(Thanks, L. :)

Reader Lance writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'About 'Q''

With all regards to Anna Von Reitz...she missed the point about Q.
Reintroducing the basis of Western learning, and hence our ability to communicate on this device (whatever device you are using) was no small feat. If we look at the basis of Western learning we see an interplay of zetetic (adj.)
"proceeding by inquiry," 1640s, from Modern Latin zeteticus, from Greek zetetikos "searching, inquiring," from zetetos, verbal adjective of zetein "seek for, inquire into." Related: Zetetical.

And

maieutic (adj.)
"pertaining to the Socratic method of assisting a person, by questions, to discover conceptions latent in his mind," 1650s, from Greek maieutikos, a figurative use in philosophy of a word meaning literally "obstetric," from maieuesthai "act as a midwife," from maia "midwife"

Those two systems combined cracked a code in 10's of millions that they can not 'unsee', 'unlearn'. They can never go back to not questioning. Misses Von Reitz (hmmm...Von's scare me, presumed royalty). Thinking the Qdrops were about 'secret codes' or some such thing, is puerile thinking. The whole point is/was about formulating thinking processes with vast amounts of people who demand 'sauce' for your own speculations which makes you dig deeper in order to formulate your hypothesis better.

What is wrong with that? Adding to a Global HUMINT project...seems okay to me. The difference between reading random posts here, or on GLP or 4/8 etc and actually creating a body of work not based on timing (the timing people get all screwed up all the time), but on learning together in a way that was almost lost in the West scares the PTw.

Anyhow
Regards and God Bless
Lance
WWG1WGA

***************************************************************************