“Spiritually” speaking YES, what is stated in your posts are ALL “true”.
DOCTRINALLY, they are “File 13”.

“Physically, Spiritually and Prophetically” as it is stated in your first post above. According to you, THAT is how the Scriptures supposed to be taken. Of course, there are no Scriptures to support your claim and this is why you mix up your “Physically, Spiritually and Prophetically” interpretations of the Scriptures with DOCTRINE and you call them DOCTRINES. Doesn't work that way.

Well, I ask you again; WHERE IS THE DOCTRINE that supports your claims????
After all, the word of God is profitable for DOCTRINE, DOCTRINE, DOCTRINE, NOT “Physically, Spiritually and Prophetically” as you state. WHAT YOU STATE IS “PRIVATE INTERPRETATION OF THE SCRIPTURES, A NO, NO IN THE SCRIPTURES!

Entering through the “Eastern gate” is STILL FUTURE and comes hand in hand with the split of the mount of Olives in two. The blocking of the “Eastern gate” with bricks and mortar was done to PREVENT Jesus to walk through it at the SECOND coming.

Did the mount of Olives also split in two when Jesus was there???
You also quoted that verse to support your stand that Jesus already entered the “Eastern gate” therefore fulfilled prophecy.
Why did you quote it when IT DIDN'T HAPPEN YET????

“Satan” must be “omnipresent” if he can “sit” in the minds of millions of people.

Is “Satan” omnipresent?

The temple itself doesn't have to be built from stones. A tent (Tabernacle, complete with the “Holy place and the Holy of Holies) WOULD be sufficient but it will be a stone temple, where the “Antichrist/Satan” will LITERALLY SIT ON THE FABRICATED “MERCY SEAT” WITH TWO HANDS ON EACH CHERUB, WEARING AN EYE PATCH AND HAVING A “DRIED UP” RIGHT ARM.

Tell to the Jews over there, there isn't going to be a temple built. lol

Like it is stated, your posts have WONDERFUL SPIRITUAL applications of Biblical events and about various conditions of people but DOCTRINALLY, it..shall we say “stinks”. There is NOTHING WRONG applying Scriptures in a spiritual way, to demonstrate something, but it WON'T BE THE TRUTH.

Also keep in mind that I try to PASS ON THE VIEWS OF OTHERS AND TRY TO BE EQUALLY FAIR TO ALL POINTS OF VIEWS IN OTHER POSTS TOO. The posts that are written are not necessarily my views but again, “PASSING ON” views of others, as faithfully as if they would be telling them. This confuses certain individuals and they BELIEVE I protect or I am against somebody or something. NOT SO! Simply PASSING ON KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION.

Just because I read the “Communist Manifesto”, it doesn't mean I am a “Communist”. Just because I read “Mein Kamps”, it doesn't mean I am a “Nazi”. Just because I read and study the Bible, it doesn't mean I can be labelled to be a “Christian” or whatever else.

I play the “Devil's advocate” MANY times, for the simple reason to make people THINK. NOBODY knows what I really “believe” or really know, to avoid any “followers”.

I know one thing for certain from experience. Those who are eager to quote tons of Scriptures to show how much they “know” are just the opposite.

YES. SHOW me the DOCTRINE about your claims because so far what you quoted are NOTHING ELSE but “Physically, Spiritually and Prophetically” applicable Scriptures as you yourself put it and could be quoted to almost anything. You are UNABLE to present DOCTRINAL explanations to your claims. You mix up and interchange “Physically, Spiritually and Prophetically” interpreted Scriptures and you call it DOCTRINE. They are not.

This question will show how much knowledge you have in DOCTRINE. Simple “Yes/No” answer. You don't have to reply if you do not wish, just answer to yourself.
Are the “Kingdom of God” and the “Kingdom of Heaven” the same???
:)