[ DONATE TO RMN ] [ View Thread ] [ Return to Main Page ] [ Read Prev Article ] [ Read Next Article ] [ CGI Media News Room ] [ SUBSCRIBE TO RMN ]

RMN is Reader Supported

Our Goal for
JUN 6 - JUL 5:

Powered by FundRazr

Click Widget
or Click Here to contribute.

Checks & Money Orders:

Raye Allan Smith
P.O. Box 95
Ashtabula, OH 44005

Users Online:

Who Founded RMNews?

Dewitt Jones' Video
"Celebrate What's Right
With The World"

"When the
Starships Fly!"

Listen at YouTube

The Theme for The Obergon Chronicles

Listen at YouTube

The Obergon Chronicles ebook


Common Ground
Independent Media









Kevin Courtois - Kcbjedi

Dr Robin Falkov


Melinda Pillsbury Hr1

Melinda Pillsbury Hr2


Daneen Peterson


Daneen Peterson


Disclosure Hr1

Disclosure Hr2



Jasmine Hr1
Jasmine Hr2

Tom Chittum Hr1
Tom Chittum Hr2

Kevin Courtois

Dr Syberlux

Gary Larrabee Hr1
Gary Larrabee Hr2

Kevin Courtois

Pravdaseeker Hr1
Pravdaseeker Hr2


Tom Chittum

Crystal River

Stewart Swerdlow Hr1
Stewart Swerdlow Hr2

Janet Swerdlow Hr1
Janet Swerdlow Hr2

Dr. Robin Falkov Hr1
Dr. Robin Falkov Hr2
Dr. Robin Falkov Hr3

JANUARY 2009 ______________



Crystal River


Dr. Robin Falcov



Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies, Spirituality,
Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room

Flawed Presumption: Re: Pfizer mRNA "Vaccine" Trials: All Injected Mothers Lost Their Unborn Babies

Posted By: JediShaman
Date: Monday, 31-Jan-2022 16:10:33

In Response To: Pfizer mRNA "Vaccine" Trials: All Injected Mothers Lost Their Unborn Babies (SpaceCommando)

This story actually shows that at minimum about 10% of the pregnancies involved losing the baby, with no reported pregnancy outcome for the rest - which could be due to the reporting not following up at the conclusion of full term 9 month pregnancies. If the shots actually caused most women to miscarry then you would see that in the general population - which hasn't occurred. For women under 30 the normal miscarriage rate is about 10%, and 20% for women between 30 and 40. Thus, there is no evidence yet from the trial that the shots correlated with an unusually high rate of miscarriage. If a study is done over 6 months and pregnancies last 9 months then of course you may not have data on the successful pregnancies. It seems that people looking for evidence against Pfizer have failed to consider this data in a rational way. It is possible that the full data from all the pregnancies might show an elevation in failed pregnancies, but stating that 100% of reported outcomes were babies lost is meaningless and misleading. An effort is needed to inquire about the reason for the missing data, and ideally those outcomes can be obtained to then provide meaningful data. If Pfizer is trying to skew results to hide deaths it doesn't help to skew reporting in the opposite way to exaggerate deaths.

: By Dr Mark Trozzi - January 31, 2022

: Pfizer trial documents reveal attempts to cover up the death
: of 100 percent of unborn babies in outcomes actually
: reported

: Please recall our November 23, 2021 post titled “The FDA and
: Pfizer are a Match Made in Hell”.

: There we described how the FDA took only 108 days to approve
: Pfizer’s injection, but wanted 55 years to produce the
: documents!

: Thankfully Public Health and Medical Professionals for
: Transparency filed a lawsuit after the FDA denied their
: request to expedite the release of the records, and the
: records are being released, albeit still too slowly.

: Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a
: ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event
: Reports’ describing events reported to Pfizer up until
: February 2021. You can download this entire report here.

: Look at table 6 from this Pfizer report. It is titled “Missing
: Information”. Its first heading under the topic “Missing
: Information” is “Use in pregnancy and lactation”. It
: includes this paragraph: “Pregnancy outcomes for the 270
: pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23),
: outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death,
: spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each),
: spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal
: outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238
: pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported
: for each twin, and both were counted).”

: On the surface this states that of 270 pregnancies, there were
: 23 spontaneous abortions, 5 “outcomes pending”, 2 premature
: birth with neonatal death, 2 spontaneous abortions with
: intrauterine death, 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal
: death, and 1 normal outcome. But note also “no outcome was
: provided for 238 pregnancies”.

: So really we have no idea what happened with 243 (5 + 238) of
: the pregnancies of these injected women; they have just not
: been included in the report. What we do know is that of 27
: reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead
: babies! This appears to mean that someone was pregnant with
: twins and that 100 percent of the unborn babies died.

: Here is an excellent article by LifeSite News which goes into
: greater depth about these shocking revelations. LifeSite
: News cuts Pfizer some slack on the 5 “outcomes pending”
: which creates the possible impression that 87.5 percent of
: the babies of the injected women died. With all respect to
: LifeSite, I feel correct in not counting the 5 “outcomes
: pending” and hence arrive at the conclusion that 100
: percent of the unborn babies died in the injected women for
: whom results are presented.

: The LifeSite News article also reveals deceptive number games
: in another article titled “Safety and Efficacy of the
: BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine”, which was published in the
: New England Journal of Medicine on December 31, 2020.

: These deceptive practices attempted to cover up the fact that
: in first trimester pregnancies, the Pfizer injection
: produced 82 percent miscarriages.

: On January 12th we shared the excellent analysis by the
: Canadian Covid Care Alliance of this same “Safety and
: Efficacy” article from the New England Journal of Medicine.
: This Pfizer-friendly study is a complete sham; it is
: replete with misrepresentation and deceptive methods. The
: deception and truth is revealed in detail in this video and
: article by the CCCA.

: Dr Trozzi’s brief and Dr Nagase’s excellent interview
: discussing this sham article is here.

: They’re killing babies; what can we do?

: These injections are criminal; period. Help us serve the Cease
: and Desist Declaration of the World Council for Health, to
: any and all governments, clinics, hospitals, medical
: regulatory bodies, doctors, nurses, politicians, or anyone
: participating in any way in the manufacture, shipping,
: distribution, promotion, or administration of these
: injections.

: The message to anyone involved in these injection campaigns is
: “Stop now. This is a crime. You will be criminally and
: civilly responsible. The cat is out of the bag. Justice is
: coming.” . . .

: [SNIP]

If you enjoyed this article,
Please consider a monthly subscription to Rumor Mill News!!

RMN is an RA production.

Articles In This Thread

The only pay your RMN moderators receive
comes from ads.
Please consider putting RMN in
your ad blocker's whitelist.

Serving Truth and Freedom
Worldwide since 1996
Politically Incorrect News
Stranger than Fiction
Usually True!

by FundRazr
Click Widget
or Click Here to contribute.

Organic Sulfur 4 Health



Provided free to RMN Agents

Organic Sulfur 4 Health



Provided free to RMN Agents

[ DONATE TO RMN ] [ View Thread ] [ Return to Main Page ] [ Read Prev Article ] [ Read Next Article ] [ CGI Media News Room ] [ SUBSCRIBE TO RMN ]

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room is maintained by Forum Admin with WebBBS 5.12.