(Thanks, C. :)

Reader C. responds:

=====

Thank you for posting the “ Please review the below submission carefully and distribute via your web presence as a PUBLIC SERVICE."

I was surprised and gratified by readers responses. So I respond. Post as you wish or send to other readers commenting.

1. Please review the history of Masonry and the subject status of the individual Masons over the centuries. I believe you will find what I did. All the so-called historical documents used to validate so many positions were written by subjects, for the control of other subjects at the insistence or suffrage of the Master, King or Ruler. The change of course going into effect 1776 as recognized by King George in 1783. This recognition of a Sovereign, George, of other Sovereigns, the People allowed the Treaty. Simple logic exposes that the master or King cannot and never Treats with his own property. George’s property of course being Masons as well as others at the time. So, the question is, did George ever release his control over the Masonic order he allowed his then subjects to operate. Then, if the Order was not released from chattel property condition, how are the individual masons not still subject to the English Crown?

2. The information verifications and public documents are on the web. RMN and other committed web sites search bars provide a wealth of information. Almost every point raised is easily found by simply typing the subject matter into the search bars. Be ready to be overwhelmed with the volume of information.

3. Perhaps a simple understanding of jurisdiction will clear up the confusions surrounding the misconstructions of identifying the “Crown”. The English Crown is a position granted by the Holy See to gods agent over a particular area. This is an ecclesiastical jurisdiction. City of London was franchised and created under Roman Empire Rule. The franchise has been recognized by various “ jurisdiction” since the beginning of “Londinum”. Check the British Web youtube for verification of the latest recognition and some of the history. Then please inform all of us other readers how the City Of London obtained the Title of Crown. I cannot find where the Title Crown was ever assigned the the City nor who assigned it. The Crown Temple as pointed out is a Templar construct. Please recall the Templars at the time the Temple was constructed were Holy See franchise in the same manner as the then English King. Jurisdiction takes many forms, venue is constant.

4. I have followed this position for years and could never understand how secret agreements rule or control Public Record Documents accepted world wide as true and accurate. The confusion I believe lay in the misconstruction of public and private capacities.

I live under the public record documents beginning with the 1776 Declaration, the Confederation, NW Ordinance, States Constitutions. These are public law created by the People. Public jurisdiction is easily identifiable by public records.

I live in the public jurisdiction created by the People, not some secret jurisdiction .

No American could ever have a private contract or relationship with government because the People creating governments did not grant their constructions to power to legislate over the Grantors , the People.

Any one claiming a private settlement or relationship with government is admitting the are involved in something secret. Proof positive of DIVIDED LOYALTIES.

The federal Constitution is a trust created for the posterity by the direct agents to the People through the foundational documents cited above. Read them as contracts identifying the parties and positions and clarity will emerge.

The States are clearly identified as the constructors of the 1787 Constitution at Article 7. The States are the Peoples property because we created them.

The private, secret, hidden documents theses characters say establish ownership over the Peoples governments are just that PRIVATE between those parties and those who currently operate in the same secrecy. In every jurisdiction I have ever encountered secret agreements do not apply to any one not part of the secret.
In order for the “ secret “ squirrel world to control the public forum an agent in the public would be needed to operate secretly deceiving his public employer. Go figure.

The mix up between jurisdictions in or at law, maritime operations, treaty operations, public record, causing lack of clarity leading the mix in of commerce is exposed by this whole position that we the U.S. are British owned is defeated by one question.

“Under what law, theory of lay, custom, policy, practice or jurisdiction did King George’s release of all real, chattel, political properties not cover All if his subjects and franchised operations, nunc pro tunc, the moment the 1783 release became public international law?”

How do later actions control or circumvent the 1783 act?
The mixup resides in the land of slavery in ones own mind, the believing some other mans, or group of men’s, secret stuff controls you.

The original article causing this thread could lead those with the ability to discern for them selves where their access to liberty lay!

Further point; In commerce there are only three positions. Creditor, debtor and transfer agent. The transfer agent is always neutral. Thus, money transferring value is neutral.
Those making deposits or producing products are the Creditors. The other position of debtor are those accepting the deposit of value. Until fair exchange is established these are the only two positions operational.

The purveyors of the position that the U.S. is a British property miss a key essential point.

Any ones SS number identifies account of an individual American. Ask the SSA for an accounting of deposits and they will send you a deposit record.

So, if we the People created government under our authority and power, depositors of our individual property, political will, are we the creditor to the governments debtor position?

If one American has the SS deposit registry identifying the deposits into the account held at the Treasury, is that American a depositor?

Creditors can never be held to secret agreements or others commercial obligations because that is SLAVERY. This applies particularly to DEBTORS attacking Creditors.

So, guys, please explain to me again how I am a British Property and the government, my government, created by we the People is owned by a foreign power!!

************************************************************************