Reader responds:

***************

While not having the energy at present to give my concurring opinion on the Jew aspect of this post, I wanted to post this comment.

Please stay aware as you view ANY pictures online or in any media presentation. What may "look like" a heterosexual couple likely may not be -- it may be a trans this or that which looks remarkably "normal" in the old school normal.

This subtle "re-do" on what we expect is designed to have us, the public, subliminally "accept" the trans this and that -- to break down our "normal" expectations.

I have noticed A LOT of visuals that present overtly two males OR two females. At least those presentations are "up front", though are also subliminally communicating. If children are shown, it is with one parent figure, not two. ...sigh...

I have also noticed that if ever a visual presents "a couple", it is likely that "the couple" is not a male and a female, but is a trans couple. Hard to analyze from the way the visual may be edited and all the costuming and physical re-doings, but look closely and you may notice some traits that do not fit, such as head size to shoulder width at a 1:3 ratio [male], instead of 1:2 ratio [female]. Or ring finger longer than index finger -- not a 100% rule but more likely in males than females. Also, broad cheek bones, a "stronger-looking" face -- this trait is hard to describe in a few words, but some of the videos on topic have mentioned and shown this.

The angle taken in the present "public relations campaign" on this topic, IMO, is to lure men away from attraction to women. To set them up to be attracted to men.

A Reader