And they are very much already a part of the current system, much to the chagrin of the black hats.
: The Sunday Talk Shows are filled with various left-wing
: punditry using two media reports from the Washington Post
: and New York Times claiming anonymous, albeit transparently
: political, “intelligence officials” who state: the Russian
: government “hacked the U.S. election“.
: First, the media’s choice of wording is critical within both
: reports.
: It is impossible to “hack an election“. What was hacked was
: the DNC email system, and John Podesta’s email. WikiLeaks
: published the content of both “hacks”.
: Additionally, WikiLeaks has denied the source of the
: information was a foreign government.
: Both The Washington Post and New York Times, simultaneously,
: published articles on Friday claiming anonymous sources
: within the CIA (note: intensely political CIA Chief John
: Brennan in charge) point to the Russian government as the
: originators of the hacking. However, both articles are
: written with very obtuse and non specific language intended
: to cover over the fact these reports are not actually
: stating the official intelligence community are making
: these specific claims.
: All other media outlets subsequently take this illogically
: based presentation and spin their coverage whereby the “DNC
: hacked” becomes “the election hacked“.
: In essence, the MSM takes a politically manipulated original
: intelligence claim and pushes a political media angle
: within a manufactured story of their own creation.
: When the media reports on their own media reports the
: concentric circle of a self fulfilling narrative expands
: toward the infinite horizon of nothingness.
: Various Trump administration officials are then commanded to
: show up for interviews where they are asked to respond to
: the content of media reports which are based entirely on
: other manipulated media reports….. And that’s where we are
: today.
: However, if anyone could actually pause and call out this
: nonsense they might find it useful to reference the already
: well known politicization of the entire intelligence
: community apparatus. The politicization was/is so severe it
: led to an inspector general investigation: More than 50
: intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s
: Central Command have formally complained that their reports
: on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being
: inappropriately altered by senior officials.
: The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to
: open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of
: intelligence. The fact that so many people complained
: suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how
: the U.S. military command charged with the war against the
: self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.
: “The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence
: command,” one defense official said. (link)
: If, and that’s a big IF, there is any substantive truthfulness
: behind the politicized CIA accusation obtusely outlined
: within the Washington Post report, there is every reason to
: believe the anonymous sources are the same manipulative
: “senior intelligence command” already under inspector
: general investigation.
: It is transparent to everyone the net intention of this
: ‘hacked election narrative’ is to provide the professional
: political UniParty class in Washington DC with a fortified
: defense mechanism to thwart off the incoming swamp
: draining.
: The use of corporate media to protect the corporate
: legislative body is as familiar, and predictable, as
: Senators John McCain (see: Keating Five), and Lindsey
: Graham, fighting against term limits and finance reform on
: behalf of their corporate interests/benefactors, Wall
: Street and global interests.
: However, moving forward there is considerable room for
: previously outlined optimism. The corruption within the
: intelligence community officials appears so severe, the
: White Hats are rising up from within the Defense Department
: to tackle it head-on.
: With General Mattis as Secretary of Defense, Michael Flynn as
: National Security Advisor, General John Kelly as Secretary
: of Homeland Security, a top-of-class West Point graduate in
: Mike Pompeo brought in to take over and undoubtedly purge
: the CIA, and a lame duck struggle breaking out over the NSA
: with Admiral Mike Rogers, the implications are pretty
: obvious.
: The white hats we have needed within the national security and
: intelligence departments are responding from a select group
: within the Defense Department. This DoD surge appears to be
: why corporate interests are railing against “too many
: generals”. The DoD generals also appears to be why all of
: those interests -within all of those corrupted political
: intel institutions- are going nuts thinking about what lays
: ahead.
: Mounting evidence supports the ongoing thesis the Department
: of Defense has actually seceded from the political elites.
: A wonderfully patriotic soft coup has taken place; and with
: the election of President Donald Trump, the white hats are
: poised on the horizon to reconstruct a nationalist-minded
: defense, security and intelligence apparatus.
: This is the fundamental paradigm shift many have quietly
: discussed, yet few imagined possible. Elevate your
: thinking… I mean REALLY elevate. Now, Look closely: They
: have much more in common than people are currently
: grasping…. Think about it.
:
: http://www.blacklistednews.com/The_New_York_Times_and_Washington_Post_%E2%80%9CIntelligence_Sources%E2%80%9D_Under_Inspector_General_Investigation%E2%80%A6/55737/0/38/38/Y/M.html