Snip

MIT Israeli Scientist on Going Against the COVID-19 Vaccine “Mainstream” Narrative: “You Have to be Careful Because You Could be Eliminated”

Dr. Retsef Levi is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management. He was one of the featured speakers last week in Washington D.C. during Senator Ron Johnson’s Roundtable Discussion on COVID-19 Vaccine mandates. We have published the presentations from many of the other participants that attended this meeting hosted by Senator Johnson. See:

Doctors and COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Testify in Washington D.C. to Crimes Against Humanity – CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci are No Shows

Dr. Levi is pro-vaccine, and has an impressive bio as a scientist and professor at MIT Sloan School of Management.

Retsef Levi is the J. Spencer Standish (1945) Professor of Operations Management at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is a member of the Operations Management Group at MIT Sloan and affiliated with the MIT Operations Research Center. Levi also serves as the Faculty Co-Director of the MIT Leaders for Global Operations (LGO).

Before coming to MIT, he spent a year in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center as the holder of the Goldstine Postdoctoral Fellowship.

He received a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Tel-Aviv University (Israel) in 2001, and a PhD in Operations Research from Cornell University in 2005.

Levi spent almost 12 years in the Israeli Defense Forces as an officer in the Intelligence Wing and was designated as an Extra Merit Officer. After leaving the Military, Levi joined an emerging new Israeli hi-tech company as a Business Development Consultant.

Levi’s current research is focused on the design of analytical data-driven decision support models and tools addressing complex business and system design decisions under uncertainty in areas such as health and healthcare management, supply chain, procurement and inventory management, revenue management, pricing optimization and logistics.

Levi has been leading several industry-based collaborative research efforts with some of the major academic hospitals in the Boston area, such as Mass General Hospital (MGH), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Children’s Hospital, and across the U.S. (e.g., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NYC Presbyterian Hospital System and the American Association of Medical Colleges).

Levi was the PI on an MIT contract with the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) to develop systematic risk management approach to address risk related to economically motivated adulterations of food manufactured in global supply chains.

Levi has graduated 10 PhD students, 34 Master students and 6 postdoctoral fellows. He was also awarded several prestigious teaching awards. (Full bio here.)

As you can see, he has plenty of experience in drug development and working with the FDA.

And yet, similar to the frontline physicians who have now sent declarations to the FDA, CDC, and HHS, his concerns about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines have been ignored.

He stated:

I’m not an anti-vaxxer. I’m not a Republican, I’m not a Democrat.

I just happen to be a scientist that challenges the current narrative that dominates public health policies around the world and in the U.S. and in Israel.

I can tell you that I know many mainstream scientists and medical professionals, who similar to me, think that the current narrative is extreme and wrong.

But very few of them are willing to speak up.

And I’m not sure I can blame them, because any attempt to deviate from the narrative today is faced with a wall of hostility, rejection, and even elimination from the government, including funding agencies, from public media, and worst of all, from the scientific community itself.

Dr. Levi then states that a colleague of his at MIT who is a member of the National Academy of Engineering told him:

“You have to be careful, because you can be eliminated.”

Dr. Levi then goes on to talk about academic fraud and how he and many other scientists saw right away that what Pfizer was publishing about the results of their COVID-19 vaccine trials was seriously flawed, and that their statements regarding efficacy were wrong.

And we now also have a whistleblower who worked on the COVID-19 vaccine trials for Pfizer who has also exposed the fraud at Pfizer. See:

Whistleblower Reveals Fraud in Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials as 5 to 11-Year-Olds Begin to be Injected – Vaccine Deaths and Injuries to Follow

These scientists tried to get their critiques of the Pfizer studies published in the academic journals, but were denied. The only studies published were the ones that conformed to the mainstream narrative, and these studies were basically pure junk.

Dr. Levi gives the example of the studies that were just recently published to state that the new booster shots were effective and safe. Most of the patients given the shots in the trials were only followed for less than two weeks in order for the drug companies to declare the vaccines are safe and effective.

He is very critical of these journals, because regarding safety, they are failing to report any negative side effects, including deaths.

Dr. Levi goes on to give an example of this academic censorship.

Me and my co-authors pointed out that when you look at national emergency services calls in Israel for cardiac arrest among young individuals under 40, you see a dramatic increase of 25% of these calls parallel to the vaccination campaign in Israel early in 2021, and we see a statistical association to that campaign.

We wrote the paper about that, NOT claiming that there’s a casual effect between the vaccines and what we see, because don’t have the proof for that.

But we did raise the concern, and we called authorities to check what is going on.

Needless to say, we never got a response from the authorities, and in fact, they went public and called this research “fake.”

But even more concerning, journal after journal after journal in the academic literature is rejecting this article, most of the time based on the argument that it is “not a priority.”

Well, I don’t think that calling safety concerns “fake” is morally right, or scientifically right.

I think it is clear that these vaccines are not naive, and they have serious and unprecedented side effects.

https://rumble.com/embed/vmawox/?pub=4