The weak whine about being offended, when they cannot make a competent counter argument.
That is not the behavior of a real patriot.
That sounds like the behavior of a female or zionist jew. Was that offensive too?
They also complain about spelling and grammar, yet fail to observe grammatical distinctions such as the difference between the words freedom and liberty. I now expect extra criticism about my own spelling and grammar errors, or occasional word play.
Everyone makes mistakes. Yet, was the idea conveyed successfully? Yes it was. And that is all that communication is for.
Spelling, punctuation don't really say anything about a person. That is just an excuse for not having a counter argument to the point being made.
The serious person will disregard things like this, unless the grammatical errors present two possible ideas that conflict. If someone has difficulty communicating clearly, an interested listener would simply ask more detailed questions, to narrow the possible interpretations.
Credibility is not related to articulation skill level. This statement is meant to degrade the value of the information being presented.
Whenever someone claims there was no basis for making a point, its usually meant to devalue the effort, and prevent any further raising of the point. Keeping the idea obscure, and unclear in the mind of those that are learning from the discussion.
"Duh! The dictionary isn't presenting this nonsense...SOW is and for what purpose might I ask??"
Because there is a difference, which has been pointed out numerous times already. And that's ok. It will be pointed out many more times, if necessary.
FREEDOM, Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others. 2 Har. Cond. L. R. 208.
LIBERTY. Freedom from restraint. The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.
Freedom = the right to do what is not forbidden by law
Liberty = without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature
Notice this is opposite from SOW's point of view, but nonetheless it shows the same distinction.
Why is this important?
Because our entire society has been manipulated into slavery by confusing the average flesh and blood human being. Repeatedly, for many generations. It is an important lesson to learn.
And, yes, spelling and grammar all come into play.
Whenever someone tries to justify having some form of government, it is usually out of fear that terrible things will result without government. This comes from being immersed within such a construct for their entire lifetime. It also indicates a lack of observation of nature, including everyday human behavior. It is shortsightedness.
Does government authority ever prevent bad shit from happening? If you listen to the mainstream news, they will lie and say it does. But, if you pay attention, you'll notice they always show up after the event. It is female nature to cling to a hive mind. To find safety in numbers. To seek a big strong looking protector. This is a trap. Whiners do the same thing. They want the entire population to pay for things that conform to their personal preferences. Just like females. Collectivism.
Have you ever walked through a mall during the holiday season? It is chaotic, yet people inherently manage to avoid catastrophe. Have you ever come up to an intersection with malfunctioning stop lights, and noticed people manage to cooperate with each other, patiently? This isn't a new discussion. Certain locales have tested this, by removing the stop lights and stop signs, and actually had a reduction in accidents.
Each is responsible for their own self-defense, safety, navigation, survival, and comfort. Both emotional and physical comfort. The entire society is not responsible for each other. But, if you pay attention, you'll notice people are naturally charitable.
Jordan Peterson - Agreeable and Disagreeable People
What this is about is that SOW does not fit the spirit of RMN."
Now that was a pathetic response. It reminds me of a backstabbing female, trying to persuade coworkers to get rid of someone she doesn't like. Or a zionist jew trying to get someone kicked off of a platform. Pathetic.
The spirit of rmn? The spirit of rmn, is one of exposing bullshit.