Importance: High Treason The uk Government is led away from our Constitution into forming the basis of a Police State, equal to that of old East Germany. Inducing Panic, Control & unquestioning obedience.
PLEASE READ AND FORWARD THE FOLLOWING EXCELLENT EMAIL
Sent: 20 April 2020 03:48
To: Neil Ferguson Imperial College <email@example.com>
Cc: Nadine Dorries MP Sec of State Health <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Priti Patel MP Private External HO <email@example.com>; Suella Braverman <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Police Commissioner Metropolitan Police Ms Cressida Dick <Comm.PO@met.police.uk>
Subject: Questionable Vaccine Policy
Importance: HIGH TREASON
Dear Professor Neil Ferguson,
You need to be aware that the general public do not believe a word you are saying, and will not tolerate any bully boy Stasi like tactics from the state, in extending the lockdown until a fabled vaccine is produced.
Ask yourself “Cui Bono” (Who benefits?) from all of this disgraceful charade. I keep coming back to the psychopaths in the money men, global business, universities, civil servants, and the modern day I G Farbens.
The attempt, “to imagine removal of Her Majesty as the Supreme Governor of the country akin to death, and rule by terror to gain control of the country will fail, and is treason according to the 1351 Treason Act, and the Bill of Rights 1689.
Treason Act 1351 1351 Chapter 2 25 Edw 3 Stat 5 Statute the Fifth
A person was guilty of high treason under the Act if they:
"compassed or imagined" (i.e. planned) the death of the King, his wife or his eldest son and heir;
violated the King's companion, the King's eldest daughter if she was unmarried or the wife of the King's eldest son and heir;
levied war against the King in his Realm;
adhered to the King's enemies in his Realm, giving them aid and comfort in his Realm or elsewhere;
Bill of Rights 1689:
“And I do declare That no Foreign Prince, Person, Prelate, State or Potentate, hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre-eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical Spiritual within this Realm So Help me God.
That the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons being the two Houses of Parliament should continue to sit and with their Majesties Royal Concurrence make effectual Provision for the Settlement of the Religion Laws and Liberties of this Kingdom so that the same for the future might not be in danger again of being subverted. “
There is a lot of evidence against vaccines, and their harmful effects reported by the British Medical Journal : BMJ 2018; 360 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k15 (Published 05 January 2018)Cite this as: BMJ 2018;360:k15
Official doubletalk hides serious problems with flu shot safety and effectiveness.
If you and your colleagues in the World ‘Health’ Organisation New World Order, under Bill Gates, George Soros and others, think for a minute that the public will meekly accept your satanic evil Machiavellian plan to microchip and poison us all. THINK AGAIN.
World control will always elude people like you and your colleagues, simply because you never obtain the public’s consent for what you plan.
You are all global criminals and a major threat to the people of the world.
You should all be rounded up, taken to the Tower of London, and put on trial for crimes against humanity under the Nuremburg Rules.
See copy of article following my signature.
Mrs J B
The British Journal of Medicine (BMJ) is indeed a reliable and credible source for scientific articles.
This article is from the BMJ…. you can either look it up one here
https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k15/rr or read it below..
Rapid response to:
Reporting flu vaccine science
BMJ 2018; 360 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k15 (Published 05 January 2018)Cite this as: BMJ 2018;360:k15
Official doubletalk hides serious problems with flu shot safety and effectiveness
OFFICIAL DOUBLETALK HIDES SERIOUS PROBLEMS WITH FLU SHOT SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
After weeks of brooding about the Donahue article linking flu shots to miscarriages (Vaccine 2017;35:5314) it was with a sense of relief that I read Rob Wipond’s narrative of media attempts to sweep a serious vaccine safety issue under the rug….He points out the hypocrisy (his words were “double standard”) of authorities who dismissed the Donahue paper because it was an “observational study.” Year after year they have quoted observational studies to announce, “…80% vaccine effectiveness…60% effectiveness…40% effectiveness…” They do not mention that these studies make no effort to look for adverse vaccine effects (e.g. narcolepsy, seizures, high fever, oculorespiratory syndrome). They do not mention “negative vaccine effectiveness”, the increase in risk of illness from influenza and non-influenza viruses associated with (or caused by) the vaccines. (Cowling, Clin Inf Dis 2012;54:1778) They do not mention that a vaccine “effective” in one season may increase influenza risk in a subsequent season. (Read about “antibody-dependent enhancement” to understand one explanatory mechanism). They do not mention that the observational studies they refer to are likely to exaggerate vaccine effectiveness in the first place because of the “healthy user effect” well known to epidemiologists.
Some history: 1960 Nobel Laureate and a primary developer of today’s influenza vaccine, Macfarlane Burnet, didn’t think it was worth much. (Br J Path 1936:17:282. Natural History of Infectious Disease 1972, page212)….In 2000 Kenneth McIntosh warned that we should not routinely give influenza vaccine to healthy children until multicenter randomized trials were done over several seasons to be sure that it was safe and effective. (Editorial, NEJM 2000;342:225) His advice was ignored….In 2004 a “Seven-Step Recipe” for using the media to boost demand for the vaccine was presented to the National Influenza Vaccine Summit, sponsored by the CDC and the AMA. The recipe included, “…statements of alarm by public health authorities…prediction of dire outcomes from influenza…continued reports that influenza is causing severe illness affecting lots of people…repeated urging of influenza vaccination…” (Doshi, BMJ 2005;331:1419) Sound familiar?
