(Thanks, M. :)

M, Anna's point is that land and soil jurisdictions are outside the purview of the US Supreme Court. I'm not sure why that's so, but I'd feel sure Anna's way of seeing it is persuasive. Perhaps it's because Treaties are made between sovereigns. I don't know.

Responding to:

Anna Von Reitz: "Judicial Notice to the U.S. Supreme Court Witnessed by All High Courts"
hobie -- Monday, 1-Nov-2021 03:10:26

...Reader M. writes and sends us:

=====

Through treaty-making, the United States brought its legal system to bear on Indigenous peoples, and then broke its own laws. They set the rules of the game, then cheated. Treaty scholars often mention the “supremacy clause,” Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution, which states, “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding” (emphasis added).

Legally, then, TREATIES ARE ABSOLUTELY ON A PAR WITH THE CONSTITUTION.

"Chief LaVern Fast Horse is NOT presenting the interests of a Dependent

Sovereignty which lost the various Indian Wars, as Anna Von Reitz states.

Chief LaVern Fast Horse is presenting the interests of an OCCUPIED Sovereignty which signed treaties in good faith which were NEVER honored.

Suppose we made a purchase agreement with you for your home, agreeing to pay a specific price for it, but then we moved into your home and NEVER paid you for it. Would we have any legal right to live in your house? What would you call what we had done? And if we willed the house to our children and they to theirs, even though our grandchildren weren’t the ones who stole the house, would they have a right to live there?

The Native American Prophecy of Chinese invading America to help the Native Americans will now become manifest as a result of the continued threats of violence and intent to act in bad faith by Settler Colonial offspring.

References:

Martin Case, The Relentless Business of Treaties: How Indigenous Land Became U.S. Property (St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press, 2018), 4–6.

*************************************************************