I
received an email from Anna today, The
Two Deals – Not Just the New Deal,
requesting a response. As usual Anna gets to post her side of the
issue to the masses while my responses are generally met with
resistance and posting delays resulting in an extremely limited
distribution. There seems to be some fear of a real and honest
dialogue. A fear that is fiercely protected by Anna’s followers. It
seems that so many are willing to take Anna’s rhetoric and name
calling filled preaching as gospel while any factual rebuttal is
labelled as an attack against her personally.
I
make no judgments concerning Anna. Who am I to judge? But, I do take
exception to the twisted logic and outright dismissal of valid
research while readily admitting ignorance to TWEA. Even worse is a
rebuttal based in that ignorance.
Anna’s
comments are in black while my responses are in red.
When
I look at the history and read the documents, especially those
concerning Roosevelt and the "New Deal" and the Conference
of Governors and its actions "pledging" the good faith and
credit of "their states and the citizenry" thereof --- it's
apparent that they were talking about their Territorial States of
States and the States of States "citizenry" --- meaning
those relatively few people who actually were United States Citizens.
Not American State Citizens.
They
gave their all-----all 1 in 1550 of us. (Take
note that Anna uses the inclusive word ‘us’) And
it didn't hurt them much, as most of them were ineligible to act as
American State Citizens in the first place.
You
may well be correct, but, then there was FDR’s Inaugural Address of
1933 wher he addressed the American people convincing the entire
American population to also ‘Pledge’ their property and labor to
a sacred purpose …… a Public Trust. FDR had to have the STATES
(The administrators) behind him before he could get the people to
follow.
If
it was simply about "pledging"
the good faith and credit of "their states and the citizenry"
then
FDR’s inaugural Address was addressed to only 1550 people, yet it
was broadcast to the entirety of the American people ‘asking’ the
people to also pledge their good faith and credit which FDR accepted
as a gift at the end of his address. The Territorial
States of States and the States of States had
no authority to Pledge our good faith & credit. The United States
needed all of our property as collateral for the receivership which
required the consent
of the people.
It
was the entire American population who suffered through the great
depression NOT just the 1550 territorial employees. It was the
entirety of the American population who was ‘offered’
a
way out of the depression and that way out was to ‘Pledge’ our
good faith & credit to the common/public good as well. You will
notice FDR’s offer
and
then acceptance
of
the GIFT/Pledge
of
the people’s good faith & credit to be collateralize for the
Public good.
What
they did was provide an excuse for a "legal presumption"
that all the rest of the people in every State were similarly
"pledged" and by a process of constructive fraud,
undisclosed contracts, and semantic deceits, those responsible
unlawfully converted the estates of millions of Americans into their
"Public Charitable Trust" scheme "as if" they
were actual United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States
when they were never either one and never "volunteered" and
never "donated" their children or their earnings, either.
It
was a giant constructive fraud and identity theft and impersonation
scheme, pure and simple.
It
is so easy to point fingers and paint the entire American population
since 1933 as VICTIMS as if the people played no part in the creation
of our present reality. I for one, am NOT a victim screaming “Oh
Whoa is me THEY did this to me!” When one puts away the VICTIM
EXCUSE and bores down into the reality we find that we have been
complicit and must take responsibility for our part of the reality we
have co-created for ourselves. In so doing we see that there is a
remedy …. A method for us to correct the actions of our mother’s
and ourselves. We can either wine and cry about being victims or we
can accept out part in our reality and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
“….
if we do as Jim suggests without first reclaiming our Lawful Persons
as American State Citizens, we have no other recourse: we have
"voluntarily" identified ourselves as British Territorial
Subjects owed restitution under the quid pro quos of the New Deal.
This then means that we cannot receive remedy as Americans.
Lawful
Persons as American State Citizens is
a position/status WITHIN THE WORLD OF COMMERCE. By claiming that
lowly status one is disavowing
their true status as a beneficiary
in original jurisdiction
the highest position on the globe. The world operates under a feudal
system consisting of layer upon layer of trusts within trusts. One
can choose to STAND in any position of any one of the millions of
trusts that exist in the world today. OR, one can claim their true
status as beneficiary in original jurisdiction, a superior position
that encompasses every trust within those layers upon layers of
trusts.
One
cannot serve two masters! You are either a citizen of God’s kingdom
and beneficiary in original jurisdiction or you are a lowly Lawful
Person and American State Citizen thereby
forsaking your rightful status under your Creator. This is a world of
free will and choice!
