More infos and thoughts on the sinking of Russia's flagship MOSKVA in the Black Sea:

Still, most of all contributions are based on speculations, as neither NATO, nor Russia are telling us what really happened with the cruiser Moskva. NATO, because they know – and Moscow, because they still seem to get clear themselves what brought down their flagship.

So they try buying time for being 100% sure.

Why? If they can prove NATO complicity in this stunt without any doubt they have to decide very thoroughly how to answer, probably without letting lose all dogs from hell.

As far as Ukraine is concerned, I don’t believe anything coming out of the Kiev regime’s mouth. The Neptune/Bayraktar fairytale is hard to believe, anyhow. Th Russian fleet had established a multidimensional surveillance/defense layer direction Odessa.

Another fact, I wonder nobody came up with yet – is the location of the Moskva:

clearly, near one of those 3 drilling-rigs, used for monitoring the whole sector with hydrophones and NEVA-BS radar, precisely the most westward one – BK-2 Odessa, appr. 66 km northeast from Snake Island. Integrated in the monitoring systems of the whole region! (CJSC Morskie Kompleksy i Sistemy, St.Petersburg) – Ships as well as low flying targets, even smaller echoes, like the head of a swimming person at 1km!

https://www.unian.info/politics/10594875-kremlin-uses-for-e-warfare-drilling-rigs-seized-in-black-sea-osint-group.html

Complete, with all other warships in the region, watching mainly towards north (Odessa), there is a little chance that anything – not to speak of subsonic Neptunes or any Bayraktar drones could have slipped through this airial net.

So what could have happened? And, again – this is only speculation – but a solid one.

It could have been some kind of underwater drone, released either from some sneaky sub, or by a SBS team, coming from the WESTERN coast, with a stopover at Snake Island. From there 50kms are within the range of such special forces. That drone that somehow manages to drill itself through the hull from below and explodes its payload from inside. Kursk, anyone?

The other possibility could be an internal saboteur, anyway.

Most probably the Moskwa was there to monitor and halt hostile activities over/from Romania. Strategically the loss of the flagship with excellent air cover capabilities might not be such a problem right now, as it is PR-wise. Anyhow, if the NATO decides to participate openly in this conflict, the Moskwa could have been a problem at that very location.

We’ll see what will be Russia’s response, if at all. As for now both sides know what might be at stake and keep themselves covered. Let’s pray that the common sense prevails and Russia’s answer will be appropriate to show the world they are nobody’s fool, likewise not being interested in senseless provocations.

FS3
Z4Q

===

Telegram: @FarSight3
t.me/FS3_Talk

Website (mostly in German, no problem with translation tools): https://farsight3.wordpress.com/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/FarSight3