The Portuguese were the first Europeans to reach the Cape of Good Hope, arriving in 1488. White settlement began in 1652, when the Dutch East India Company established a provisioning station on the Cape........ So, for over 700 years, whites and Portuguese have been in South Africa.

by Rixon Stewart | Aug 12, 2023

The fact that both the New York Times and the Anti Defamation League have come out to defend the “Kill the Boer” chant heard at political rallies led by Julius Malema speaks volumes about the NYT and the ADL’s real agenda.

The chant “Kill the Boer” means literally kill the white farmer and it comes at a time when there have been a spate of violent attacks on white South Africans, many of them farmers. Over 70,000 whites have been killed in the past few years.

Despite this background the New York Times is keen to emphasize that the “”Kill the Boer” song is not a call for violence against white South Africans. Quoting various figures from the anti-apartheid struggle, the NYT strives to convince readers that the words should not be taken literally.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/02/world/africa/south-africa-kill-boer-song.html

The Anti-defamation League is also keen to defend Julius Malema and his “Kill the Boer” song. According to Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL CEO, the song is not a call for genocide and he alleges that such claims originated with “right wing extremists, and particularly white supremacists “.

https://www.adl.org/resources/press-release/adl-statement-kill-boer

One wonders if the ADL would have been quite so defensive had the song repeated the lines “Kill the Jew”.

We suspect not but the ADL and the NYT would have us believe that the “Kill the Boer” is perfectly innocent.

So the question is: why are the ADL and the NYT at pains to defend Malema and his song?

The answer may be found in a reclusive South African billionaire property speculator, Jonathan Beale, who is in the process of establishing a network of luxurious kibbutz’s across South Africa.

While having urged his followers to seize White owned farmland, Julius Malema has breathed not a word of criticism of Jonathan Beale’s project.

That in itself is suspicious but add to that reports that Malema is being funded by Zionist Nathan Kirsh to the tune of R9 billion and an altogether different picture emerges.

One that prompts us to ask: is a political firebrand like Malema being used to intimidate white farmers so that property speculators like Jonathan Beale can obtain their land at knock down prices?

Naturally, there is no direct publicised link between Beale and Malema. That would be too obvious. Instead, we have a third party like Zionist Nathan Kirsh funding Malema so that he can continue his campaign to threaten and intimidate white farmers.

Of course ordinary blacks won’t benefit from this as witness what happened in Rhodesia. I was there in the seventies and even at the height of the war the farmland there was the most fertile and productive in Africa. Earning Rhodesia the title Africa’s breadbasket”.

Since then Mugabe’s thugs have taken over the white-owned farms and a once agriculturally abundant land now subsists on food charity handouts.

Julius Malema will take South Africa down exactly the same path and the only beneficiaries will be the likes of Jonathan Beale, who will obtain vast tracts of farmland at knockdown prices.

Meanwhile news outlets like the New York Slimes and organisations like the Anti Defamation League will provide cover for this scam. No doubt by blaming those evil “white supremacists” for Africa’s woes when investigators look too closely at what has happened.