Trump Indictments are Theater

by Miles Mathis

First published August 3, 2023

---

How do I know? The easiest way is this:

Obama-Nominated Judge In Trump Case Is 'Toughest Punisher' Of J6 Rioters

That's a headline today from Zerohedge. DC federal judge Tanya Chutkan is the judge in this one, and
this is what we are told about her:

"Chutkan has handed out tougher sentences than the [Justice Department] was seeking in seven cases,
matched its requests in four others and sent all 11 riot defendants who have come before her behind bars," AP
wrote of her last year.
"In the four cases in which prosecutors did not seek jail time, Chutkan gave terms ranging from 14 days to 45
days."

Except for one little problem. That is all a lie. There are no J6 rioters and no one is in jail or ever was. They are all military/intel actors, many of them from Air Force. I have already covered this in my long J6 paper, so we know this is all being staged. All those long terms in solitary confinement you keep hearing about are more Langley baloney. This is being scripted by the usual vaccine-damaged bozos in subbasement 9 at Langley, who haven't got a law degree among them. But they figure you don't either, so what the hey. Neatness has never counted at Langley, because they know they won't be fact-checked. They own the mainstream media and know their audience can barely read, much less pull apart a story based on logic or known facts or, least of all, the law. But I have reminded those who can that these hearings, trials, and sentences never make any sense.

We are told Chutkan has already presided over 30 J6 trials in less than two years. Pretty amazing speed she has, especially since she is simultaneously juggling these fake Trump trials.

So we know already without further research that this Judge Chutkan is yet another Hollywood judge sitting above a dummy court. This is all being run just for the papers. Let's see what anomalies we can find in this one article at ZH. Well, let's see, we get one in the opening paragraph, where they admit Chutkan came out the law firm that included Hunter Biden. She was the attorney for Theranos. So huge red flags already. We are told she was confirmed by the Senate with a perfect vote, with no Republicans voting against her. So why was her cloture vote 54-40? Apparently 40 senators were unhappy enough with her testimony to vote against cloture, but not one of them voted against her?
Makes no sense.

You know what also makes no sense? The charges. In the latest round of fakery, Trump is being charged with knowingly making false statements about an election, referring to his claims the election was stolen. So let me get this straight: questioning an election is now illegal? A candidate now has to concede defeat gracefully or he will be charged with felonies? Then what was the whole point of a concession speech, or concession? If it is a legal requirement that candidates bow to the initial results, then Congress needs to pass a law saying so, and we need to get rid of concession speeches, recounts, and lawsuits. But as of now, neither Congress nor anyone else has passed such a law. A candidate is allowed to question his own ballots, to call for recounts, to sue, and to refuse to concede. He would have to be, since it falls under the heading of FREE SPEECH! If you believe you have been cheated, you are allowed to say so. No one has to believe you, just as you don't have to believe the results. It is part of living in a FREE COUNTRY! Belief and thought cannot be coerced, not by the media, the government, or anyone else. This is a “thought police” case if ever there was one, and any real judge would throw it out of court with prejudice, as an assault upon the Constitution. She would bring the prosecutors up for malfeasance. Except that these aren't real prosecutors. Like the judge they are just actors in this mad play.

<------------->

To read 3 more pages of a pdf file, go to http://mileswmathis.com/chut.pdf

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~