By Anna Von Reitz
In ancient times, all proper names
were descriptions: Hector of Troy, Jeremiah the Prophet, Illius of Alexandria,
Merlin the Magician.
were descriptions: Hector of Troy, Jeremiah the Prophet, Illius of Alexandria,
Merlin the Magician.
In Celtic lands, names could take on
many descriptive forms, and could denote the name of the Clan which itself
includes many family names --just take a look at the families attached to the
Clan MacDonald-- each one of all those people could claim to be a "MacDonald",
but only one, the Clan Chieftain, could claim to be "the" MacDonald.
many descriptive forms, and could denote the name of the Clan which itself
includes many family names --just take a look at the families attached to the
Clan MacDonald-- each one of all those people could claim to be a "MacDonald",
but only one, the Clan Chieftain, could claim to be "the" MacDonald.
A certain superstition was common
about "giving away your name" similar to the resistance of American Indians to
being photographed. Many groups felt that a name was too precious and intimate
to be shared with the public, so they adopted "Totem Names" --- Queen Guinnivere
means "Queen Snow Owl" and King Arthur means "King Bear".
about "giving away your name" similar to the resistance of American Indians to
being photographed. Many groups felt that a name was too precious and intimate
to be shared with the public, so they adopted "Totem Names" --- Queen Guinnivere
means "Queen Snow Owl" and King Arthur means "King Bear".
Still, all in all, these names are
all descriptions, and not names used in the modern way.
all descriptions, and not names used in the modern way.
The Roman Empire had a vast and
well-orchestrated system of nomenclature designed to not only identify
individuals but also locate their origins and social status, but it gradually
fell into disuse, until in most places in Europe it was a distant memory.
well-orchestrated system of nomenclature designed to not only identify
individuals but also locate their origins and social status, but it gradually
fell into disuse, until in most places in Europe it was a distant memory.
In the Scandinavian countries other
conventions based on descriptive family relationships arose, as in, Olaf, Sven's
Son, becoming Olaf Svenson.
conventions based on descriptive family relationships arose, as in, Olaf, Sven's
Son, becoming Olaf Svenson.
Wherever the Roman Catholic Church
established beach heads, the names of church members were recorded as part of
the church's responsibilities for keeping track of baptisms, marriages, death
rites and so on. Their location did not have to be part of the name in most
cases, because the Church Parish described the location of most of the names
being recorded. Exceptions were bridegrooms, brides, and other visitors or
immigrants from other Parishes who occasionally were born or died outside their
home parish.
established beach heads, the names of church members were recorded as part of
the church's responsibilities for keeping track of baptisms, marriages, death
rites and so on. Their location did not have to be part of the name in most
cases, because the Church Parish described the location of most of the names
being recorded. Exceptions were bridegrooms, brides, and other visitors or
immigrants from other Parishes who occasionally were born or died outside their
home parish.
Additionally, the ancient custom of
adopting Christian names was practiced, by which someone given the name
"Marjorie Brown" was transformed into "Sister Plotsidia", or a man named
"Raymond Stuckbuilder" felt a particular closeness to Saint Peter and changed
his name to "Peter Stuckbuilder" with the blessings and recordkeeping of the
Church. These sorts of Christian name changes are still an accepted part of
Church tradition.
adopting Christian names was practiced, by which someone given the name
"Marjorie Brown" was transformed into "Sister Plotsidia", or a man named
"Raymond Stuckbuilder" felt a particular closeness to Saint Peter and changed
his name to "Peter Stuckbuilder" with the blessings and recordkeeping of the
Church. These sorts of Christian name changes are still an accepted part of
Church tradition.
Beginning with the Norman Conquest
governments again began serious cataloguing and recording the identities and
location of "subjects" whether nobles, free men, or serfs--- for administrative
purposes -- the names were still descriptive in nature, but additional effort
was made to nail down the individual identity of each bit of "property"
belonging to the Monarch for purposes of conscription, tax allotments, census
records, and so on.
governments again began serious cataloguing and recording the identities and
location of "subjects" whether nobles, free men, or serfs--- for administrative
purposes -- the names were still descriptive in nature, but additional effort
was made to nail down the individual identity of each bit of "property"
belonging to the Monarch for purposes of conscription, tax allotments, census
records, and so on.
Six hundred years later, naming
conventions had taken on distinctly more secular purposes. Not only did the
Monarchs of Europe need to keep track of their subjects in terms of name and
location for administrative purposes, they needed to catalogue the work and
wares of their able subjects.
conventions had taken on distinctly more secular purposes. Not only did the
Monarchs of Europe need to keep track of their subjects in terms of name and
location for administrative purposes, they needed to catalogue the work and
wares of their able subjects.
