(Thanks, S. :)

Reader Semi writes:

***************************************************************************

Reader: Cayman Chemicals Safety Data Sheet cla....

Quality of a News Media is among else witnessed, how well it copes with retracting blunders, which inevitably sometimes happen... For the good of your readers and writers you could publish this:

Cayman Chemical Safety Data Sheet for mixture of SM-102 with Chloroform lists dangers of Chloroform, and on page 3 it claims, that it contains harmless SM-102. This is standard practice of publishing Safety Data Sheet for chemical mixtures...

Jim Stone failed to include that page 3 in his image...

I've tried to notify Hal Turner Radio, not sure if they've read it, tried to notify Jim Stone, who copied it from Hal Turner, but Jim Stone does not read emails... About 20% of his digs are blunders, and it's not possible to send him correction... Use discernment... (His other digs are very valuable informations and it's worth to read it, despite some among them may be blunders...)

I've tried to post correction to RMN before, but it was rejected, maybe it was not worded politely enough? There were at least five or six articles, who again and again list or mention Cayman Chemical list of dangers of Chloroform to dispute SM-102 ...

I do not know, if SM-102 is safe, but I do know, that Cayman Chemical Safety Data Sheet claims, that it is safe (while they are not saying anything about injecting that), and they would risk a fine, if it was revealed otherwise and if they knew it...

And I do know, that these Mark of the Beast vaxxinations are dangerous and very evil, regardless if SM-102 is harmless or not... They were not killing enough, so the boosters will, when many carelessly experienced it was not enough harmful yet to all...?!

https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

πα1/2

***************************************************************************