(Thanks, C. :)

Reader Charles Miller writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader: 'I strongly suggest everyone read ....

Dear Hobie.

RESPONSE TO READ THREE CONSTITUTIONS.

Every one seems to forget the fundamentals of contract as law when discussing the so called three constitutions.

The original 1787 constitution is the only valid and lawful contract which was amended, controlled, by the Bill of Rights. Identify the contract, the parties to it, the beneficiaries and benefits derived, the obligations and duties owed by whom. Then the clouds in the cess pool begin to clear up.

The proof to this statement is the fact that the other alleged constitutions are creations of servants operating in the name of the original constitutions authorities.

The essential question then becomes “ by what authority” are these alleged corporate constitutions or territorial attachment constitutions representative of the will of the People and where did the People authorize their constructions.

Congress is not granted any legislative power application over any state. Congress is not authorized to create a corporation posing as a government.

Every one giving power to fraudulent actions become co-conspirators with the original fraud. Operating as a corporation does not mean the named as corporation is a valid properly constructed entity. Without complete records of the construction of a corporation being in evidence there is no valid corporation possible. No matter how many believe in a fraud and that the fraud produced a valid corporation the facts and law do not change.

***************************************************************************