: =====

: You're Under House Arrest as a Result of a Crime
: Committed by the CDC Last week, we saw a
: video featuring Dr Rashid Buttar, in which he reminded us
: that after a US Federal Case resulted in a moratorium on
: the weaponization of SARS coronaviruses in the US and in
: order to protect the CDC's patent on SARS, Anthony Fauci
: oversaw a $3.7 million grant given to the Wuhan Institute
: of Virology for it to illegally develop the very same novel
: coronavirus that has since culminated in his forceful and

: repeated recommendations to shut down the global economy.
: Dr Buttar also reminded us that Fauci, through the
: NIAID owns a 50% share in the patent on a protein made from
: HIV that helps to more efficiently deliver vaccine material
: throughout the body. This patent is being used by some of
: the companies now developing vaccines for the coronavirus.
: Therefore, NIAID, through Fauci has both financed the
: development of the virus behind the plandemic, and it will
: collect half the royalties on its eventual vaccine!
: If this isn't racketeering of the most headspinning and
: depraved sort, I don't know what is! When a friend called
: me up last week to say he and some friends might put
: together a RICO case, I wasn't surprised. It's time
: to get legal on their ass - and inventor, author, financier
: and futurist, Dr David E Martin has done just that by
: submitting a Request for an Investigation into a
: possible Anti-Trust Violation to the Office of the
: Inspector General for the United States Department of
: Health and Human Services on April 22, 2020 and he has
: drafted a potential Anti-Trust case against HHS, CDC,
: NIAID, etc., of which this video is an Exhibit:
: Citizens of the United States of America v.
: United States Department of Health and Human Services
: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Robert R
: Redfield, et al. National Institute of Allergy and
: Infectious Diseases Anthony Stephen Fauci, et al.
: Governors of All States Issuing Executive Orders abridging
: the 1st Amendment of the Constitution University of
: North Carolina, Chapel Hill Professor Ralph Baric, et
: al. And unknown Parties Dr Martin writes:
: "In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its
: associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed
: using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit
: or implicit agreements including licensing, or other
: consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more
: foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of
: their proprietary technology when the US Supreme Court
: confirmed that such patents were illegal and when the
: National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on such
: research. "The aforementioned items appear to
: constitute, "contract, combination in the form of
: trust or otherwise, or conspiracy," as defined under
: 15 US Code § 1. "Under 15 U.S. Code § 1
: (the Sherman Antitrust Act) 'Every contract, combination in
: the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint
: of trade or commerce among the several States, or with
: foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person
: who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or
: conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed
: guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
: punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a
: corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by
: imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said
: punishments, in the discretion of the court.'"
: His lawsuit additionally points out that on December 31,
: 2019, the Chinese government informed the World Health
: Organization (WHO) that many SARS cases were being treated
: in the Wuhan area and the CDC reported the first US case of
: SARS-CoV like illness in January 2020 with the CDC's
: Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases
: and 210 tests. There are only two ways this is
: possible. Either the CDC: "a) had the mechanism
: and wherewithal to conduct tests to confirm the existence
: of a 'novel coronavirus'; or, b) did not have said
: mechanism and falsely reported the information in January.
: It tests credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could
: manufacture and distribute tests for a 'novel' pathogen
: when their own subsequent record on development and
: deployment of tests has been shown to be without
: reliability. "Notwithstanding, the CDC and WHO
: elected to commit to a narrative of a novel coronavirus –
: exhibiting properties that were anticipated in the U.S.
: Patent 7,618,802 issued to the University of North Carolina
: Chapel Hill's Ralph Baric – and, in the absence of testing
: protocols, elected to insist that SARS-CoV-2 was the
: pathogen responsible for conditions that were consistent
: with moderate to severe acute respiratory syndrome.
: "On March 4, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom
: appears to have violated the law of the State of California
: by issuing Executive Order N-33-20 based on the 'threat of
: COVID-19' with no evidence that such threat existed as
: confirmed by serology or confirmed immunologic
: evidence. The Government Code sections cited in the
: Order (Government Code sections 8567, 8627, and 8665)
: require that criteria be met which do not include the
: 'threat' of any condition but evidence of said condition.
: At that time, neither the CDC nor the WHO had sufficient
: testing in place to: a) confirm and isolate 'a novel
: coronavirus' from other coronaviruses; b) California did
: not have pathology data to suggest that an epidemic was
: imminent; and, c) the rest of the United States was equally
: incapable of making any such assessment as a result of the
: aforementioned conspiring parties actions. Governor
: Newsom’s Executive Order, followed by numerous other
: similar orders, all are based on the threat of a thing that
: may or may not exist. "Around March 12, 2020, in
: an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of
: securing additional funding from both Federal and
: Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID’s Dr Fauci elected to
: suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom
: presentation alone. Not surprisingly, this was necessitated
: by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci’s
: and others’ criteria for depriving citizens of their 1st
: Amendment rights... "After inflicting
: grave harm to the citizens of the United States of America
: in economic hardships resulting from their allegation of an
: 'epidemic' or 'pandemic', the CDC and the NIAID set forth,
: and the President of the United States and various
: Governors in the respective States promulgated, standards
: for lifting conditions in violation of the 1st Amendment to
: the Constitution that serve exclusively to enrich them.
: Both the presence of a vaccine or treatment and, or, the
: development of testing – both that solely benefit the
: possible conspiring parties and their co-conspirators – are
: set as a condition for re-opening the country. This appears
: to be an unambiguous violation of the Sherman Act and, if
: so, should be prosecuted immediately to the full extent of
: the law." *** Many of my subscribers
: have written in to ask me what they can do about this awful
: situation and all I've been able to advise is for people to
: contact their local representatives and to demand an end to
: the illegal shutdown of their local businesses, freedom of
: movement, etc. Well, Dr Martin has some legalese that
: we can wield, while we're doing that! (See below).
: *** Draft a Letter to ACLU, US Attorney for Your
: District, Congressman/Woman/Senator/Attorney General:
: To Whom It May Concern: The Declaration of a State of
: Emergency and the ensuing lockdown – which exempts persons
: deemed “essential” without any basis in scientific fact or
: in Critical Infrastructure definition under the U.S. DHS
: –violates the legal standard set forth in Jew Ho v.
: Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900).
: Due to the facts outlined here:
: http://www.invertedalchemy.com/2020/04/covid-19-anti-trust-argument.html
: 1. The Governor of Virginia [change to your
: state] could not have known that there was a virulent
: outbreak caused by a single pathogen (reportedly SARS
: CoV-2) when declaring the State of Emergency;
: 2. No scientific evidence has been offered justifying
: the declaration – mere reporting of mortality and morbidity
: based on pneumonia symptoms does not an epidemic or
: pandemic make; 3. The Governor failed to
: provide adequate testing to confirm or deny the presence or
: absence of “a novel coronavirus” and, based on recent
: reports from incarcerated persons, it would appear that
: positive tests COULD NOT have been based on community
: transmission as 96% of confined persons have tested
: positive according to Reuters; and, 4. No
: effort has been made by the Governor or regional health
: authorities to overturn the established science published
: in JAMA that facemasks should not be worn by healthy
: individuals
: (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694)
: and that social distancing that involves the confinement of
: healthy individuals has neither been tested nor validated
: with any science whatsoever. I kindly request
: that you take this matter up on behalf of the Citizens of
: Virginia [change to your state] [your signature,
: name, etc] Running Time 32 mins:

: *************************************************************