Regarding copyright, see Legal Notice on the linked page:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/01/the-probate-and-pledges-trading-upon.html

=====

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

The Probate and the Pledges - Trading Upon What Isn't Theirs

By Anna Von Reitz

First, I want to cut to the chase with all these silly people like Phil Hudok and Richard S. claiming that they are getting money and "awards" from the Federal Government.

The Federal Government has no money.

All the Federal Government has is "credit" based on the assets of the people of this country. Your assets.

So when the Federal Government offers to pay you, an American, with credit that is based on the value of your own assets, all it does is create more debt that is being held against you and your assets.

It's not a "payment" to you at all. It's more debt.

The idea that Congress is paying you back for anything using credit based on your same assets, is too profoundly idiotic to deserve comment, yet that is what these Cretins in Congress are proposing as remedy.

It's clear that either: (a) they don't have a clue or (b) they think that we don't have a clue.

The Pope and the Queen owe us more money and credit than Midas ever dreamed of, but having the Federal Government paying off in "Notes" provides no access to their coffers, because Federal Reserve Notes are based on the value of our labor and United States Notes are based on our gold.

They have to pay us with their gold, not our gold, in order for it to be a payment or a remedy.

So their tongue-in-cheek offer thus far is to have us pay ourselves by further indebting ourselves and our own assets, including our children and their children and their children and......

It's an outrageous con, I'll give you that, but no banana. Bad monkeys overall.

Second, let's blow the horn about "Property Taxes"....

Let's say you are the Gubmint (not the actual government, a foreign corporation in the business of providing governmental services for hire), and you sneak around and make a false claim in commerce against my 40 acre cow pasture and don't tell me a word about it.

You take your crooked claim, your False Title, to a Crooked Bank, and the Crooked Banker looks over his shoulder and says, "Well, nobody's here saying that this isn't valid, so I'll give you a loan against the value of this 40 acres...."

So now you, the Gubmint, have secretively helped yourself to the value of my land and the Banker has you on the hook for it.

You begin making payments with interest to the Crooked Bank on this fraudulent loan, but because you, the Gubmint, don't actually produce much of anything, you can never keep up with the payments and interest.

Eventually, you run out of the credit you leveraged against my land, and as a corporation, you decide to go bankrupt --- whereupon Mr. Crooked Banker hires a Bill Collector, who comes to me and says, "You owe $1,258,089.00 in back taxes on this 40 acre parcel. Time to pay up!"

And I say, "What? You've got crackers for brains. I never saw you before in my life, have no contract with you, and this forty acres isn't worth anything near $1,258,089.00."

To which he says, "I have title to this land, just lookee right here.... from the "State of Walamazoo".

Now, I live in a State called "Walamazoo" and once upon a time, that State had a business called "The State of Walamazoo" --- so it seems that Mr. Bill Collector is talking about my State and its State of State, because my ears (and maybe my eyes, too) don't catch the difference between "The State of Walamazoo" and "the" State of Walamazoo. But....

This Shandy Dandy Bill Collector is not actually talking about my State or its business called "The State of Walamazoo". He's talking about a different "State of Walamazoo", an incorporated franchise of the same foreign commercial corporation that took the loan against my land, and now, he's trying to profit himself and the Crooked Banker and the crooked governmental services corporation via a similar names deceit.

He's not talking about any actual "Property Taxes", either, but if I am a typical American Farmer, I've been trained to think that I owe taxes, lots of them, and that "the government" has the right to lay all these taxes on me.

Unfortunately, I haven't been taught to tell the difference between my own government and a foreign commercial corporation in the governmental services Biz ---- a foreign corporation that is operating under conditions of constructive fraud and color of law, a corporation that doesn't have any valid and fully disclosed contract with me or any justifiable right to make claims against my land, issue any titles related to it, or take out loans against it.

You see how this works? A Third Party, a foreign corporation in the business of providing governmental services, comes in, makes a bogus non-consensual claim against your assets, secures credit for itself based on your assets, then when it goes bankrupt, you are left on the hook as the "Co-Signer" who is purportedly "pledged" to pay this debt.

