Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
It is evident from 99% of the conversations moving around “ Constitutions” that the essential elements are never addressed.
The dialogues revolve around results created by constitution, while never addressing the cause of the constitution and why it is ignored by public servants.
One basic question opens the dialogues from the beginning.
Please request Miss Hall answer the question below.
What is your legal relationship with the Constitution, either state or federal, and what public record verifies that relationship?
With no legal relationship in evidence, all the dialogues about constitutions are invalid because there are no real parties of interest present.
Servants to or beneficiaries of trust contracts may be principals with proper documentation.
~~~
I have no communication with Hall, nor do I speak for her.
One does not need to be a party to anything, in order to have a conversation. Ever walked by a homeless person? And if you walk up on me, while I'm talking to myself, please don't interrupt, as that would be rude.
The cause for the constitution appears to further consolidate the populations under one yoke. We are told that it was also to protect freedom, liberty, property.
It is ultimately ignored by public servants due to the desire for personal gain, by the public servants. Throw in some blackmail, etc.. It is also "ignored" through manipulating the public perception, by semantic head games, to obfuscate with the color of law.
It appears that there is no documentation, serving as public record, defining the relationship, of a particular flesh and blood human being with a particular "constitution", nor its relationship to a fictional entity, established by a "constitution". Even the signers of the constitution of the usa were just reps.
Grown men and women, are no different than children, playing a made up game. Its just that the losers actually suffer, when adults take this bullshit seriously.
The states are a party to the federal constitution. The people are said to be a party to the states. Although there is no legit documentation of every flesh and blood human being consenting to the establishment of each state, nor to the federal government.
The government uses all manner of constructive fraud to create a false, subjective relationship, through contracts. Since most of the population is ignorant of these things, we go deeper into delusion. This has detrimental affects on everyone, including the manipulators.
However, by default, by the observable fact, that a flesh and blood human being, a living creature, is alive, wereas the document called a "constitution", is not alive, establishes a basic relationship. The document/constitution is a subcreation, while the flesh and blood human is a creator. This alone establishes superiority, above the law. The flesh and blood is further upstream of cause and effect.
This does not establish that a particular flesh and blood human being is related, as in, creator, or signer, of a particular document.
Legal relationship, or lawful relationship? A legal relationship can just look like one, a lawful relationship is one. But its still just fictional shit. And so is a signature on a document, supposedly having some significance, or importance.
The ideas that we are discussing here are often portrayed as being a way for flesh and blood human beings to get along with each other harmoniously. However, people can get along just as good as not having a referee/ruling-authority. Police are never there when shit goes down anyway. And when they do show up, they and the legal system just make things worse, as well as take a piece of the action. No government, is the best government.
The government and its goon squad will tell you that because you dropped out of your mama within these lines, that you fall under their jurisdiction. Now, I could say, that because I'm standing within these lines, and I'm flesh and blood, that I am a party to this here relationship. And since I'm the flesh and blood, the fiction shall do my bidding. If its good for the goose..
After all, what was the stated intent behind the establishment of the document's creation? To protect my freedom, liberty, property. If that is the intent, which was used to graft this construct upon my shoulders, then that is the intent upon which I shall beat the crap out of it. Just fictional right?
One could make the claim, that because the state and fed governments are open to the public and claim to act on our behalf, that they are for the populations benefit. Innuendo is a double edge sword.
All throughout history, we have people trying to manipulate the masses. This imagined divine right, etc.. Governments of, by, and for the people, are no different. Like a moth to flame the speakers of legalese will be attracted, to use their craft to weasel their way into leading the masses by their own confusion.
The legal relationship with any constitution/government, is made by the fact that people have to deal with the goon squad, that is sent out to collect taxes, money, assets, for failure to comply with the demands made by the fictional entity, claiming rights over property owned by the individual flesh and blood members of the population.
The attack, or threat of attack, is what gives birth to the relationship. The attack is put on record, by the attacker itself.
Speaking to the Florida Senate Judiciary Committee