Judy Wood's 9-11 Thesis and How We Can Deal with Our Treason

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Judy Wood's 20006 book "Where Did the Towers Go?" is a masterpiece. I am only up to page 78 so far. Dr Wood (PhD in mechanical engineering) easily disproves the claim that the collapse of WTC twin towers was caused by fire, as is ludicrously touted by the NIST (that's the National Institutes of Standards and Technology, within the US Commerce Department).

But she has also destroyed the theory of controlled demolition, the pancaking of the 110 floors of the tower. She presents instead an explanation based on directed energy, a la Nicola Tesla's work which has been hidden from the public

I find it annoying that Dr Wood gets hostile when people refer to her work as theory or opinion. She says she only collects empirical evidence. I am in no position, and will never be, to analyze the science of directed energy. I am also unable to run her story against, say, Prof Niels Harrit's thermite story or the mini-nuke theory of how the towers collapsed.

But her book has many wonderful surprises. In this article I will report what she says on three topics: jumpers, seismic signal, and the bathtub. Her answer to the question "Where did the towers go?" is that they got dustified, i.e., they broke into tiny particles and drifted away -- thanks to a directed energy weapon.

Are you ready? Purge whatever you have heard so far, including from the most dedicated dissidents. Particularly, purge rumors of Judy Wood being not up to snuff. Or dishonest. Or trying to sell a book (for the princely sum of fifty bucks). Just purge it.

Jumpers

No question the chapter on Jumpers is the human-interest highpoint of Judy's writing. (All of her book is clear, and she sounds like a teacher who wants to impart knowledge, not engage in polemics.) We all knew there were a few jumpers but she quotes several First Responders who said "It was raining people." Wood estimates up to hundreds of jumpers. The sound of them falling made a loud noise if they hit the outdoor covering above the lobby.

One jumper killed a fireman by sheer weight. A first responder said he saw one jumper vaporize in the air. Many said the bodies splashed on the ground and one could see loose body parts. I will have to check on that. Surely there have been experiments of dropping a pig or a sheep from such-and-such height to see if they "explode"? I thought we have fascia under our skin that would hold us intact.

I'm not ready to buy the author's remarks that a possible reason for the bodies being wet is that the sprinkler system may have been turned on in the offices when the fire broke out. If there were a fire on 80th floor this would not automatically cause all floors to sprinkle, would it?

I expect that later in the book she will argue that the victims at WTC did not suffer heat. She already posits, in the Jumpers chapter, that they may not have truly jumped, in the sense of making a decision to suicide. Rather, they were running away from something like an ADS. Active Denial System which, you may recall, was used on Aussies in Canberra during a protest in 2022. GOD HELP US.

Seismic Signal

What would I know about how a collapsing tower would cause this or that degree of earthquake per the Richter scale? I know nothing. But luckily there are two well-documented events to use for comparison. The government reported that in Palisade NY, 34 kilometers from lower Manhattan, a seismic reading was made both at the times of the planes hitting each building and the times of the fall of each tower.

This can be compared against statistics from a small earthquake in midtown Manhattan on January 2001, and against a 2006 case of a controlled demolition in Seattle WA, known as the Kingdome building. Per Judy Wood's mathematics, if the twin towers came down by pancaking, the seismic reading should have been 3.8 on the Richter scale, but it was only 2.3 (and she hints that even the report of 2.3 may have been, how you say, doctored).

From Page 77 of Judy Wood's book, regarding Kingdome:

"Carefully placed explosives -- 4,461 pounds in all -- collapsed the 25,000-ton roof like a cake taken out of the oven too soon. More than 21 miles of detonating cord exploded in a flash. Rapid puffs of smoke followed, and the massive roof ribs that formed the Dome’s 20 arches buckled first in three pie-shaped wedges. Then came the remaining three roof wedges, followed instantly by explosions in the support columns and in the roof’s tension ring, which had held the roof together by exerting 8 million pounds of force around its base."

