Re: Dutchsinse + ‘True Universal Time’ — Equation outline
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=25061

“All the very BEST, Dutchsinse with your exciting True Universal Time equation, and all it entails!! Lymerick”...

------------------

From CGI's Morfeus. CGI is Rumor Mill News readers Forum where Morfeus is a member.

Lymerick,

Is that article actually a parody or satire or something similar?

Do you actually understand what Dutchsinse claimed in that article? Do you specifically understand the meanings (or lack of them) of the following statements from that article?

"Time as a force, not as you imagine it on a wall clock.
The actual physical force of “time” is what I am calling “True Universal Time” being the “time” in which Mass and Space operate."

"“True Universal Time” consists of other physical elements and is fully based upon the laws of physics."

"Time is a physical byproduct of energy and distance through space"

"What is this “time”, and what is it made of? How is it formed from Energy + Space?"

"In an equation, it would appear simply at T = ED squared or T=ed2

"If we want to know the “real” time of the Universe, we can apply T=ED in reverse to determine (T)

DE=T … Distance X Energy = “Time” …

ET=D ….. Energy X “Time” = Distance

TD = E … Time X Distance = Energy"

We can see the obvious contradictions in these statement and formulas?

In this article Dutchsinse demonstrates that he does not know mathematics, nor physics, but still he is trying to “reveal a great discovery” which requires the knowledge of mathematics and physics.

He is even boasting like a greedy gold digger who just found his treasure:

“But for now, I’ve got to get it out there in case something happens to me (by accident or otherwise).

This is my theory which I claim today publicly, not to be ripped by someone else."

Hahaha… come on people, this is getting very ridiculous!

Do I really need to debunk the above Dutchsinse statements? I don’t think so, because it is so trivially obvious that they are either BS, or mathematically contradict each other. But if people want me to do so I will do that. If he is a journalist why doesn’t he sticks with stuff that he does well, why is he dabbling in a field he is ignorant about. Why not let the cobbler stick to his last?

I am not criticizing the other writings of Dutchsinse here, only and exclusively this recommended article. I could even imagine that this article was not written by him, but by some disinfo agent who posted it on the site of Dutchsinse to discredit him.

Whatever the case, this is wrong! Plane wrong!

Morpheus