(Thanks, C. :)
Apparently from Charles Miller,though from an unexpected e-mail address:
=====
Dear Hobie.
Please find Monograph below providing tools for understanding and applying legalized force to public servants.
The rules in a law suit requires ever allegation to be addressed in a limited manner.
Rule 8 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Defenses; Admissions and Denials.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation—other than one relating to the amount of damages—is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided~'
Defenses; Admissions and Denials.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation—other than one relating to the amount of damages—is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided
Now, you characters operating the Peoples government admit or deny the allegations or say you don’t know or show your excuse.
Either way you characters go you convict your self. Negligence, breach of trust and employment contract, at a minimum while taking money from the government under false pretenses and failure to provide honest services.
PUBLIC SERVANTS AS DEFENDANTS
DEFENDANTS
INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS
First Defendant, Joe Biden, alleged President, is a self professed public servant to the People of the States United, servant to the Peoples laws of constitutions under public promise, duly accepted by electors by Congress when as a body it refused to investigate fraud charges and ratified Joe Biden as President.
Joe Biden as the Chief Executive Officer, oath given, pledged surety, required by constitution, “ … and shall see that the laws are faithfully executed.”
Joe Biden knows and has always known The States United constitution is the Peoples law.
Joe Biden knows and has always known The States United first law is its Constitution, particularly the Preamble identifying the true Authority creating , by ordination, the United States of America as government, which is controlled by Bill of Rights
Joe Biden knows and has always known the Peoples Bill of Rights reserves inviolate forever the THOU SHALL NOT TRESPASS declarations are the first laws to be faithfully executed by every public servant.
Joe Biden knows and has always known that every act by every public servant or employee of the United States Government, in order to valid, is absolutely required to be in full and complete accord with powers defined in Article I section 8 of the Constitution and Bill of Rights controlling the People’s Constitution for the United States of America.
Joe Biden as alleged President knows and has always known executive and police powers of United States may only be applied in full accord with lawful statutes.
Joe Biden knows and has always known that his personal fidelity bond, oath required of all public servants, contains no discretion concerning personal obligations to the People’s law of the Constitution.
Second Defendant, Antony J. Blinken , Secretary of State, self professed public servant to the People of the States United, servant to the Peoples laws of constitutions under public promise, fidelity bond recognized as the oath.
Antony J. Blinken is holder and exclusive custodian of the Great Seal of the United States of America.
Antony J. Blinken is the official record keeper for both the legislative and executive branches of United States government.
Antony J. Blinken knows and has always known the Great Seal is to be applied only to official acts authorized by States United Constitution, and conversely no act not in complete accord with the constitution may never carry the Great Seal.
Third Defendant, Merrick Brian Garland, Attorney General for the United States of America, self professed public servant to the People of States United, servant to the People’s law of constitutions under public promise, personal fidelity bond, oath required of all public servants, contains no discretion concerning personal obligations to the People’s law of the Constitution.
Merrick Brian Garland, is the legal advisor to all federal offices and officers, knowing and always having known, that all legal advice provided is absolutely required to be in complete accord with the States United Constitution as amended by the Bill of Rights.
FAIR NOTICE TO DOES 1 to 5000.
Plaintiffs recognize many federal public servants and state government employees are subject to superiors orders, political agendas, and outside influences. Also recognized is the fact that many times the orders of superiors or perceived superior parties, are not fully in compliance with the People’s laws of our Constitutions, both state and federal.
While performing illegal acts under orders or influence is not a defense, Plaintiffs recognize any one may make a mistake.
Any and all defendant does or possible defendant does are offered the opportunity to join as plaintiffs under Court Rule 19, and report what they have witnessed while receiving a pay check requiring absolute loyalty to the People of Washington and the Peoples laws of Constitutions.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
Individual defendants are sued in individual capacity, individually identified or of the class of does.
No defendant qualifies for official immunity provided by public office, and each knows that such immunity claim must be substantiated, first, from constitutions, second, good standing lawful statutes, third public record memorializing of facts proving compliance with the specific language contained in the Constitution as amended and controlled by the Bill of Rights.
All defendants are public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing all Citizens, particularly plaintiffs herein and herewith are Beneficiaries, Grantors to and of the source and authority, to and for all governmental powers and operations.
All defendants are public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing that breach of public trust is a crime requiring resignation, impeachment, when shown on public records.