The Kingdome property has a footprint much wider than that of the towers, but was only 36 stories high. The towers weighed about a million tons of material, all crashing down into two small footprints, compared to Kingdome's mere 130,000 tons being distributed widely. So the KIngdome earthquake should have been much smaller than the WTC's. Guess how much Kingdome registered on Richter?

Answer to my question: both WTC and Kingdome registered similar seismic signal: 2.3. Isn't that amazing? Oh, and the WTC earthquake should have lasted longer: 18 seconds, but it lasted only 8 seconds.

Note: bedrock conditions are important, too in affecting earthquake-equivalent Richter readings.

"If a structure is anchored directly into bedrock [yes, for the WTC], its demolition will yield a higher Richter than if it were not anchored this way. Why? Because if a structure is not anchored into bedrock, the energy released by its demolition is dissipated via the earth’s “cushioning” materials." [Kingdome was not in bedrock base.]

Another thing. Recall I said we have the benefit of a January 2001 earthquake in NYC for comparison. Page 70:

"The seismic signal from the January 17, 2001 earthquake shows a striking difference from the seismic signals recorded during the final destruction of each of the WTC towers. The signal from the January earthquake shows a lower amplitude signal arriving approximately 3.4 seconds before the main signal. This is the P wave (Primary wave), which arrives before the S wave (Secondary wave). The NIST report notes that the seismic records from the five major WTC events show no clear P or S wave arrivals."

Oh, and one more thing. One of the 9-11 first responders, Emergency Medical Technician Michael Ober, said:

"I don't remember the sound of the building hitting the ground. Somebody told me it was measured on the Richter scale. I don't know how true that is. If the building is hitting the ground that hard, how do I not remember the sound of it?"

The Bathtub

I have skipped the first part of the book in which Dr Wood makes a dog's breakfast of the pancake idea. Just consider this single point: In a pancake collapse, pressure must be put by each floor onto the floor beneath it, causing it to fall on the next one down, etc. But if the trouble started on the 80th floor, thanks to those awful plane hijackers, what of the 30 floors above the fire? Let's call it "the Muslim fire." The government's theory says that the pancaking began at the top (110th floor). So who provided collapsing pressure for each of those 30 floors above the Muslim fire?

As far as I know, Wood is the only person who has said the pancake theory would falter on that point alone. I don't know if the Architects and Engineers truth panel thought of it. Did you think of it?

Anyway, Judy has another item to add to the dog's breakfast. The towers were located at the foot of Manhattan, an area in which several of the lines of New York's subway system meet. Even before the Towers were constructed in the early 1970s, a protection had to be built to prevent Hudson River water flooding the subway tunnels. This structure (a bit like a moat) is known as "the bathtub."

On page 45, Judy Wood, mechanical engineer, says:

"The World Trade Center (WTC) towers did not “collapse” on 9/11/01. They didn’t have sufficient time to collapse because they were destroyed faster than is physically possible for a gravity-driven collapse. The evidence indicates that they were reduced to particles of dust in mid-air. This in itself rules out Conventional Controlled Demolition where a building is knocked off its supports and thereafter slams to the ground.

"My own journey through the actual physical evidence began when I considered the so-called WTC 'bathtub,' the name given to the retaining wall that protected the foundations of the WTC from water, even though these retaining walls extended as far as 70 feet below the water table.

"If the towers had indeed collapsed, or if conventional bombs had blown up the building, there would have been an enormous amount of material slamming down onto the WTC bathtub and foundation."

But here it is, guys, undamaged: (photo The Bathtub, Photo: 911 research.wtc7.net)

Treason

Hmm. I've just made up a new couplet:

"Treason doth never prosper, what's the reason?
For if 51% of the people do it, it's by definition no longer treason."