By the early 1700's circuit riders
were sent into every town and village to assign names to the inhabitants. It is
from this era that many occupation-related names arose: John, the Blacksmith
became John Black or John Smith, Adam, the Bookey who gave odds on horse races,
became Adam Horseman or Adam Bookey, and so on. Names like Baker, Forester,
Ploughman, Carpenter, and Hunter derive from this era. Still later, these Trade
Names would be recognized as Trademarks.
were sent into every town and village to assign names to the inhabitants. It is
from this era that many occupation-related names arose: John, the Blacksmith
became John Black or John Smith, Adam, the Bookey who gave odds on horse races,
became Adam Horseman or Adam Bookey, and so on. Names like Baker, Forester,
Ploughman, Carpenter, and Hunter derive from this era. Still later, these Trade
Names would be recognized as Trademarks.
The ownership of names has always
been problematic. The Monarchs, in their infinite megalomania, claimed that they
owned their subjects and the names of their subjects, and when the Trade Names
were assigned, they also assumed ownership of the "Trademarks", meaning the
Surnames and Signatures of their Subjects.
been problematic. The Monarchs, in their infinite megalomania, claimed that they
owned their subjects and the names of their subjects, and when the Trade Names
were assigned, they also assumed ownership of the "Trademarks", meaning the
Surnames and Signatures of their Subjects.
So, for example, if a man named Simon
Kingman, a British Subject, signed his own name to a Promissory Note, the King
or Queen of England technically became liable for his debt---- which meant that
he became liable for his every enterprise to the Monarch and all his business
enterprises belonged to the Monarch---who held his name and all his property
assets in trust and under his name, of course, and the Monarch could, at any
time, require him to pay his debts in full.
Kingman, a British Subject, signed his own name to a Promissory Note, the King
or Queen of England technically became liable for his debt---- which meant that
he became liable for his every enterprise to the Monarch and all his business
enterprises belonged to the Monarch---who held his name and all his property
assets in trust and under his name, of course, and the Monarch could, at any
time, require him to pay his debts in full.
Thus began the incursion of the
"royal estate" --- otherwise known as "real estate" into the realms of private
identity and private business and private enterprise in Europe.
"royal estate" --- otherwise known as "real estate" into the realms of private
identity and private business and private enterprise in Europe.
In America these practices and
assumptions were foisted off onto the Colonists, too, but once independence was
secured, ownership of our own given names and/or any Trade Names or Pen Names or
Performer Names vested fully in each one of us, and the only ones who continued
to be part of the "real estate" system were British Territorial Citizens.
assumptions were foisted off onto the Colonists, too, but once independence was
secured, ownership of our own given names and/or any Trade Names or Pen Names or
Performer Names vested fully in each one of us, and the only ones who continued
to be part of the "real estate" system were British Territorial Citizens.
The British claim of custodial
interest in every British Subject regardless of where they live also means that
Brits living in America can't own land, because all interest in land or other
property vests in their Queen, acting as their "Trustee", whether they like it
or not, and everything they own or create is also the Queen's.
interest in every British Subject regardless of where they live also means that
Brits living in America can't own land, because all interest in land or other
property vests in their Queen, acting as their "Trustee", whether they like it
or not, and everything they own or create is also the Queen's.
To make this theft of a man's name,
trademarks, and other property "legal" though it can never be "lawful", the
Queen agrees to protect his property interests from threat offered by anyone
other than herself and her many, many agents and bill collectors. She also
agrees to provide certain social benefits in exchange for his donation of
himself and all his property to serve as collateral backing the Queen's debts.
trademarks, and other property "legal" though it can never be "lawful", the
Queen agrees to protect his property interests from threat offered by anyone
other than herself and her many, many agents and bill collectors. She also
agrees to provide certain social benefits in exchange for his donation of
himself and all his property to serve as collateral backing the Queen's debts.
Sound familiar? It should.
This is how a British Subject's
Surname, like Black or Beecham, is converted first into a Tradename/Trademark
and then "invested" as part of the Real Estate, and the individual name, like
Simon or Mark or Mildred, is interpreted as the name of an individual
"franchise" exercising the Trademark. Additionally, if a Brit accepts any form
of government service, he or she is given a title, typically, "Mister" or "Miss"
or "Missus" or "Doctor" or "Captain" that further identifies them as a servant
or slave or otherwise a debtor of Her Royal Majesty.
