(Thanks, J. :)
(It's said that the British King granted Lands Patent to encourage colonists to make the very difficult journey and hardships involved in going to America; if so, there is no political sovereign above the people themselves. And, there's some reason to think John, not impulsive Peter, was to have headed things up when the one known as Jesus was no longer around. If so, the supposed lineage that would give the Pope particular authority may not apply.)
Reader JT writes:
***************************************************************************
Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'For All The Jural Assembl....
"Pledge" is a Feudal Oath
Anna is absolutely correct in that: ‘It is a fact that a "Pledge" is a Feudal Oath given by a Serf or Tenant to a sovereign, promising "allegiance" another word from the feudal relationship vocabulary, subjecting yourself to the sovereign and promising to support and protect the sovereign’; and, that: “pledging is a feudal act of serfs and tenants promising to support their sovereign.”
But that is just the beginning of the feudal law in the world today.
“The feudal fictions and services retained in part by the United States is the feudal principle, that the lands are held of some superior or lord, to whom the obligation of fealty, and to pay a determined rent, are due … The lord paramount of all sacage land was none other than the people of the state, and to them, and them alone, the duty of fealty was to be rendered….” 3 James Kent Commentaries on American Law * 509-10 (George Comstock ed., 11th ed. 1866)
We also see that the laws of abandonment and Law of Eminent Domain are all rooted in the feudal tradition of escheat or the right of the lord/king to seize back property formerly granted to a tenant for the king’s own use. The laws of abandonment in every state use the feudal term ‘escheat’ in their statutes.
So, from where does it come?
William Blackstone states that “The pope became a feudal lord; (over church owned property) and all ordinary patrons were to hold their right of patronage under this universal superior.” We know that in 1213 King John gave his entire kingdom to the pope for the salvation of his soul. Although the pope then Granted the kingdom back to King John under a well-documented feudal grant, ownership remained in the pope. It is said that the sun never sets on the British Empire and includes every territory conquered or merged thereto in perpetuity.
We know in feudal law the ‘king’ has the right to rule over the land and the people therein. The ‘king’ is the sovereign and the author of the law as well as the court. In 1302 Pope Innocent issued papal bull Unam Sanctum declaring the papacy’s power and control over all people. We see his claim that: "We define that the Holy Apostolical Seat and the Roman Pontiff hold principality throughout the world."
We see that the pope claims his power and authority as the Successor to Peter. Having the Keys to the Kingdom signifies having the full authority of and conferred by the king; Our Creator.
The church claims: “The authority given to St. Peter and his successors, by the [empirical] power of the Eternal King, excels all power of earthly Kings as it passes uncontrollable sentence upon them all." Bull of Sixtus V., 1585 and describes the Successor to Peter as: "The Great Priest, the most High Pontiff, the Prince of Bishops is, in primacy Abel, in government Noah, in patriarchate Abraham, in order Melchisedec, in dignity Aaron, in authority Moses, in jurisdiction Samuel, in unction Christ."
"It is altogether of the necessity of salvation that every human creature should be subject to the Roman Pontiff"
I understand that, for some, this is all very difficult to accept! For years I have heard the profound rebuttal “I am not subject to the pope!” absent any evidence whatsoever to support their rebuttal. I have heard, “It is not true because I do not believe it.” Denial of the truth makes it difficult, or impossible, to find a solution. A remedy cannot be created out of a fiction but must be based on truth.
I am not religious but rather a spiritual man who chooses to believe that every religion is grounded in the natural law even though buried in layer after layer of dogma. It is the dogmas that leads us astray and is used to control the believers.
There is a great deal of evidence to support the claim that the world operates under the original feudal relationship established by the Creator in Genesis of the Bible. Whether the story told in the bible is fact or fiction may well be debated for eons to come. It may well be that our global political structure is based on long standing traditions rather than any actual legal construct. Eventually, tradition becomes the accepted legal construct upon which one must operate in order to obtain an acceptable remedy.
So it is that the pope has become the one world government with oversight control over the whole. This is a fact that we must all accept before any hope of a remedy will exist.
One can argue that our Founding Fathers successfully TOOK America from the Crown and the Vatican, but a great deal of evidence exists to counter that theory. We can see that the constitution was never signed but rather was ‘witnessed’ by all of the signors! Not one signed the document actually executing it. It never became a valid, executed document needing to be witnessed. We see that the Treaty of Paris, which included the king and the pope, gave rise to the constitution. Why was the pope involved in that treaty? And, is it coincidence that the constitution protects private contracts and made treaties the highest form of law, thereby protecting the pope’s claim? Is it also a coincidence that the Saint Peter’s Basilica Shrine in Washington, DC is the resident agent for the corporate United States?
***************************************************************************