Personally, I do not know who attacked the WTC on September 11, 2001. Neither does Judy Wood. In fact she insists she has no business blaming anyone. Her business is to figure out what happened that day, not why. (Compare Elias Davidsson's excellent book "America's Betrayal Confirmed" which is only about the Why.)

Let's concentrate on the bathtub issue. It seems to me that the men who arranged for the destruction of the towers had to be careful not to harm the bathtub. Wow. That is a vote in favor of the directed-energy theory. Maybe it also accords with the mini-nuke theory of which I am ignorant. But we can see that a controlled demolition would have ruined the bathtub.

So we've got to picture men (gender no bar here, OK?) sitting at a table discussing how to get those towers down and yet not slam a lot of weight onto the bathtub. When did they meet? I guess they met before 1970. When skyscrapers are put up, the builders must show how they could be demolished, if necessary, without harming nearby buildings or any other basic infrastructure -- in this case, the bathtub.

I am arguing that before the towers went up, in the early 70s, some dastardly bastards (for want of a better designation) already knew about Nicola Tesla's technology. They talked about protecting the bathtub, at some far future time, when "we' (whoever the hell "we" is ) decide to perform the drama of the century. Ka-boom, two towers will disappear, and the nation will be duly terrified.

(Incidentally, I lived in Manhattan from 1970 to 1974. We all hated the towers. They were ugly and also they prompted many older buildings to lose tenants. I mentioned that, in 2006, on my website when I was running for Congress, but a friend kindly told me to delete that remark as I would look like "a crazy lady" for disrespecting the towers. Apparently, the scenes at which Americans get hit by 'terrorists' are supposed to become sentimental symbols of ...of... oops, I don't know what. Boston has erected some sculptures on Boylston Street to honor the Marathon dead.)

Finally, lets' get back to the dastardly bastards, the DBs. I am the author of a 2011 book entitled "Prosecution for Treason." So you may think I wish to hunt down some suspects. And I am the plaintiff in Maxwell v FBI et al, blaming the government for the Marathon affair. I did name suspects for that case. And Kevin Ryan has produced such a list for 9-11 baddies, entitled "Another Nineteen." And Christopher Bollyn makes a good case against Israel for 9-11.

But I am now of the mind that we're ALL in this. We all did 9-11. I don't mean you and I would sit there in 1970 calmly planning how the bathtub should be spared whilst 3,000 people above are meeting their death. ("It rained people.") Granted, there's a subset of us who were at that table. But if we are the background set, we supply the subset of DBs with the required support.

We all said "Rah, rah, get Bin Laden for attacking the WTC" didn't we? We all gave in to surveillance legislation, and the upcoming "social credit score system." We all ducked hearing about the fact that another 3,000 New Yorkers died from breathing the air around the towers. We knew KSM was getting tortured at Gitmo for having masterminded (?) 9-11. We put "the world's best mayor" (Giuliani) on the cover of Time magazine. Didn't we?

I'm not trying to get the DBs off the hook. I am merely wishing to switch the focus to the whole society. Yes, there were key liars in the 9-11 affair, but we have all allowed lying to become normalized as a part of American culture. Kids are taught that lying is a means to an end, and so it's OK. We lack social leaders. The wealthy and the blackmailed make major decisions for us.

This is how society is built. I think we should be attacking the heart of it. It doesn't have to be structured this way.

My suggestion is that we aim at the fear component. Probably 90% of Americans know, deep down, that 9-11 was an inside job, but are afraid to face it. I say, come on, hurry up, face it.

Take a deep breath and decide to let your neighbors call you a mental case. That's a harsh fate to endure, but it's nowhere near as harsh as what you might soon have to endure, if you stick with your instinct to block out the real facts. Even the DBs are not going to have a nice life. The whole civilization has gone mad.

Help! HELP!

-- Mary W Maxwell declares that her article here, and her books from 1984 through 2022, are public domain. She wants to be contacted at MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com. If you are in need of a laugh, please click the link below.