Note that this is from a UK site, so the "we" in the subtitle presumably refers to non-US-citizens, to which certain provision of the order apparently apply.) Also the order may not actually an Executive Order but rather a "Presidential Memorandum". Executive Orders are numbered. Trump's recent "orders" aren't.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Has President Trump’s executive order on 'Public Safety' killed off Privacy Shield?
We are all 'Removable Aliens' now
30 Jan 2017 - Amberhawk Training
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/30/trump_executive_order_public_safety_privacy_shield/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~ EXCERPT ~~~~~
Section 14 of the Executive Order states that “Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information”.

Note that this exclusion relates to data subjects of all visitors and foreign nationals lawfully working in the USA irrespective of nationality.

In addition, there will be increased data sharing of personal data about EU data subjects (permitted by the Privacy Act as we shall see). For instance, Section 4 of the Order “direct agencies to employ all lawful means to ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States against all removable aliens” (my emphasis).

One such “lawful means” includes maximising lawful sharing of personal data between Federal Agencies as legitimised by the USA’s Privacy Act.

Section 2(b) of the Order reinforces this increased data sharing impetus as Federal Agencies should “Make use of all available systems and resources to ensure the efficient and faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States”. Systems and resources obviously include the immense personal datasets now held by Federal Agencies.

The definition of “removable alien” also increases to range of data sharing; a removable alien includes non-USA citizens:

who engage in “willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter” (i.e. even if unconnected with immigration);

who “have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits”; or

who “in the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety”.

Finally, the Order states that is “the policy of the executive branch to empower State and local law enforcement agencies across the country to perform the functions of an immigration officer in the interior of the United States to the maximum extent permitted by law”.

The point being made is that it seems quite easy for any non-USA national to qualify for the status of “potential removable alien”, especially if a large number of officials can investigate any individual if they judge that person to be “a risk to public safety” (whatever that means).

It is these low thresholds that can trigger data sharing which will focus attention to the actual protection afforded by the Privacy Act itself. Additionally, if these protections do not exist (as they do in some disclosure circumstances), then access to them by the Judicial Redress Act is rendered irrelevant.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~