The W.H.O.'s "World Together," My Arse

by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

It was enlightening to watch the speech by Dr Joad Madjeur in a film that James Corbett captured into his #417 video about the proposed global treaty on pandemics.

I sure got a Eureka moment when that doctor declared that WHO has now found the way to really, really keep the whole species healthy (by this treaty, of course). He solemnly revealed the magic name, which is unlike the dull-sounding and much skepticized phrase "new world order." What is the new name? It is "The World Together."

World together, my arse. The proposed "world together" does not even bother to disguise the fact that it is a blueprint for world tyranny. Someone at the top will dictate everything -- sounds coming from the population will not be heard. No provision has even been made for a means of altering that system, down the road.

There will also be "clonism." To be together we'll all have to be alike. Remember the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony in 2008? Drums were played by 2008 men, all to precisely the same beat. It was perfect harmony, if that's your idea of harmony.

Dear reader, this article is not about tyranny; I'm here to discuss language. Th Eureka moment I had when Dr Madjeur intoned the new phrase "The World Together" consisted of my realizing how a moral word can override any thought of how bad the item actually is. If Madjeur says he is doing philanthropy when he is doing mass murder, the philanthropy flavor sticks.

Language and the Brain

Evolutionary biologists are in disagreement as to when human language began and how it first developed. But we can agree that when it arrived, it arrived on top of other existing brain functions. Presumably the animal functions of the human had already come about -- we had the necessary instincts and emotions to assure personal survival and reproduction.

We also had, as other primates have, highly patterned participation in social relations. Humans could get by quite well on this earth without language, thank you. Hunters could hunt, leaders could be obeyed, "contracts" could be fulfilled -- all by gesture, body language, facial expression, and so forth.

If someone back then -- say, the caveman version of Dr Madjeur -- had wanted to deceive everyone about some plan he was cooking up, he couldn't have swayed his listeners by words. Still, when words finally did get invented, they must have fit comfortably onto the human's repertoire of behavior. How else would they have any meaning?

So when I saw the real Dr Madjeur selling his "togetherness" wares (in the Corbett video), I had the sinking feeling that he would succeed, at least with most citizens. After all, there's something quite emotional about us being "all together" -- connected like family, or friends supporting one another.

I hereby speculate that Dr Joad Madjeur is calling on at least three of our pre-language features. First, there is the human sense of belonging to one's group -- it lets you take pride in what your ancestral group has done ("I'm Greek, I'm great."), and simply being in a crowd feels good.

Second, there is the instinct for altruism, which sociobiologists say derived from maternal care. Undoubtedly, human are altruistic. Listeners to Dr Madjeur would be pleased at the idea of everyone getting a fair shot. (Pun not intended.)

Bigness

The third feature of the human brain that might tune into the world-together idea, is our habit of universalizing things. Ideas just grow and grow. There must be a predisposition in the neocortex that sends an idea looking for a way to max it. A simple example: if every nation has a champion runner, shouldn't we search for the world's best runner?

Thought has its own rules -- intellectuals feel bad if they stop short of the widest possible application of a concept. Recall the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, a great document that did much to enlighten and empower. Today we have some bureaucrats in Geneva trying to establish by decree a universal authority in medical affairs. What If hundreds of local doctors scream "No" about a pandemic? WHO says: Just ignore them, or imprison them.

Note: Paul Craig Roberts has pointed out that we've got a US Department of Homeland Security saying that it can sweep the nation to find and destroy any falseness. (DHS should take a selfie of itself, don't you think?) Never mind that the way to find truth has always involved investigation, argumentation, comparison, etc. Don't need that no mo'.

Since I am pretty ignorant of neuroanatomy, I can't say how such a penchant for universalizing came about, but maybe it is just based on the way animals naturally see big things as being more impressive than small things.

