Is there a cover-up? You betcha! How did the cathedral escape most of the fire damage, while ARSON can take a year to confirm?
-NW

Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
http://82.221.129.208/.wn5.html

Notre Dame Cathedral artistically shown as collapsing in I Pet Goat 2, and This movie has a reference to the cathedral not being there anymore.

OUT TAKE: Muslims did not burn that Cathedral if the exact scenario it suffered was in I Pet Goat2, (including the spire collapse) and just like 911, movies referenced it's destruction beforehand.

What do you do when you need to change the news cycle? Burn a historic church!

Dime to a dollar says that's what we are looking at with Notre Dame Cathedral, the French government did it (probably with a little help from you know who) NO IFS OR BUTS.

UPDATE: Macron has supposedly "vowed to rebuild" Notre Dame Cathedral

I CALL BULLSH*T. Let's see THAT happen. The only way it will happen is if the only possible reasons for burning it to begin with were:

1. To distract the news cycle.
2. To cause a religion war and Macron got busted.

Perhaps Macron is backing off because the very FIRST thing to hit the alt media news cycle in a big way was that the Mossad burned the cathedral. If that's where alt media took it right from the get-go, obviously the best thing to do is apologize and REBUILD IT. MACRON HAS BEEN PEGGED AS THE GUY THAT HAD IT BURNED QUITE NICELY, SEE THE FOLLOWING:

Another Notre Dame Cathedral fire update: Perpetrators pegged with 90+ percent probability

TO THOSE OF YOU IN ALT MEDIA SAYING THE MOSSAD DID THIS, HERE'S A NICE LITTLE TIDBIT THAT BASICALLY CINCHES IT: WHILE THE CATHEDRAL WAS STILL BURNING, MACRON STATED THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE WAS NOT ARSON.

Do you know how long arson investigations sometimes last? Sometimes, a year or more. You can't say the cause of a fire was not arson when it is still too hot to go in and look at a single thing. This means, with Macron claiming what he did, that the fire was virtually assured to have been a targeted hit, done with Macron's approval and that it WAS ARSON.

Would the Mossad do it for Macron? YEP.

Go over the reports. A large number of them have arson ruled out as a cause. That's IMPOSSIBLE, the perpetrators of this event are part of the government if arson is already "ruled out". Is there a demolition scheduled?, JUST WATCH: There's little damage to the actual interior, the fire looks bad but it was contained to only the roof and the steeple that collapsed, and whatever the steeple fell on below. Firefighters were gunning water into the bottom so fiercely that even the candles survived. The church is miraculously mostly intact. Let's wait and see if the cathedral is ordered to be demolished, despite being practically undamaged, except for an easily replaced roof.

UPDATE: Notre Dame Cathedral mostly unscathed by the massive fire (even the candles made it) UNBELIEVABLE, SEE THIS

Notre Dame Cathedral rumors:

Thus far it is only rumor, but rumor has it that the Mossad burned it down. I am not kidding, that really is the rumor. Purportedly to frame Muslims. I am not going to get onto this topic much, but will say it makes perfect sense. First of all, Muslims held the keys to many of the churches in Jerusalem for hundreds of years on end when there were not enough Christians to use them, and guarded the churches perfectly, despite them being Christian.

I find it highly plausible that the Mossad burned the cathedral down either to frame Muslims or, if the cathedral is ordered demolished or never gets permits to re-open, to strike out Christian roots. It is, as far as I see it, a good thing the story drifted to "the mossad did it" so quickly. BECAUSE: Silverstein said pull it, and building 7 fell simply because it was grief stricken over the deaths of towers 1 and 2. Five guys danced. Had a cool pain job on the van too. It is a good idea to question the Mossad for Notre Dame, because the basements of the WTC exploded before the planes hit, and when the towers fell, there were demolition sprites at regular intervals during the collapse, plus obviously shape charge cut debris, and well, you know. Not Muslims.

If the Mossad burning down the Notre Dame Cathedral hits alt media mainstream, I'll be doing the snoopy dance because after all, WHO WANTS CHRISTIANITY DESTROYED? Just ask your nearest luciferian, or your nearest feminist leader, or your nearest communist. Gee, they are backed predominantly by the same people who backed the Mossad, Muslims don't hate Christians, - in fact, Muslims know Christ is going to return again for the 1000 year reign, that AINT MOHAMMED, who are those claiming Muslims despise Christians trying to fool?

FACT: Muslims did not burn down the Notre Dame Cathedral. Heck, maybe it was burned down because people can obviously see the root existence of Julian Assange has been wiped out. He looks like sentient vegetable Assange, 90 percent brain damaged. I am perfectly game for: Assange was removed the night of October 16/17 2016, vegetablized and homogenized, and then returned for a final showing when the time was right, for a 4+ bil payoff. That would explain everything, including poop on the walls. And the pictures sure look the part, he's a smiling veggie boy now. No Wikileaks dead man switch either.

TIME TO REMOVE ASSANGE FROM THE NEWS CYCLE BEFORE PEOPLE REALLY LOOK INTO THIS, WHAT CAN WE DO ...

HMMMMM I GOT IT! Let's give France a taste of 911!