(Thanks, D. :)

I've been aware of Larry Becraft for many years. He seems to have a very firm grip on his own grasp of the law. I've seen him "in debunk mode" with regard to the thoughts of many others. He tends to find things in the words of others that are, by Becraft's lights and specific evidence, simply incorrect, thus undermining the overall credibility of the other writer(s).

That's always been the problem, though, with patriot/sovereignty issues. Proponents of one theory or another about what "the remedy" might be seldom or never sit down together to discuss their ideas and hopefully come to a place of agreement and thus a unified front.

And, of course, the government/corporation offers no help, will not admit to the rightness or wrongness of any particular theory in a way that might be useful. Consequently one never knows if one's theory is _complete_ and, even if right, covers all necessary bases. The only way to test one's theory is to apply it and thereby run significant risk of landing behind bars, as quite a few have done (including at least one RMN Agent).

I don't think it's particularly helpful to refer to anyone's earnest ideas as "lunacy", as Becraft does in the linked article. I'd much rather see folks take the approach of "Come, let us reason together." Whatever the truth is, we really are all in this together.

Reader Doug writes and sends us:

***************************************************************************

Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'The Plot Thickens'

Gee whiz.

Attorney Larry Becraft has a bit to add to Judge Anna's claims.

FALSE CAUSES, FALSE SOLUTIONS
A Study of the Lunatic Fringe
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/FakeJudgeAnna.html

He also is a participant in a Wednesday night Internet meeting discussing the problems of income taxation. [...]

Respectfully, as always,

Doug.

***************************************************************************