(Thanks, T. :)

Reader T. writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Fulford, complete: 'Detailed plan for worl....

Regarding Benjamin Fulford's crusade for a world planning agency:

I have written to him and challenged him to explain how any such international agency would not become corrupt and a threat to Liberty as have the UN and the EU and I might add NATO. He has not responded to this, although he responded to other questions I have had in the past.

Fulford's principal arguing point for this is the success of a Japanese version at the national level. But we have only to read about the EU to understand creating a bureaucracy with any power at the international level ends up with a parasitic governmental monster leeching taxes without control by voters.

Fulford has been good at recognizing and reporting problems but this idea of an international-level is BY TEST more dangerous than the Fukushima polution in the Pacific and would IMO make many of the problems of corruption, trafficking, etc. worse.

I see more of a future in starting with America recognizing Socialism as anti-Constitutional and therefore treasonous, and as espousal of theft, and instituting specific penalties against its espousal, to include loss of voting privileges.

To those who think this radical I ask them to read about Socialism, Capitalism, and the Philosophy Of Liberty at FEE.org and Schoolland.net and to read the previous post here at Link http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/read/6592 .

Also I ask this: why would you think we could get rid of all this corruption and destructive behavior by just using the same supposed controls that failed to stop it in the first place? This problem must be rooted out or it grows back with new faces. We already know free speech has limits, and we also know Socialism has killed MANY more people than yelling "fire" in a theatre.

***************************************************************************