They try to hide this circumstance by calling it "Property Taxes", and they tell some other lies about the status and use of your private property by classifying it as "income-producing commercial, residential, or agricultural property"---- but what I have just described for you, is how they are actually working this constructive fraud scheme.

Another outrageous con job, no banana. Bad monkeys overall.

So now we get down to the "pledges" --- who or what "pledged" you, or Mr. Farmer, either?

Franklin Delano Roosevelt "pledged" the Federal Civil Service (Municipal Government) Employees and their Dependents to some "holy cause" during his First Inaugural Address. That wasn't explained to us or to them, but that's what the words say.

And on March 6, 1933, the [Territorial United States] Congress of Governors "pledged their [Territorial] states and the citizenry thereof" --- meaning the U.S. Military and their Dependents and the U.S. Territories and Possessions---- which wasn't explained to us or to them, but that's what the words say.

So there you have the two "pledges" one made "in behalf of" Territorial United States Citizens, one made "in behalf of" Municipal United States Citizens, both on a non-consensual, undisclosed, and unilateral basis by FDR and the Conference of [Territorial] Governors.

Were any of your ancestors in the Federal Civil Service or the U.S. Military in 1933?

Are you a Federal Civil Service Employee or Dependent, getting the benefit of a Federal Paycheck every month?

Are you a member of the U.S. Military or Dependent, getting the benefit of a Federal Paycheck every month?

So how does anyone get off claiming that you were "pledged" then or now, to pay any debts of any foreign governmental services corporation?

Turns out that there's been a lot of alleged "pledging" going on behind your back.

It seems that your Mother "pledged" and donated you, your Good Name, and your worldly assets to the same foreign Territorial "State of Walamazoo" corporation that took loans out against land that belongs to you, but--- curious thing--- she wasn't given any disclosure that she was doing any such thing. And you were only a few days old when it happened, so you certainly were not competent to act for yourself.

And then, there is "The Pledge of Allegiance" foisted off on schoolchildren, none of whom are ever informed what a "pledge" is ----nor "allegiance" either.

More False Claims in Commerce. More BS. More fraud.
Another Big Con Job, no banana. Bad monkeys all round.

Now, the banks had and still have cause to know that nobody was given disclosure about any of this treasonous bullcrap purportedly being done "for" us behind our backs by treasonous politicians invested up to their eyeballs in these same foreign corporations, all of which happen to be owned directly or indirectly by the Pope.

They have cause to know or suspect that there are not hundreds of millions of unwed Mothers in America, all lined up to give their babies away as Wards of any foreign "State of State".

They have cause to know that there are not hundreds of millions of Federal Employees of either stripe --- Territorial or Municipal --- lined up to donate away everything including the skin on their teeth to any "cause" holy or otherwise, and whose assets have been illegally and immorally "pledged" by foreign corporation officers acting without disclosure or authority to indulge in what Mr. Trump's recent Executive Order called "National Enslavement".

The Crooked Banks loaned money in collusion with a Great Big Fat World Class Fraud Scheme, and at the end of the day, that is their problem. Not mine.

Now, because of all the foregoing outrageous international Bunko -- just imagine Slim Pickens leaned up against a fence saying, "I'll sell you that horse over there for fifty dollars." --- the Pope is shuffling his deck as fast as he can go. The entire world is now in probate.

Oh, glory, me. The only problem with that, is that virtually nobody is left alive to claim back any of it. There's me and my little group of Americans still standing, but the Queen is dead on paper, and the British Isles and the entire Commonwealth stands unclaimed. Yes, strange, but true, they've falsified records for so many years and gotten away with it, that all the living people and even the Sovereigns have suffered genocide on paper.

Because these billions of people and their Heads of State and their Monarchs have been "done in" on paper without their knowledge or consent, the Holy See is one of only a handful of actual unincorporated governments left, and while it is responsible for all this fraud, it still intends to try to claim everyone else's property as "abandoned assets".

Very, Very Bad Monkeys, indeed.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

*************************************************************