HEADS UP: There will be massive CIA infiltration of churches because of this, every church will have several trolls trying to destroy the preacher.
So if you do go back to church and you see this start happening, you are going to have to call the trolls out as being CIA and hammer one thing home: IF YOU HATE WHAT THE PREACHER SAID, GO ELSEWHERE, WE DO NOT WANT YOU HERE.

Additionally, preachers are going to have to root in and stand their ground, because the CIA and Jewish community will definitely activate and do everything possible to get within every last preacher's circle of influence, and destroy them right from the top. They already do this, but after this latest executive order it will explode to become a heated effort to destroy. They will approach the preachers as "great Christian allies", never mention they are Jewish or CIA, attempt to become huge assets, provide huge financial support to the church if needed, and then leverage that to gain control and destroy. By making themselves an "indispensible part of the organization" they will ultimately gain the control they need to destroy the organizations. Preachers are going to have to be extra vigilant to avoid this.

At any rate, yesterday the Jews were flipped out about this new executive order, and are already preparing lawsuits. Jews have always been immune to IRS intrusions over organizing and encouraging political actions in their synagogues, and they don't want the same rights handed to Christian churches. So they will try to do everything they can to crush this executive order and maintain their quiet, under the surface monopoly on activism from places of worship. Their actions are probably going to get ugly over this.

http://82.221.129.208/baaasepager5.html

: President Trump’s signing of an executive order removing the
: threat of the loss of tax-exempt status from churches in
: the United States if they address or express a position on
: political issues or candidates removes an intrusion into
: religious freedom that has no place in this nation, an

: unconstitutional restriction on what can be said from the
: pulpit.

: It’s a restriction that applies primarily to Christian
: churches in its enforcement, particularly over the last
: eight years when Christians were targeted by the
: Islamic-favoring and empowering Obama regime. Imams weren’t
: threatened by the IRS but we know from the incident
: surrounding the targeting of conservatives for their views
: by Lois Lerner and her many accomplices that the same can’t
: be said for preachers, pastors, priests and probably
: rabbis.

: President Trump stated in his remarks associated with the
: signing of the executive order prohibiting persecution
: under the Johnson Amendment. He said, “No American should
: be forced to choose between the dictates of the federal
: government and the tenets of their faith. As I campaigned
: across the country, faith leaders explained that they were
: prevented from speaking their minds because of a 1954 rule
: known as the Johnson Amendment.”

: He pointed out that he spoke of it often during the campaign
: and had pledged to fix the problem if elected. He noted,
: “Under this rule, if a pastor, priest or imam speaks about
: issues of public or political importance, they are
: threatened with the loss of their tax-exempt status, a
: crippling financial punishment; very, very unfair. But no
: longer.”

: “And to this end,” says President Trump, “this financial
: threat against the faith community is over. In America we
: do not fear people speaking freely [unless you’re Mark
: Zuckerberg] from the pulpit, we embrace it. America has a
: rich tradition of social change beginning in our pews and
: our pulpits. Perhaps there is no greater example than the
: historic role of the African-American church as the agent
: for social progress, spurring our nation to greater justice
: and equality.”

: Of Course the terrorist sympathizers at CAIR and other
: caliphate promoting organizations and mosques are surely
: already at work determining in what ways they’ll be able to
: manipulate this into an advantage in their takeover. That’s
: to be expected. With no penalties for violations being
: levied against them and a lack of respect for the law of
: the infidels to begin with, they were likely already fully
: engaged in political activism from their pulpits
: irrespective of the law. The rules of engagement have
: merely been relaxed to allow law-abiding Christians to
: compete on more equal terms.

: Trump declared, “We must never infringe on the noble tradition
: of change from the church and progress from the pew.” It
: wouldn’t be a bad idea to never infringe upon the
: Constitution also, the Bill of Rights in particular. Fixing
: that ongoing injustice would take a lot of executive
: orders, speeches and signing ceremonies.

:

: Rick Wells