Results of ICAN VS CDC can be found on ICANS' own website. They voluntarily dismissed it with prejudice. Which means ICAN didn't win because nothing has changed and no one can cite this case for their own applicaable scenario. So all that "EXTRA" stuff mentioned by whoever that source is just simply isn't true. More than one of "his scenarios for citing this case" applies to me and my family. I am with you guys but at the same time I can't in good conscience allow false statements be made as truth. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Warm regards
S

I apologize for the second email but I'm not exactly sure how ICAN didn't win because you can look inside of any vaccine box and find all of the ingredients and the fact that they say that it hasn't been tested for its carcinogenic or mutegenic properties and hasn't been evaluated for its effects on infertility and a slew of other things. Right inside the manufacturer's box that they pull the syringe out of. The instructions openly admit that this s*** hasn't been tested for several things. Well at least with the flu shot anyways. Seen it with my own eyes. Which is why I care, because I know what carcinogenic and mutegenic means and it's not good for us period.
Warm regards
S