(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles Miller writes:
Please find below PART 1 of 2 addressing root jurisdiction issues in relation to federal controls over the People.
PART 2, PUBLISHED separately please, is the Memorandum of Fact and Law issued by any one of People from the position of the Sovereign.
SOVEREIGN identified as State Citizen.
The so called AMERICAN NATIONAL identifier is a slaves admission of self defined slavery.
This is because, when the Master, the American People, define them selves and their political and legal identities from definitions by their servants, the descent into the public servants jurisdiction abandons the Peoples Original Jurisdiction.
Why would any one use an inferior jurisdiction to define the superior jurisdiction?
How is that even possible? Servants defining Masters powers is insanity!
Part 2 first two paragraphs sets this point up perfectly.
I attach as proof of fact the authority to issue JUDGEMENT by the People to our public servants. The Yick Wo v. Hopkins ORDER to all public servants has never been overturned or challenged.
This is because the FACTS declared are the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND recognized by Article VI section 1.
Article VI sections 2 & 3 CAPTURE completely of every public servant, all they supervise which attaches personally to every government actor and contractor TAKING A PAY CHECK BACKED BY GOVERNMENT FUNDS.
Beneficiaries promised a while ago we would present real tools to address some of our countries confusions. These 2 Monographs are part of keeping our promise.
We the Beneficiaries INVITE all the patridiot gurus, the self qualified X-Perts on corruption to engage in recognizing that all their talking about the corruption simply feeds the confusions.
What could be possible if all the energy used talking about corruption was concentrated on solutions available as found at the Supreme Law defined at Article VI and controlled by Bill of Rights Amendments.
REVOCATION OF ELECTION TO BE TAXED, MEMORANDUM SEPARATE.
Monday, April 3, 2017
United States Post, Registered Mail #:
RE: REVOCATION OF ELECTION TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A TAX PAYER
Nunc Pro Tunc, (
date or about date of first pay check
REF: 1. Executed Exemption, below,;
2. Amendment IX;
3. Annexed Memorandum of Obligations and Duties;
4. Disclosure Required, 5 USC sec. 551 et. seq.;
5. U.S Constitution, Article I sec. 8, Authorities.
TO; 1. Treasurer of the United States
2. IRS Commissioner see org chart
3. TIGTA legal council
4. Ombudsman see org chart
(Addressed to each with 2 moving to 1 putting 1 at 4 till all are in position1.)
To Whom it May Concern:
, do hereby knowingly and intentionally revoke my alleged election as a voluntary US Taxpayer as promised in to be recognized at 26 USC §6013(g) for good cause of non disclosure and deception from the beginning.
I have never received full nor complete notice of all relevant material facts and law, the notice and opportunity to respond, qualifying as due process, that is required to gain my consent to be governed, particularly taxed.
I have reviewed the powers of the United States relevant to its legislative powers. There is no authority granted by Constitution for the Legislature to subject me to federal statutes or codes, because the People are not identified by Constitution as either subjects nor objects to legislatively ruled.
YOU WILL: correct my status, to that of TAX EXEMPT, immediately, in all relevant databases accessible to the United States Treasury, execute as described in 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(a) as having revoked the status of voluntary US Taxpayer, nunc pro tunc.
YOU WILL: return to me any funds which have been withheld by you in my name under the Social Security identifier
, as described in 26 U.S. Code § 6401(b)(2) and consider this revocation to be in force going forward as described in 26 USC §6013(g)(6).
Please provide me an Audited under Seal Statement of Account from the beginning of unauthorized takings of my property, taxes in the form of money, under IRC Code. This is a FOIA REQUEST because Congress is not authorized under Article I sec. 8 of the United States Constitution to regulate or tax the People in the States.
YICK WO v HOPKINS. 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are sup- [118 U.S. 356, 370] posed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration, the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion, or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, (Article VI) which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the government of the commonwealth 'may be a government of laws and not of men.' For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.