CirstenW has often cited stories from RealRawNews as good intel. During one of her live feeds, a poster in the chat crawl apparently disparaged RealRawNews. She responded on her Telegram channel:

"this idiot said RealRawNews is This website contains humor, parody, and satire. ...but left this Out>We have included this disclaimer for our protection, on the advice on legal counsel....Its like many that misquote the Bible and take things out of context and leave out huge chunks>ITS BEARING FALSE WITNESS FOLKS!!"

However, the disclaimer in question, also cited by Mr.Ed as being an indicator of veracity, can really be taken either way, and similar disclaimers can quite often be found on websites generally recognized as publishing fake news or fan fiction, etc. If someone named in a fake story is claimed to have done something they didn't do, that's the most likely reason such a website would be sued.

But, I would be okay with the RRN stories turning out to be true. We just need some independent verification, or at least someone like CirstenW to tell us she knows details which she can't share with us that nevertheless convince her the stories are true.