--------------------
Nor does 'what they do' matter to any 'candidate' for the big 'unnecessary parasite prize' of the Oval Office.
Hillary could have close personal relations with a donkey in the middle of the street, have the video footage all over Youtube, and if the Kabbal decides Hillary should have the prize, she will 'win'.
Hillary and company don't care about ethics.
She has more important things to worry about.
Ethics only matter to people who worry about ethics.
Got ethics?
"Scuse me; This is politics. We don't need no stinkin' ethics".
The only thing that will prevent Hillary from the big prize, is if she gets the word from upstairs that she will not be selected to sit in the big girl chair.
If the Kabball decides Hillary doesn't get the prize, she will flame out.
But that is a decision the Kabball will make, and, as usual, the ethical 'voters' will have no say in the decision.
Have to agree though, that when the Kabballs other talking heads (CNN) start badmouthing their golden child, it could be a bad signal - sign for Hillary, coming from upstairs.
Lion
--------------
: OMG!! - "listed some of the companies that were forking
: over $200,000 apiece to have private sessions with her
: (’speaking fees’)"!!!
: Lymerick
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: Wall Street Warns Dems Not to Choose Senator Elizabeth Warren
: Eric Zuesse
: RINF Alternative News
: Hillary Clinton’s unannounced campaign for the U.S. Presidency
: has already failed. Her arrogance (or else stupidity) in
: having wiped clean the hard drive of the private server she
: had used for her emails while she was the U.S. Secretary of
: State adds insult to the injury already done to her
: incipient campaign by the earlier revelation that she had
: evaded the State Department’s record-keeping system and had
: used her private server for all of her State Department
: emails and not only for her personal emails. (The NYT had
: headlined March 2nd: “Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email
: at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules.”)
: CNN, early Saturday morning, March 28th, bannered the big
: follow-up, “Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal
: server,” and reported that, “Hillary Clinton permanently
: deleted all the emails on the private server she used to do
: official business as secretary of state.” Ms. Clinton
: immediately responded to reporters’ questions by saying
: that nothing of importance to, or concerning, her State
: Department business, was on that server, and that she had
: recently sent to the investigator who is looking into this
: matter “roughly 30,000 emails” that related to State
: Department business. However, the public, and prosecutors,
: will now not be able to see the other emails (which she
: says were approximately 32,000), because she then had that
: server wiped clean. She says she had had this done because
: “no one wants their personal emails made public.”
: In other words: the public would just have to trust her
: assertion that nothing related to government business was
: in those “personal emails.”
: Private letters from Thomas Jefferson, George Washington,
: Abraham Lincoln, and other American leaders, are published
: in books; but Hillary Clinton does not think that the
: American public should ever have access to hers. Today’s
: emails are like paper-and-ink letters in that bygone era;
: but she has, in effect, burned them. Historians won’t get
: to see them; neither will the public.
: Even the earlier revelation had caused her ratio of
: unfavorable-to-favorable ratings in polls to soar.
: On March 19th, Reuters headlined, “Many Democrats want
: independent Clinton email probe: Reuters/Ipsos poll,” and
: reported: “Support for Clinton’s candidacy has dropped
: about 15 percentage points since mid-February among
: Democrats, with as few as 45 percent saying they would
: support her in the last week.”
: In the CBS News poll, taken March 21-24, Hillary’s Favorable
: rating was 26%, Not Favorable was 37%; this had last been
: polled by CBS on September 12-16 of 2008: 51% Favorable,
: 35% Unfavorable. Her Favorable is down from 51% to 26%,
: almost half, since then. The latest Gallup poll on that
: question was March 2-4 (this year): 50% Favorable, 39%
: Unfavorable. Assuming comparability of the Gallup and the
: CBS polls, her figures went from 50% Favorable and 39%
: Unfavorable just as the first news of this email scandal
: broke, down to 26% Favorable and 37% Unfavorable just
: before the latest revelation — the revelation that she had
: wiped her server clean — and it’s likely to go even lower
: now, after that second blow.
: SNIP