The
Public Charitable Trust was set up in the wake of The American Civil
War as a welfare fund for displaced plantation workers and their
families to help former slaves survive the bumpy transition to
freedom. That is still the basic premise of the Public Charitable
Trust, in that it is supposed to go to poor people in hard
circumstances to pay for things like catastrophic medical bills and
emergency shelter and travel money to get them back home when they
have wound up in a place and can't get home. Now they are liquidating
this trust as part of the General Bankruptcy of the Municipal
Corporation of the District of Columbia.
I
now see the confusion.
You may be correct in your assessment of the Public
Charitable Trust,
but incorrect in identifying the proper trust of which I speak and/or
the public trust in which the property of the American people has
become embroiled.
I
just can't see myself as a Brit nor as a Pauper, and I certainly am
not a "Person of Color"
You
went WAY OUT IN LEFT FIELD here with these ASSUMPTIONS. Nowhere, in
the TWEA process for redemption of the property does one identify
themselves as Brits, paupers or Persons of color.
Equally,
neither do I identify myself as a State National or lawful person or
American state citizen. I am NOT a citizen, nor property of ANY
STATE,
Territorial States of States and/or the States of States NOR
any status that identifies me as less than a citizen of God’s
kingdom, beneficiary in original jurisdiction.
Whether
you can accept it or not the reality is that our world is built on
the feudal system established in the Bible. In the beginning God
granted man dominion over all things ….. yet the Bible is clear
that God RETAINED OWNERSHIP granting man ONLY dominion over all
things.
And
the land and soil is there to be claimed …
ABSOLUTELY
CORRECT!
But, one must understand that the property
of the American people is HELD IN TRUST …… the 1933 New Deal
Public Trust ….. administrated by a provisional/occupational
force by the consent of the people!
TWEA
is
the Trust Indenture setting forth the Parties, their rights and
remedies,
duties and liabilities and their relationship one to the other. TWEA
is to be used by the beneficiaries
to gain a remedy while
the coeds and statutes are for use by the Citizen/slaves. The courts
understand your status as soon as you file an action by the choice of
law that you use. If you use the codes and statutes you
are considered a citizen/slave
yet when you use TWEA as your jurisdiction the court understand that
you MAY be a private beneficiary …… and the tests begin to find
out which you are …… beneficiary or citizen/slave.
It's
the reclaiming of the land --- the actual and factual world -- that I
care about and value.
We
are on the same page here! But,
we must understand the world of trusts.
One
cannot TAKE property from a trust! One MUST properly REDEEM the
property from the trust. To TAKE is THEFT to REDEEM is HONORABLE!
The
process for the REDEMPTION
of
our property, our good faith & credit, is set in stone within the
Trust
Indenture, TWEA. We
have an absolute right of redemption of our property AND we have an
absolute pathway to redemption all established within the Trust
Indenture, TWEA.
We
regain possession and control over our property and labor through the
honorable redemption of our property and NOT by force or theft. Why
use force and/or theft when a lawful process exists for the peaceful
and honorable release and return of our property?
The
TWEA process for the redemption of property has the side
effect
of correcting your status within the records of the Custodian of the
Alien Property from the of Enemy
Alien to
that of Beneficial
owner
of the claimed property.
The
ABC corporations can
only charge those listed as Enemy Aliens! They
are required to ensure you are on the Alien Enemy list prior to
filing charges against you. Removal of your name from the Enemy Alien
list is a bi product of the Redemption Process. The civil
administration is CHARGING the property when you go into their courts
NOT the living man/woman. When you go to court you are defending your
private property rights. The ENEMY ALIEN has NO PRIVATE PROPERTY
RIGTHS while the beneficial owners hold all of the rights and power.
From
which position do you choose to handle your private affairs?
OH
and BTW, you
can have your cake and eat it too, as
the United States also owes the American people the net earnings
(interest and dividends) accrued and/or accruing in your name for the
use of your good faith & credit.
Perhaps
Jim would be kind enough to share the affidavit and let me see what
is required?
Over
a year ago, (not two years) I provided Anna a great deal of my
research, complete with side notes, annotations and comments, in an
attempt to open a dialogue on the subject. Although Anna readily
accepted and shared my research there was never any effort forwarded
to open a meaningful dialogue. No questions, comments nor concerns
were expressed ……. CRICKETS was all I heard in exchange for my
open and honest sharing.
Although
this seems a rather back door kinda method for an open and honest
dialogue, but at least a dialogue has begun. Let’s see if it gains
any traction this time. jt
