Your first statement is untrue!

As you state, you were the one who brought up "graphene" and I asked to enlighten us about the miraculous quality of it, which you never did and now you are blaming the readers why it is ignored?
Helloooooooo!
Anybody home??

Why are you parroting another propaganda line but unable to come "clean". Meaning.....present a working Keshe device without any kind of trickery or somebody far away who knew somebody else who had a relative, blah, blah, blah!

You and nobody else can provide a properly working as described unit but there is plenty of talk about it. I wanted to state babble.

Mark my word or "read my lips".
Nothing "revolutionary" will happen on Thursday!
Keshe is dangling the carrot in front of you. Sucking your energy of hope, which was also the last demon in Pandora's box, if you remember.

Most likely, he'll make a "side step" but there won't be a "clean", observable by anybody device as it was described, which will be displayed and operating.

If and that is a big if, there will be something, it will not be clearly observable and it will be a stationary display. The cameras will be cutting in and out.

Remember! Keshe also failed to disable the aircraft carriers of the leading nations.

Just out of curiosity.
How does the device make a car more efficient by plugging it into a cigarette lighter?

The power that powers a car is an internal combustion engine. The drain on the alternator is not higher than 200-300W during the day without AC, which is less than one half horse power.

What is the connection between the internal combustion engine and the MAGRAV, which is connected to the vehicle's electrical system???
What am I missing???

: Re: Reader Oliver comments & Mr.Ed replies

: Nobody seems to want to address the graphene or it's
: properties, despite the fact that I have brought it up a
: number of times inn regard to the Keshe technology.

: Why is that?

: Does it hit too close to something that certain folks do not
: want revealed?

: And speaking of cars that get 30-60% better fuel efficiency, I
: grew up to a fellow that was upper level management for
: Ford. He put in for one of their R&D cars and received a
: Mustang. Keep in mind that this was back in the early 70's.
: That car was getting 60+mpg. He questioned R&D and they
: informed him they must have forgotten to pull some of the
: experimental equipment. He returned it to them and, when he
: got it back, the mileage w back to what would be expected.
: I do not believe for a second that they have not vastly
: improved upon what they understood more than 40 years ago.

: I wonder if anybody out there would go for a Ford Mustang that
: got 60+mpg, or maybe even much better, these days???

: Only ones I can think of that would not would be the owners
: bigwigs at the top of the petrochemical industry.

: Anon