Thanks Tiger. Well said, too..

Lynda

****************************

Max,

You wrote a very cohesive and thorough analysis of what if this is Operation Trust, the best I have seen. I tend to think the Black Hats are not creative enough to apply themselves -- "Work!" to quote Maynard G. Krebs -- they despise work, they believe they are above all that. If they have to get something done, also, they don't trust competent people (they could not build an O-Care health website), instead they trust their bloodline relatives. In all their speeches one sees no reasoning or details, one only sees virtue signalling. They lost 2016 to Trump because they were overconfident in their method of cheating, which by my reports was done hacking servers in the US that totaled the votes and was turned, by one report, by threatening CIA HQ with a nuclear attack (with jets buzzing Langley) if the hack was not turned off. They tried not to make that mistake again, hence the servers overseas in 2020. Overconfidence and disdain seem to be rampant among them, their value system is, they want to do the least to get the most, that is what they feel good about.

I could be wrong about all this, but that is my hypothesis based on observation.

Consequently, the more laborious detail added to a report, since they resent labor, the more credibility I generally start to attach.

I would like you to consider, and ask you if you can suspend disbelief for a bit, much like in 'Miracle on 34th Street', in which Natalie Wood says "I believe, I believe, I Know it's Silly, but I Believe" and comment on the free book at

https://u1lib.org/book/19211069/653d58

Which is a post-Disclosure discussion of corrective measures. Your analytic approach would provide the author some worthy feedback.

TIGER