(Thanks, jt. :)

Reader jt writes:

=====

America is returning to the pre 1933 equity and the protection of inalienable rights rather than civil rights or the illusionary social contract. But what exactly are our inalienable rights? The constitution says that our inalienable rights are self-evident yet they have been the subject of many debates for decades with no consensus on what they are. Mike Pompeo just established an Inalienable Rights Commission to determine what constitutes our inalienable rights. For me, having a group of people determine what my inalienable rights are raises a huge red flag!

The constitution states that the sovereignty remains with the people. Therefore, if the people are the sovereign then the one right that comes to mind as being self-evident is “All the rights of a sovereign!” Requires no proof or explanation. Right?! Self-evident!

The true sovereign, operating under the divine right of kings by the original grant of dominion over all things, also must accept the fiduciary duty to harm no one and their oath of fealty to be a good steward. The Sovereign authority granted by God is not a license to pillage and plunder, nor rape nor murder. Sovereignty, by the grace of God, respects all other sovereigns. He understands that we are all beneficiaries in original jurisdiction, each with an equal yet undivided portion of the whole. Each a divine sovereign by the grace of God, owing fealty to our Creator to be a good steward.

The sovereign’s divine right to self-governance is married to the self-evident social contract to harm no one and the fealty owed their Creator to be a good steward. The sovereign people have consented to no surrender of sovereignty in the delegation of responsibilities and their associated grant of authority. The sovereignty remains with the people, the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction.

Just a thought. jt

***************************************************