Surname, like Black or Beecham, is converted first into a Tradename/Trademark
and then "invested" as part of the Real Estate, and the individual name, like
Simon or Mark or Mildred, is interpreted as the name of an individual
"franchise" exercising the Trademark. Additionally, if a Brit accepts any form
of government service, he or she is given a title, typically, "Mister" or "Miss"
or "Missus" or "Doctor" or "Captain" that further identifies them as a servant
or slave or otherwise a debtor of Her Royal Majesty.
And now you see how incredibly
profitable it has been for the Brits to come over here and pretend,
accidentally-on-purpose, that all these American babies were poor waifs,
"abandoned" on the Civil War Battlefield, of unknown origin, given up by their
purportedly unwed Mothers or turned in like lost baggage by passing strangers
acting as "Informants" ---ripe for their taking and inclusion as part of the
Real Estate, Franchise, and Title System.
profitable it has been for the Brits to come over here and pretend,
accidentally-on-purpose, that all these American babies were poor waifs,
"abandoned" on the Civil War Battlefield, of unknown origin, given up by their
purportedly unwed Mothers or turned in like lost baggage by passing strangers
acting as "Informants" ---ripe for their taking and inclusion as part of the
Real Estate, Franchise, and Title System.
Most Brits were victimized in this
same way and never told a word about it, and they are just as confused by all
the semantic deceit and commercial claims as we have been, but now that all this
Bushwah is delved out and spread squirming on the ground for all to see, it's
apparent that: (1) the Queen has not kept her Coronation Vows to the People of
the Great Britain, but has instead willfully digressed into a very different and
predatory role; and (2) millions upon millions of Americans have been grossly
mischaracterized, deliberately misidentified, and defrauded in Breach of Trust.
same way and never told a word about it, and they are just as confused by all
the semantic deceit and commercial claims as we have been, but now that all this
Bushwah is delved out and spread squirming on the ground for all to see, it's
apparent that: (1) the Queen has not kept her Coronation Vows to the People of
the Great Britain, but has instead willfully digressed into a very different and
predatory role; and (2) millions upon millions of Americans have been grossly
mischaracterized, deliberately misidentified, and defrauded in Breach of Trust.
Most of us aren't Brits and never
were and never want to be --- plus, we already had this argument. Twice. What
force of arms could not deliver, guile cannot provide. Possession by pirates
does not change ownership.
were and never want to be --- plus, we already had this argument. Twice. What
force of arms could not deliver, guile cannot provide. Possession by pirates
does not change ownership.
Now some poor scared and confused
people have come to me, concerned that they might be "fooled again" and
wondering about the use of "Middle Names".
people have come to me, concerned that they might be "fooled again" and
wondering about the use of "Middle Names".
Middle names were not generally used
until the later half of the 19th century, when the Government's administrative
endeavors were becoming bogged down with too many people having the same or very
similar names. The Middle Name convention was adopted to help sort things out
between Robert Joe Black, Robert John Black, Robert Jason Black..... and so on.
until the later half of the 19th century, when the Government's administrative
endeavors were becoming bogged down with too many people having the same or very
similar names. The Middle Name convention was adopted to help sort things out
between Robert Joe Black, Robert John Black, Robert Jason Black..... and so on.
Most United States Presidents, oddly
including "Ulysses S" Grant, didn't have Middle Names or Middle Initials.
Grant's actual name was simply Hiram Grant. He lived his entire career from
Westpoint onward through the war and the Presidency and everything else under an
"assumed name" --- and in his case, a nom de guerre. In Truth, Grant didn't have
a Middle Name, either, simply an "S" that didn't stand for anything more than an
"S".
including "Ulysses S" Grant, didn't have Middle Names or Middle Initials.
Grant's actual name was simply Hiram Grant. He lived his entire career from
Westpoint onward through the war and the Presidency and everything else under an
"assumed name" --- and in his case, a nom de guerre. In Truth, Grant didn't have
a Middle Name, either, simply an "S" that didn't stand for anything more than an
"S".
Perhaps someone relished the joke of
having a President called "US Grant" --- as in, "grant of the United States".
having a President called "US Grant" --- as in, "grant of the United States".
Anyway, old Hiram Grant was the
Golden Boy and the Fall Guy for all that went on during his Administration and
ever since, and having or not having a Middle Name was not the crux of it.
Golden Boy and the Fall Guy for all that went on during his Administration and
ever since, and having or not having a Middle Name was not the crux of it.
The crux (appropriate, the cross) of
it is --- do you own and control your own name and Trademarks as an American, or
do you "voluntarily" adopt the status of a British Territorial "Subject" living
and working in this country as a U.S. Citizen?
it is --- do you own and control your own name and Trademarks as an American, or
do you "voluntarily" adopt the status of a British Territorial "Subject" living
and working in this country as a U.S. Citizen?
