I am certainly no fan of Obamacare. Even Bill Clinton is bad mouthing it now, for reasons which are obscure.

Here is a PDF link for the "Affordable Care" bill in all its steaming organic fertilizer glory:
http://housedocs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

Now, as to the claims in that thing that looks an image capture of an email which circulated years ago, I checked the most alarming claim, about not treating patients for cancer after age 76. I looked at Section 1145 on page 272, which seems to be the reference they are claiming for that. Section 1145 says absolutely nothing about that. It has to do with possible adjustments of payments to cancer hospitals, for differences in costs. See the text copied below.

As to some of the other claims in that piece, some of them may be more or less true, I haven't checked them yet. Readers are welcome to do so using the PDF above.

From pages 272-273:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SEC. 1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS.
Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395l(t)) is amended by adding at the end the following

new paragraph:
"(18) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CANCER HOSPITALS.—
"(A) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct
a study to determine if, under the system under
this subsection, costs incurred by hospitals de-
scribed in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) with respect
to ambulatory payment classification groups ex-
ceed those costs incurred by other hospitals fur-
nishing services under this subsection (as deter-
mined appropriate by the Secretary).
"(B) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT.—
Insofar as the Secretary determines under sub-
paragraph (A) that costs incurred by hospitals
described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) exceed
those costs incurred by other hospitals fur-
nishing services under this subsection, the Sec-
retary shall provide for an appropriate adjust-
ment under paragraph (2)(E) to reflect those
higher costs effective for services furnished on
or after January 1, 2011.".

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~