(Thanks, C. :)

Reader Charles Miller now writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'Charles Miller -- Common ....

PART 2, 3/25/2022

RESPONSE TO ANNAs CONFUSIONS.

Thank you again Hobie for your honorable service to open dialogue.

Thank you Anna V. for your second Admission and Confession, so wonderfully phrased in the bait and switch magicians trick of watch this hand while the other steals the watch.
Confirmation of Judgement from your own pen perhaps?
The confusions you present have nothing to do with actually producing verifications of your claims. Changing the subject matter to something, any thing, other than simply showing some bona fides, is right out of the manual for subversives that has trained so many of the current crop of personalities substituting for honest public servants.

I have my doubts that mastery over selling confusion by bait and switch operations will be of much value in the near future,

Anna, you could crush me and all others challenging your illusionary narratives by a few simple acts.
1. Show us poor stupid Americans where and how We the People consented to be ruled over by you and your cohorts. Of course that would require full disclosure of all relevant material facts and law so that us dummies could figure out what We consented to.
2. Perhaps you might show us poor stupid Americans how and under what procedure you captured not only our government, yet more to the point the capture of the deep state corporations you claim to be so well informed about.
In my world knowledge of a fraud and continually associating with it in any manner is considered a badge of fraud. More to the point the law systems developed over the last few thousand years all agree associating with a fraud and taking a benefit of the fraud qualifies as principal in the fraud.
You might want to review what you have been selling.
3. Disclosure of all relevant arterial facts law and procedures that placed you in a fiduciaries position to all of us ignorant Americans, might be way to actually prove your claims. Identifying who and how you were appointed by, to a fiduciaries position and over what and who might go a long way to resolving some of the confusions you are so masterful at creating.
I am pretty sure for a fiduciary position to be considered valid the contract or agreement must be in evidence before any one could recognize a fiduciary position or claim of one.
4. Anna, if what you claim has even 1% truth, your acts affect every American.
Perhaps you could explain to all of We the People, why you would not be personally responsible to all of us for your actions and liable for damages.
This point is particularly relevant in context of your secret squirrel world operations that you refuse to disclose.
I know herds of Americans that do not appreciate being treated as surfs by our public servants.
I am absolutely positive these same Americans will never consent to the hegemony you claim you and your cohorts admit is the future if you all get the control you promise.

The internet is forever. We are all known by what we do there without escape.

***************************************************************************