort is defined as support of any nature or kind for any reason whatsoever that results in the American structure of government being attacked in any manner.

e. The penalty for treason can be death. 18 U.S. § 2381.
“ Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

f. The actions of the identified respondents created a serious national security breach that also affected he security of Canada and Mexico.

g. Fraud vitiates everything that it touches. “Our courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “"It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters." Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney, 252 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Ky.1952).” Radioshack Corp. v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256.

15. On January 9th, 2023 You posted a denial of the said Writ. Under the circumstances of this said Writ, this denial makes You at a minimum co-conspirators of, but no limited to, the following:

a. Denial of justice exposed by truth, public record facts and application of law owed to the American People as promised to be provided by judicial system constructed under the People’s Constitution and the American people.

b. In the highest order, You evaded, avoided and failed your sworn duty to uphold your Oath above all other instruments of law by giving aid and comfort to enemies of the said Constitution (as described above) which is an act of treason. Treason is not a Constitutional-authorized activity, thus, is prohibited by the Constitution with penalties as stated above.

c. You are not immune from arrest for your acts of treason. See Article I § 6 of the said Constitution defining limits of exemptions from prosecution of Legislators.

d. For all the reasons stated herein and found within this case (22-380) You have committed treason when you denied this case.

e. You also violated and deprived the American people of their right to vote. Rather, You stole my personal possession, my vote. “. . . the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law . . .” Yick Wo v. Hopkins 118 US 356 (bold emphasis added) Thus, You are guilty of theft of the highest order.

f. You, as another act of treason, fraudulently demonstrated to the American people and to the World, that in our current American systems operations, that the Oath is not binding in violation of the said Constitution under Article VI clause 3 which states that the Oath “. . . shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation. . .”

g. You are also guilty of violating your Oath when you denied docket No. 18-1147.

h. The Courts own declaration of law bind each of You to honor your oath and the court in which you serve by honorable publicly provable acts. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, defines personal obligations of each of You to recognize and operate under the facts and law constructively and judicially notices]d to each of You.
“ When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are supposed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth "may be a government of laws and not of men." For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” .

16. Also, the following naturally includes the said Constitution. “. . . In considering State constitutions we must not commit the mistake of supposing that, because individual rights are guarded and protected by them, they must also be considered as owing their origin to them. These instruments measure the powers of the rulers, but they do not measure the rights of the governed. . . . [A state constitution] is not the beginning of a community, nor the origin of private rights; it is not the fountain of law, nor the incipient state of government; it is not the cause, but consequence, of personal and political freedom; it grants no rights to the people, but is the creature of their power, the instrument of their convenience. Designed for their protection in the enjoyment of the rights and powers which they possessed before the constitution was made, it is but the framework of the political government, and necessarily based upon the pre-existing condition of laws, rights, habits, and modes of thought. There is nothing primitive in it: it is all derived from a known source. It presupposes an organized society, law, order, property, personal freedom, a love of political liberty, and enough of cultivated intelligence to know how to guard it against the encroachments of tyranny.” American Bush v. City Of South Salt Lake, 2006 Ut 40 140 P.3d.1235 (Bold emphasis added)

17. This execution of the Preamble People’s absolute right to hold our public servants to account via Quo Warranto, a prerogative Writ owned by the Sovereign People is outside and above the administrative jurisdictions constructed under the People’s Constitutions, both States United and National serving the States. There is no evidence of public record and I do not believe any could exist that could indicate that the good People are subjects to be Rule Over by public servants, particularly in matters concerning political subject matter issues such as the security and protection of the People’s votes.

18. Each and every letter, presentment, delivery, of any and all writings to the Supreme Court of the United States of America identified in any manner whatsoever to the context and subject matter Docket No. 22-380 is fully incorporated herein and herewith as official public record because no public servant holds authority or powers to limit the People, the employer in any manner whatsoever concerning how we communicate to our public servants.

Govern Your selves Accordingly. You and each of You are invited to memorialize self executed judgement in the open public forum of the whole world.

You all are the deciding factor at this moment making the determination of whether the United States of America is a Republic operated by the Rule of Law, or a slave operation with two classes of operators, the owners and the overseers such as many, many corrupted public servants, including each of You.

This Courts own Declaration of Law and Order perfectly defines this courts practice of slavery through the legal process. Coercion via superior position and controlled hidden procedures.
United States v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931 (1988).
“ Held: For purposes of criminal prosecution under § 241 or § 1584, the term "involuntary servitude" necessarily means a condition of servitude in which the victim is forced to work for ( serve without recourse )the defendant by the use or threat of physical restraint or physical injury or by the use or threat of coercion through law or the legal process. This definition encompasses cases in which the defendant holds the victim in servitude by placing him or her in fear of such physical restraint or injury or legal coercion. Pp. 487 U. S. 939-953. “ Emphasis and ( ) added.

Done this …… day of February, 2023, duly sworn first hand knowledge testimony pursuant to the pains and penalties of perjury found at 28 USC 1746(1), within in the United States of America venues.

DATE:
________________________________________

NOTARY.

***************************************************************************