Now that you know how the Queen
actually operates this spider web of deceit and false claims and overbearing
ruthless opportunism against her own people, do you want to be part of that?
Never able to own your own home and land, always under the thumb of the Queen
and the Crown? Hounded by British thugs akin to the Raj in India? Helpless to
control your own government?
actually operates this spider web of deceit and false claims and overbearing
ruthless opportunism against her own people, do you want to be part of that?
Never able to own your own home and land, always under the thumb of the Queen
and the Crown? Hounded by British thugs akin to the Raj in India? Helpless to
control your own government?
Think about it, but don't think too
long.
long.
Claim back your Good Name and
standing as a birthright American; correct the falsified record that your
misdirected public employees created "for" you, claiming that you were
"abandoned" property, and latching you as a baby in the name of the British
Monarch --- at the same time these jackals were receiving our aid against the
Nazis and everything from shoelaces to firebricks needed to rebuild their own
country and economy.
standing as a birthright American; correct the falsified record that your
misdirected public employees created "for" you, claiming that you were
"abandoned" property, and latching you as a baby in the name of the British
Monarch --- at the same time these jackals were receiving our aid against the
Nazis and everything from shoelaces to firebricks needed to rebuild their own
country and economy.
The ink wasn't dry on the Nazi
surrender and the gallows hadn't creaked under the feet of the prisoners at
Nuremberg before the Brits were planning our economic and diplomatic defeat.
This is the treachery that Britain and its leadership, in league with the Roman
Pontiff, are famous for, and a "right ruddy example" of the criminality which
has infested the British Islands and the Monarchy ever since the days of "King"
John.
surrender and the gallows hadn't creaked under the feet of the prisoners at
Nuremberg before the Brits were planning our economic and diplomatic defeat.
This is the treachery that Britain and its leadership, in league with the Roman
Pontiff, are famous for, and a "right ruddy example" of the criminality which
has infested the British Islands and the Monarchy ever since the days of "King"
John.
Britain is indeed "Great" but only
because of the greatness of her common people, the toughness, veracity, work
ethic, enterprise and wit of average people living throughout these haunted
Islands---- and that is a greatness that has been heartlessly preyed upon by six
generations of German Supplanters under the control of the House of Wettin.
because of the greatness of her common people, the toughness, veracity, work
ethic, enterprise and wit of average people living throughout these haunted
Islands---- and that is a greatness that has been heartlessly preyed upon by six
generations of German Supplanters under the control of the House of Wettin.
Just as these same Supplanters
substituted their "State of State" organizations for our American State of State
organizations after the Civil War, just as they substituted their version of
"the" United States for The United States, just as they substituted their
version of "the" United States of America and even "the" United States of
America, Incorporated, for our Federation of States, they have done the same
thing every place they have ever taken root and all to the same end--- to act as
deceivers and parasites and then move on, killing their hosts or leaving them
debilitated as they go.
substituted their "State of State" organizations for our American State of State
organizations after the Civil War, just as they substituted their version of
"the" United States for The United States, just as they substituted their
version of "the" United States of America and even "the" United States of
America, Incorporated, for our Federation of States, they have done the same
thing every place they have ever taken root and all to the same end--- to act as
deceivers and parasites and then move on, killing their hosts or leaving them
debilitated as they go.
They set up Germany, they set up
France, they set up Britain -- twice; now they have set up America and pretended
that we are "the US" ---and are trying their best to sink us with their Bunko,
while they move onto China and sink their fangs into a billion Chinese
backs.
France, they set up Britain -- twice; now they have set up America and pretended
that we are "the US" ---and are trying their best to sink us with their Bunko,
while they move onto China and sink their fangs into a billion Chinese
backs.
This all deserves to end, not with
more lies and war planes, but with determined men and women devoted to the cause
of justice and life, finally seeing the Perpetrators of all the misery, all the
lies --- and arresting them as the criminals they are.
more lies and war planes, but with determined men and women devoted to the cause
of justice and life, finally seeing the Perpetrators of all the misery, all the
lies --- and arresting them as the criminals they are.
We need to finally cut to the chase,
see through and beyond all the stooges and storefronts set up to be the Fall
Guys and Scapegoats--- straight through to the ancient evil that these criminals
have cherished. And give them nowhere to hide.
see through and beyond all the stooges and storefronts set up to be the Fall
Guys and Scapegoats--- straight through to the ancient evil that these criminals
have cherished. And give them nowhere to hide.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
