A great deal of attention has been
focused on the Act of 1871 (which was actually repealed in 1874) and a great
many people have been running around willy-nilly making all sorts of claims
about this action, which all boils down to the creation of a Municipal
Corporation calling itself the Municipal Corporation of the District of
Columbia.
focused on the Act of 1871 (which was actually repealed in 1874) and a great
many people have been running around willy-nilly making all sorts of claims
about this action, which all boils down to the creation of a Municipal
Corporation calling itself the Municipal Corporation of the District of
Columbia.
The bad thing about there being such
an unauthorized corporation is that it could then spin-off endless franchises
for itself and cause no end of trouble, which is precisely what it has done.
an unauthorized corporation is that it could then spin-off endless franchises
for itself and cause no end of trouble, which is precisely what it has done.
But strictly speaking, if you assume
that the parties undertaking this activity had the right to do it, we have no
cause to complain; and if it affected only their own business operations, we
would have even less cause to complain.
that the parties undertaking this activity had the right to do it, we have no
cause to complain; and if it affected only their own business operations, we
would have even less cause to complain.
Yet, here we come to the crux of the
matter, and it lies in the Corporations Act of 1870, not the famous Act of 1871
which promptly fell on its nose.
matter, and it lies in the Corporations Act of 1870, not the famous Act of 1871
which promptly fell on its nose.
Did the Municipal Government or the
Territorial Government, either one, have any granted authority to create
Municipal or Territorial Corporations "for" us or to operate them "in our
names"?
Territorial Government, either one, have any granted authority to create
Municipal or Territorial Corporations "for" us or to operate them "in our
names"?
And the answer is no, they did not.
That right was delegated to our own
American Federal Republic. It was never vouchsafed to the Municipal United
States Government nor to the Territorial United States Government.
American Federal Republic. It was never vouchsafed to the Municipal United
States Government nor to the Territorial United States Government.
As a result, all these corporations
have been constructed on fraud and Breach of Trust, and are being operated
without valid charters in our names by foreign principals.
have been constructed on fraud and Breach of Trust, and are being operated
without valid charters in our names by foreign principals.
These entities must be returned to
our ownership, re-chartered, and made subject to our Public Law. Or liquidated
without recourse.
our ownership, re-chartered, and made subject to our Public Law. Or liquidated
without recourse.
This is required by every form of law
including the Roman Civil Law: once the fraud is discovered and objected to, it
must be corrected. The fraud has been discovered --- and it is not in the Act of
1871 per se. It's in the Corporations Law of 1870, which has allowed all these
other entities to exist.
including the Roman Civil Law: once the fraud is discovered and objected to, it
must be corrected. The fraud has been discovered --- and it is not in the Act of
1871 per se. It's in the Corporations Law of 1870, which has allowed all these
other entities to exist.
This is our Public Notice that this
fraud has occurred and that it involves misrepresentation of powers and
delegated authorities, similar names deceit, and usurpation in Breach of Trust.
There is no doubt that this has happened and there is no question what the
remedy must be.
fraud has occurred and that it involves misrepresentation of powers and
delegated authorities, similar names deceit, and usurpation in Breach of Trust.
There is no doubt that this has happened and there is no question what the
remedy must be.
We heartily object to all that has
been done "in our names" since 1860, when Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney
prohibited from holding public office in our actual government was put forward
as a candidate for offices pertaining to our foreign Territorial Subcontractor
and passed off as our American Federal Republic President.
been done "in our names" since 1860, when Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney
prohibited from holding public office in our actual government was put forward
as a candidate for offices pertaining to our foreign Territorial Subcontractor
and passed off as our American Federal Republic President.
Notice to Agents is Notice to
Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of
America
America
----------------------------
See this article and over 2900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
