A Striking revelation about Epstein's island: There is nothing there that anyone would want to go there for..
source: http://82.221.129.208/.wf8.html

There are no beaches. There are no lawn chairs with umbrellas. There is a pool mixed in with the buildings on one end of the island, but that's not a reason to go to an island. The entire shoreline is craggy rocks that are hard to approach and offer nothing in the realm of tropical fun. There is no reason to be there, so why did so many of the elites go?

Epstein's island could at least be approached on a zodiac (that's the only viable option) - a zodiac, with a motor that did not extend deep into the water. You could probably get away with mooring a zodiac on the rocky shore below the temple, and then have a really good look a drone can't give you.

The drone operator for the drone videos was obviously being very careful to not lose an expensive drone. The drone was more than just a DJI Mavic, it had a zoom capable camera, and I am sure the operator did not want a loss of at least a few thousand dollars so the operator was very cautious to not have it crash there. But it would have been nice if the operator of the drone had approached the temple windows more closely. I understand why not though.

If anyone does go to that island, it is obvious that temple is undergoing major changes which at present hide what it was. If it does go down to an underground area, anyone who explores the island is probably going to have to figure out what got covered over by tapping the floor and listening for the hollow spot. It may have been, in preparation for a raid of the island, concreted over completely but it will still be there, accessible with a sledge hammer. I find the fact that it is being renovated right now to be puzzling.

It may not be to cover up what it is however, because outside the "temple" there is a square area that looks like it was being upgraded. Maybe Epstein really was just doing maintenance and "improvements" and the owls and dome were going to go back on it again. Who knows. but the point is, the outside area is awful elaborate for that small of a building to be there, which means it is likely an entrance to something bigger. A closer look with a drone might reveal a staircase going down but if it does not, it would not mean there is nothing there. You'd have to actually go inside and start banging on things to confirm it.

The U.S. government knows what is there, the original launch of Space Shuttle Columbia had ground penetrating radar that could have revealed if something is there, and I can only guess that almost 40 years of tech improvements helped that. This was a major story with the space shuttle back in the very early 80's, it ended up in National Geographic, where some of the scans were printed. They were supposedly for showing what was under the surface in Egypt and other places. The penetration depth was up to 50 feet. I was unable to find anything about shuttle radar missions on Google, but Yandex at least had This, and This report also found via Yandex also mentions the space shuttles were major platforms for ground penetrating radar. IMPORTANT: Google yielded NOTHING on this topic, I had to use Yandex.

At any rate, the point is that the tech it would take to know what was on Epstein's island has existed for decades. The very first space shuttle launch had it.

Oh, and this also means they know about your underground bunker, with the only thing keeping it safe being whether or not the wrong people care about it.

: By Quantian

: 7 days ago, 16 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
: So, apologies in advance, but I want to do a quick little
: THREAD to explain my theory of what the Epstein story
: really is. I promise this isn't some crazy Pizzagate
: conspiracy about space lizards, just a neat little
: explanation that IMO perfectly fits the known facts (0/13):
: (1/13) Let's take as our starting points two givens.
: (A.) You are a committed, unrepentant pedophile
: (B.) Because of your old job in private banking, you are very
: connected to lots of very, very wealthy people
: We'll also assume a goal: (Z.) You want to become very rich

: (2/13) The obvious route is, well, obvious: you could just be
: a pimp, offering underage prostitute services to very rich
: people. This has two problems: you're very disposable (see:
: DC madam), and it's also not super lucrative. You can't
: charge millions of dollars up front.

: (3/13) The second level though follows instantly: You don't
: need to charge up front, just get them to have underage
: sex, and then blackmail them afterwards for hush money.
: Better ROI, but you're still a liability, and producing and
: receiving big bribe money raises big questions.

: (4/13) So, what to do? Well, the second idea has some merits.
: First, you need to recruit people in. Have lots of massive
: parties at your spacious home (check), invite top
: academics, artists, politicians to encourage people to come
: (check), and supply lots of young women (check)

: (5/13) You don't even have to do anything, and most people
: invited might even be totally unaware of the real purpose
: of the parties! But, sooner or later, some billionaire will
: get handsy, she'll escort him to a room with a hidden
: camera, things happen. Morning after, you strike.

: (6/13) You inform him she was really 15, but you offer him a
: nice, neat way to buy your silence: a large allocation to
: your hedge fund, which charges 2/20 (check). To ensure
: nobody else asks questions, you also take the extraordinary
: step of demanding power of attorney (check)

: (7/13) The fund is offshore in a tax haven (check) and nobody
: will see the client list (check). Of course, you don't
: really know anything about investing, instead making up
: some nonsense about currency trading (check), and nobody on
: Wall Street has ever traded with you (check)

: (8/13) The fund itself doesn't need investment personnel
: (check), only some back office people to process the wires
: (check). You don't want to money from non-pedophiles, or
: they'll notice you've just put it in a S&P 500 fund, so you
: reject all incoming inquiries (check)

: (9/13) A $20 million wire from Billionaire X to you with no
: obvious reason will raise many questions, and the IRS will
: certainly want to know what you did to warrant it. A $5
: million quarterly fee for managing $1 billion in assets?
: Nobody bats an eye.

: (10/13) Because of this structure, you're extraordinarily
: secretive about client lists (check) because they aren't
: clients, they're pedophiles paying you bribes, and they
: also are very secretive, which is why no letters or return
: streams ever leak (check)

: (11/13) Occasionally you may also try this trick on other
: people: important political figures, mayors, prosecutors,
: etc. They don't invest in the fund, but it's nice to have
: them in your pocket. Others (academics, artists, etc.) can
: just be bought with money as a PR smokescreen.

: (12/13) And, of course, the scam can be kept going as long as
: people are willing to pay, which is forever. If you're ever
: caught, just lean on some of your other friends in
: government to lean on the prosecutor to get you a
: sweetheart deal. There's almost zero risk.

: (13/13) And the last piece of the puzzle is the evidence.
: You'd want it somewhere remote, but accessible: a place the
: US can't touch but you have an excuse to visit all the time
: to update. Remember that offshore fund?

: I bet there's a *very* interesting safe deposit box there.
: Two small points of clarification: 1. This scheme works just
: as well if the billionaires are in on it from the getgo as
: a way to buy sex; I assumed that was obvious but I guess
: not.

: 2. There’s no need to invoke the Mafia/Russia/Mossad/CIA/etc,
: that’s just needlessly overfitting.