Each defendant claims to be an honest public servant holding various positions in the the national government structure, serving plaintiffs the American People.
Each individually identified defendant, and all class defendants, accepted the position of public servant, accepted consideration for services, assumed public office knowing that;
A. Public service employment is a privilege, not a right;
B. Public service employment is subject to a personal loyalty pledge, fidelity bond, bound to to the law of the People’s Constitution for the United States of America as required by Article VI.
C. Public service training, prior to assumption of public duties, informs every public servant of professional standards required for honest performance of public duties.
D. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office must be in complete accord with personal pledge, service contract terms of undivided loyalty to the highest law, United States Constitution as Amended.
E. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office is subject to audit for compliance with all the laws, regulations, rules, particularly the Bill of a Rights and recognition that the Preamble to the Constitution which identifies the owners of the national government as the American People, plaintiffs herein.
F. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office, in order to be considered valid, must be provable from public records, to be authorized by law.
F 1. The law making body of the States United is the Legislative Branch..
F 2. Neither the Executive Branch nor the Judicial Branch are authorized by their
constitution to make law nor interpret the Constitution because no such
jurisdiction granted by the Constitution.
F 3. The Legislative powers created by the People as plaintiffs do-not identify the
People as either subjects nor objects under the powers of Legislative preview.
F 4. Legitimate government functions of the United States government rely
exclusively on Consent of the Governed.
F 5. All individual defendants, named specifically or of the class of does, is strictly
limited to specific powers delegated by the Peoples Constitutions.
F 6. No defendant, individually identified or of the class of does, is assigned
discretion in context of promised performance while serving in public office,
particularly considering duties to the fidelity to the Constitution for the United
States of America as amended and controlled by its Bill of Rights.
G. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, each and every act or omission committed while operating in public office, that is not supported and proved valid by operation of law, and public records, is a personal act.
H. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, agreement to be subject to the criminal laws of the United States and of the States is accepted as fundamental terms of public service.
I. Public records created by or participated in constructing are full faith and credit,
official government records.
J. Public records are not deniable under any circumstance.
k. Argument with or denial of facts of public record is knowing and intentional admission and confession of fatally defective public service, a false misleading, deceptive, act known to be a breach of public trust and a felony, under both state and federal law.
L. No one, particularly government servants may claim ignorance of the law as a defense for acts shown by public record to be in violation of Constitutions, Bill of Rights or good standing, lawful statutes.
M. Refusal to provide any American, particularly plaintiffs herein and herewith, access to, benefit of, enforcement of, recognition of, the law protecting rights under the Bill of Rights, are always a Civil Rights Crime.
N. All attempts to deny public records exposing, or proving, deviations from, failures to perform as promised, according to law, is the conclusive evidence of intent to act in Divided Loyalty, breach of public trust, breach of oath, breach employment contract, public service standards and honest services laws, resulting in self confessed criminal intent.
O. Any or all government actors, franchises of government operating under license to do business in interstate commerce, that protect, coverup for, support defective public servants or their acts and omissions, join a conspiracy, attempting SUBVERSION, the attempt to transform the established, lawful structure, legal standards and obligations, political order, social order and the structures of power, authority, hierarchy, and social norms of governments created by the People beginning 1776, July 4, a conspiracy admitted by public record as fair notice before the world.
P. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified as does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express in any manner, particularly from a public servants position control or alleged control over any or all, of the Peoples political will represented in a vote, the People’s bodies, is execution of an ownership position.
Q. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified and does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express ownership in a Citizens vote or body, and control over same, is an act by color if law indicating Involuntary Servitude, Slavery.
R. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified and does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express ownership in a Citizens vote or body, and control over same, is an act by color if law admitting full, complete, unlimited, indefensible liability for every affect or effect experience by the subject of such control.
S. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always
known that, failures or refusals to comply with the written, specifics defining
general and specific powers or authorities for government operations, declared by Constitutions and reservations of rights controlling, is a personal act which each defendant is personally liable with out limit. Each defendant is advised of this fact
upon assumption of public trust employment.
T. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always
known that, special privileges in the form of systemic protections with in the class
of public servants is a high civil rights crime.
U. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always
known that, the NUREMBERG DEFENSE, I HAD ORDERS, will not protect them
individually or collectively no matter what some other public servant says or does, particularly justices, judges or their BAR brother attorneys, from day one of the life of the United States of America, and it’s administrative body known as the United States Government.
*************************************************************
