Posting for Basil who lives in the furthest reaches of the US.

**********************************************

*******************************************

Re: New York Fire Commissioners Call for New 9....

The comment about the hologram planes is not without merit as the military has this type of holographic projection capabilities. The voice of god weapon used in the first invasion of Iraq is one of these type of weapons. But proving that theroy, just as Dr Judy Woods theroy on directed energy weapons being used is difficult without the weapon used being presented for evidence. The impact areas on the trade towers add to this hologram speculation as the outter columns are severed almost in a straight line on the bottom edge of these impact area columns. I would suggest reading the 911 blogger site for an excellent article on the column assembly to get a greater insight as to why these colums would not sever in that pattern. In regards to the nuclear comment; it is true that large high rise buildings have to include a demolition plan in the initial design as all building have a life span and will need to be taken down at some point. Dimitri Khalezov was one of the first people to speak about the nuclear component of 911, and there are leaked FEMA photos that show areas under the trade towers that have melted granite. Nither nano thermite nor any other conventional explosive has that ability. Veterans Today did a series of scientific articles that discuss the nuclear component in detail. But with this said it is very unlikely that a nuke would be buried under a building for a hundred years or more as nuclear based weapons have a shelf life, and require regular observation to insure the functionality, and stability of said weapon. Architect's and Engineers have done a good job in presenting the nano thermite position, but that explosive alone would not contain enough force to destroy the buildings as they were. The trade towers had very large refrigerant tanks that were for each building's air systems. The nuclear weapon going off under these tanks would have the same type of effect as the hydrogen bomb which could have signs like those of a directed energy weapon as the towers themselves would have acted as chimney funneling these reactions upward. I believe all these positions have merit, and were most likely executed in conjunction with each other. But proof is required to get public opinion/support for a position which is why the nano thermite is the most logical path to pursue. The most important thought to maintain is that of the official narrative not only being improbable, but impossible.

********************************