No, it did not originate from me because I have never written ZAP, Jerzy or anybody at Landa China Global and no immediate plans to do so. I responded to ZAP's accusatory statement, which readers can read in my original response to ZAP in this thread. No reason to quote or respond to statements I did not make?

Someone is purposely trying to "muddy the waters." It needs to stop because the truth cannot be hidden and in the end it comes out anyway.

DG
--------------------------------------------------------------

: Hi, igots2no -

: It might have been clearer if you'd included what Zap was
: referring to in his writing that you quoted. He seems to
: believe the following was from you:

_HEY ZAP...TIME
: YOU ACTUALLY PROVE THAT THE "ROYALS" AND THE _
: _CHINESE ARE EVEN INVOLVED. YOU CONSTANTLY TAKE LIBERTIES _

: _IN MENTIONING THOSE TWO ENTITIES, BUT AS ALWAYS WE HAVE
: NO_ _TANGIBLE PROOF THEY HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
: IT’S JUST_ _MORE OF YOUR "FEEL GOOD" VERBIAGE
: WHICH STILL STOKES THE_ _LITTLE REMAINING ENERGY IN THOSE
: WHO SUBSCRIBED TO THIS_ _YEARS AND YEARS AGO. YOU ALSO
: CLAIM TO KNOW LITTLE OR_ _NOTHING ABOUT THE PP, BUT DO
: RESPOND TO CRAYFORD AS IF_ _YOU ARE IN THE KNOW. THE WHOLE
: DEAL COMES ACROSS AS_ _AN EXTREMELY COMPLICATED MESS AND AS
: USUAL NO_ _MONIES EVER ARE DISTRIBUTED. "SHOW US THE
: MONEY" SHOULD_ _BE THE PHRASE FOR ALL OF THIS. WORDS,
: WORDS AND MORE_ _WORDS FOR WELL OVER 20 YEARS. WORDS...NO
: ACTIONS. KEEP_ _GIVING PEOPLE HOPE AS MOST NEED IT SINCE
: THAT’S ALL THEY_ _HAVE LEFT. TALK IS CHEAP.
: PATHETIC._

That's in Sunday's Poofness newsletter:
: POOFness for May 8: Mama Liked the Roses
: hobie -- Sunday, 8-May-2016 22:00:56

: That's where his "prove the royals" comment stems
: from. If that was _not_ from you, saying so would make
: matters clearer.

: --hobie

:
: ****************************************************************************