: Eustace Mullins’ best know book is “The Secrets of the Federal
: Reserve”. He is reviled in mainstream sources as an
: antisemite and holocaust denier, but those are epithets one
: can get merely for telling it like it is.
Check this out for it is what the Word itself says about the sin of Ham, the seducer of his own mother'
here's a snip:
=======================================
" Now we should see a very special point. Because Noah was pure Adamic, his wife and children were also. They apparently were THE LAST ones of Adamic man that was of pure pedigree. (vv 9-10) If God's mission was to preserve the seedline in a pure sense until the birth of Messiah (Gen 3:15) THEN HOW COULD NOAH'S CHILDREN BEGET OTHER RACES? They obviously could not, else they could not have been pure to start with. God's Word says they were of pure linage. God also said KIND after KIND-- remember? ALL of NOAH's Children as well as their offspring were therefore pure Adamic. Believe God.
Ok. If this is the case, then HOW did the kenites and the sixth day creation get through the flood? Answer--- On the Ark. The same way any person will be saved today. On the ark of God, Jesus.
Look if you will at Gen 6:3 "And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. (KJV)
Notice the phrase 'he also is flesh'. It is most important for what follows. Man is declared to be flesh, which should be no big deal. EXCEPT-- Look at the instructions God gave Noah in Gen 6:19 "And of every living thing of ALL FLESH, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female." Not ONLY here, but in EVERY subsequent passage (7:16,7:23, 8:17), God repeats it: "TWO OF ALL FLESH", the male and his female.
Just like God combines all flesh in Gen 6:7 "And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.", He combines them when He instructs Noah. Why is it so hard to understand the truth? Why must man teach the traditions of the pharisees and the lies of the kenites? Why will people continue to believe them in the face of God's Word as well as common sense? I just don't know.
The flood story just would not be complete unless we refute another lie of man. What have you been taught from the cemeteries about the nature or skin color of Canaan, the son of Ham? What have you been taught about the nature of Ham's sin?
We see the first mention of this fellow Canaan in Gen 9:18. It seems seems out of context, placed here. Noah as we see in 9:25 curses this fellow Canaan because of what his father, Ham, did. Does this seem strange to you? It should the way man presents the story. Why should a son get the blame for what a father did? This is totally against God's Will. See the whole chapter of Eze 18, as well as Deu 24:16 "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin." (KJV)
Well, God did not curse Canaan. Noah his grandfather did. Why would Noah curse this first born after all the death he had just witnessed?
As it turns out, this Canaan was an incestuous son, born of Ham and his mother, Noah's wife. Preposterous, you say? No my friend, truth.
Noah made wine, and got drunk. He was living it up after the year he had just been through, and Noah let down his guard. (Gen 9:20-21) Here we see a strange (to us) thing. Gen 9:22 "And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. (KJV)"
What is the sin, we ask, dumbfounded. What is so sinful about seeing a drunk old man lying naked? Now the cemetery teachers will say things like, Ham 'laughed at him', or 'Ham was a homosexual', or 'Ham had no respect', or something equally absurd. The Hebrew phrase "to uncover your fathers nakedness" has a very special meaning. Let us look at Lev 18:8 "The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness. (KJV)" Well, you say, that is perhaps a suggestion, but I don't know...
Ok, How about Lev 20:11 "And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. (KJV)"
Is that language plain enough?
According to the Word, Canaan was an incestuous offspring. OK, now let me ask you what RACE Canaan was? Was he black, red, yellow, white, brown, or adamic? If you answered 'adamic', go to the head of the class. Of course Canaan was adamic, because BOTH of his parents were, and they were just like Noah, 'perfect in their pedigree' (Gen 6:9-10) from Adam, the eighth day man. "
=========================================
Read it all in entirety at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~bobseller1/id20.html