Murder, She Said

Above, I claimed that if Dr Madjeur yaks "philanthropy," when he is really talking about mass murder, the philanthropy flavor sticks. I don't entirely attribute that to a pre-language feature of the brain. I think our love of goody-goody stuff came later. I'm guessing that first we had language, then used it to develop moral principles via religion or philosophy and settled, culturally, on the idea of human goodness. "America, America, God shed His grace on thee, And crown thy good with brotherhood..."

Crown thy good? Hello? Yes. We seem dead set on thinking that a nation, and especially its government, can rise to greatness. Ergo, when Dr Madjeur says that the WHO can be the provider of very nice things, we lose our critical ability. The flavor of philanthropy sticks. Really, we must educate people about this slip of the neurons -- if that's what it is.

How did the WHO, or its parent, the United Nations, arise? The Rockefellers were leaders in the founding of the UN, and the WHO involves the usual suspects in the medical world, including Big Pharma and AMA-type bullies. Note: Congress needs to shoot -- at least with a water pistol -- the laws that let billionaires create foundations as tax havens.

Murder and the Thesaurus

I have a hunch that the British physician who wrote Roget's thesaurus, namely Dr Peter Roget (1779-1869), knew more than his prayers. I think his book may have been part of some work that was going on behind the scenes by our hidden masters. ("What an odd conspiracy theory, Mary, have you no shame?")

There's no room for me to rehearse my theory here, but I think Roget knew that most words sit on top of knowledge that we, as animals, already possess -- just from perceiving our natural surround. Go check and you will see how Roget laid out the book, into which he fit exactly 1000 categories.

For now, since this article is my protest against the menacing new phrase "world together" -- as well as the more humdrum "world order," I will print out the synonyms that Roget gave for the noun "murder." After that, I list synonyms for the colloquial verb "to bump off," as found in a modernized collection at Thesaurus.com.

The Noun, murder -- synonyms:

killing, slaying, homicide, assassination, execution, manslaughter, extermination, slaughter, hit, massacre, butchery, liquidation, offing, foul play, wasting, patricide, matricide, fratricide, regicide, rubout, bloodshed, lynching, massacre, dispatching, clintoning (nah, just kidding about the Clintons).

The verb, to bump off -- colloquial:

blot out, blow away, chill, dispose of, do in, dust, grease, ice, knock off, polish off, snuff, snuff out, stretch, waste, whack, wipe out, zap, murder by vaccination (kidding? nah, not kidding).

Conclusion

I plead with everyone to realize that we are vulnerable not just to sheer force (which surely is coming) but are vulnerable to words.

We must get rid of that disgustingly manipulative new phrase "world together." Back in the 1970s, we should have nipped in the bud the word "terrorist." It led to bad legislation and then staged terrorist acts, followed by even bolder legislation (bye-bye to privacy, fair trials, etc.)

There is such a thing as truth. There is such a thing as discerning what's going on. Dogs bark. Grass is green. Two and two really, truly, add up to four. Two and two do not in any way, shape, or form add up to five.

There really is a Clinton body count; look it up. There really was a stolen election in 2020. There really was a deliberate genocide of Iraqis by Americans in 2003 and the whole world knows it.

Government is not there to help you -- it is run, behind the scenes, as a racket with a wholly different purpose. Geo-engineering is as real as rain. Covid was planned, right down to the last comma.

The FBI bombed the Marathon. Nobody shot anybody at Sandy Hook. Alex Jones is a plant to confuse people and make them think someone is standing up to the perfidious bastards.

If you are not standing up to the perfidious bastards you are a lazy, lousy citizen and you will get what's coming to you.

Haven't you always known in your heart that the purpose of shoe-removal at the airport is to degrade you? It conditions you to say "Yes, sir, yes, sir, three bags full, sir, is there anything else I could do for you, sir?"

Last chance: storm your statehouse, storm the church, storm your neighbors who are glued to their TV, arrest Fauci and Gates immediately, wake up, protect the children. You know better than to accept garbage from the WHO, the DHS, and a coterie of psychopaths.

Words don't fool you. You understand reality. We all do, and there are 330 million of us, each possessing two fists; that's 660 million fists. That's a lot of fists.