March 7, 2019
Fake News US Mainstream Media Falls Into “Sedition Conspiracy” Trap Trump Can Now Use To Jail Them
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A very interesting new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today confirming that the US government has been secretly tracking journalist activities, states that this counterintelligence measure conforms to actions expected if President Trump was preparing to criminally charge his nation’s socialist-led mainstream media establishment using his country’s “Seditious Conspiracy” law that outlaws any conspiracy to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States—which this media establishment, and its socialist Democrat Party co-conspirators, are provably in violation of as they enter into their third consecutive year of open warfare against Trump in order to fuel the drumbeat of civil war that has now become audible across the entirety of America. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, in order to protect itself against an internal rebellion threatening to overthrow its government, the United States has in current legal force numerous federal laws contained in 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115—Treason, Sedition, And Subversive Activities—the main one being 18 U.S. Code Section 2384 Seditious Conspiracy that outlaws 2 or more persons from attempting to overthrow the government.
Under the provisions outlined in this “Seditious Conspiracy” law, this report says it’s important to note, the legal definition of the word “conspiracy” mandates it must be an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal—and was a legal standard met just hours ago when the Democrat Party shockingly announced it had barred Fox News from hosting any of its 2020 presidential candidate debates—a vile act President Trump rapidly responded to by Tweeting: “Democrats just blocked @FoxNews from holding a debate. Good, then I think I’ll do the same thing with the Fake News Networks and the Radical Left Democrats in the General Election debates!”.
To the Democrat Party having any legal and/or valid reason to ban Fox News from hosting any of their debates, this report details, none exist—as evidenced during the 2016 US presidential election debate season that saw NBC News financial network CNBC host John Harwood colluding with Hillary Clinton as to what questions he should ask her—and CNN host Donna Brazile having to admit she secretly provided Hillary Clinton with debate questions—while at the same time, it was actually Fox News host Megyn Kelly who hammered Trump on the presidential debate stage.
Having no valid reason, therefore, for banning Fox News from hosting debates, this report continues, Democrat Party chairman Tom Perez stated this decision was based solely on a new article appearing in the 11 March 2019 issue of The New Yorker Magazine titled “The Making of the Fox News White House”—that in its essence is a politically motivated screed based on socialist fantasies, made up sources, and despicable innuendo—in other words, “fake news”.
The grave danger, though, to the Democrat Party openly acknowledging that it had based its adverse action against Fox News because of what was written in a “fake news” mainstream media “hit job” article, this report notes, is because it exactly mirrors the actions taken by the Democrat Party and US mainstream media to publish the Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Trump-Russia Dossier “hit job” article that led to the appointment of a Special Counsel against President Trump—and that combined, now proves a conspiracy involving the US mainstream media publishing “fake news” articles to be acted upon by the Democrat Party in the furtherance of overthrowing the United States government.
Not being remembered to their peril by the Democrat Party and their socialist mainstream media lapdogs, this report concludes, was President Trump having taken his oath of office while his hand placed on the same Bible used by the first Republican Party President Abraham Lincoln when he took power in 1861—whom, exactly like Trump, was reviled and hated by the Democrat Party and mainstream media who launched a full-fledged civil war against him—but whom, also, provided Trump the map on how to deal with these seditious conspirators, imprison them all—and as best exampled in one of Lincoln’s own orders that said:
Whereas there has been wickedly and traitorously printed and published this morning in the New York World and New York Journal of Commerce, newspapers printed and published in the city of New York, a false and spurious proclamation purporting to be signed by the President and to be countersigned by the Secretary of State, which publication is of a treasonable nature, designed to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States and to the rebels now at war against the Government and their aiders and abettors, you are therefore hereby commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command the editors, proprietors, and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers, and all such persons as, after public notice has been given of the falsehood of said publication, print and publish the same with intent to give aid and comfort to the enemy; and you will hold the persons so arrested in close custody until they can be brought to trial before a military commission for their offense.
You will also take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce, and hold the same until further orders, and prohibit any further publication therefrom.
“The time is not unlikely to come when I shall be blamed for having made too few arrests rather than too many.”
16th President of the United States Abraham Lincoln
March 7, 2019 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.