Peter Collignon and his colleagues have said this: “We need much larger, independent, and better-reported prospective studies that clearly demonstrate that the benefits of influenza vaccines in children far outweigh harms…If, overall, the increased number of cases of ARI plus vaccine side effects are much larger (in vaccine recipients) than those on placebo, given the low efficacy of the vaccine, then this is a strong argument against current policies advocating routine influenza vaccination of children.” (Collignon, Clin Inf Dis 2015:60:489)
In any discussion of influenza epidemiology we should acknowledge the careful and steady (one could even say fearless) work of Danuta Skowronski and her Canadian public health colleagues. It was they who found that the 2008-9 flu shot doubled the risk of illness from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic flu. Their observations were considered important enough to alter Canadian vaccine recommendations for the 2009-10 season. However, for some reason, they had a good deal of difficulty getting their study finally published. (Skowronski, PLoS Med 2010;7(4):e1000258) This observational study was a revelation, even a shock, to many public health experts. US officials never publicly acknowledged the findings…..This is just one of a number of important papers published over the years by Skowronski and her colleagues, who have a reputation for high scientific and ethical standards.
Wipond does not mention another technique used to dismiss legitimate vaccine safety concerns, having to do with “statistical significance.” Recently, a large cohort study found that flu shots given during the first trimester of pregnancy were associated with a 20% increase in autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. P for the association was 0.01, and the authors acknowledged that, if it was causal, would mean four(4) additional autism cases for every 1000 mothers vaccinated. However, they incorrectly used a statistical manipulation to adjust the finding into “non-significance.” (Hooker, Donzelli, Zerbo. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:600) One typical media headline about the study was, “Flu vaccine during pregnancy not linked to autism.” (Shute, NPR, 11/28/16)….This kind of thing goes on all the time with news releases for vaccine research.
The flu season in North America officially began 5 weeks ago, and the vaccine publicity juggernaut is still picking up steam. Manufacturers are hoping to sell 166 million doses in the US this season. One business group predicts an $8 billion US influenza vaccine market by 2025. (Coherent Market Insights, 1/5/18) The 2016-17 vaccine increased the risk of H3N2 illness among UK elderly by 68%, and officials are calling for better vaccines. (Osterholm, NY Times, 1/8/18) Meanwhile, in the absence of any evidence that it would help, officials and ordinary citizens in the US and UK wrangle about flu shot mandates for healthcare workers.
Wipond’s article provided new insight for an old baby doctor who, at one time, was a wholehearted vaccine advocate, but lately has been exasperated by bullying and doubletalk from vaccine authorities. Let us hope that his article helps to sustain an honest discussion about the safety and effectiveness of influenza vaccines.
Allan S. Cunningham 1/9/18
Competing interests: No competing interests
The flu shots (and some others) have things like
Formaldehyde which is toxic and potentially lethal in high doses. However, they say that it is present in such small amounts in a flu vaccination that it is harmless. This compound is found in household products from glues and other adhesives to pressed-wood furniture. Formaldehyde is a gas that is soluble in water. It’s used in the flu vaccine to inactivate influenza virus. They say that it occurs naturally in the human body, but is it the same, we will never know…. or
Aluminum salts which are adjuvants, which is said it is to help the body to develop a stronger immune response against the virus in the vaccine.
Thimerosal (mercury) is a preservative that keeps the vaccine free from contamination by bacteria and fungi. Without this, the growth of bacteria and fungi is common when a syringe is in a multi-dose vial (a vial that contains more than one dose).. They say that it is different from the standard mercury that can cause illness in large doses, and from the mercury found in seafood (called methylmercury), which can stay in the body for years.
Proteins from chicken eggs help viruses to grow before they go into the vaccine.
Influenza viruses used in vaccines are usually grown inside fertilized chicken eggs, where the virus makes copies of itself. After that, the viruses are separated from the egg and placed in the vaccine; this means that the finished vaccine may contain small amounts of egg proteins, which they say is ok for people/babies with egg allergies, ???
Antibiotics are present in the flu vaccine to keep bacteria from growing during the production and storage of the vaccine..
Sucrose, sorbitol, and monosodium glutamate (MSG) are used to keep vaccines stable. They prevent vaccines from losing potency, even when exposed to heat and light.
Polysorbate 80 keeps all the ingredients evenly distributed. Though large doses can cause some people to have reactions, the amount in the flu vaccine is very small...
As in the article above..
Year after year they have quoted observational studies to announce, “…80% vaccine effectiveness…60% effectiveness…40% effectiveness…” They do not mention that these studies make no effort to look for adverse vaccine effects (e.g. narcolepsy, seizures, high fever, oculorespiratory syndrome .. They do not mention that a vaccine “effective” in one season may increase influenza risk in a subsequent season.
see from the BMJ https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k15/rr The British Journal of Medicine (BMJ) is a reliable and credible source for scientific articles.
Neil Ferguson, is the scientist who convinced PM Boris Johnson of UK coronavirus lockdown, criticised in past for flawed research