(Thanks, H. :)

Reader H. writes:

=====

Greetings, having watched the twitter video in the above post I have difficulty reconciling the difference between the post title and the message being conveyed by the young lady.

Her concerns center on the stealth introduction of her digital ID Driver's Licence in Australia using the excuse that she has been the victim of a data hack of her personal information.

Her comments suggest to me that she has been a vocal opponent of mandated jabbing, lockdowns etc, which in turn suggests that she may have been deliberately chosen as a forced early adopter of the total surveillance and control solutions desired by world government wannabees.

This video does not look like a whiny unemployed actress trying to be noticed, but instead looks like the revelation of some more nefarious activities of Australian Federal or State Authorities.

I would be interested to know why Brendon O'Connell framed his twitter comments in the way he did given the apparent gravity of her message about the manner of the forced introduction of digital ID's in Australia.

Am I the only one who sees it this way?

*************************************************************